We can tell this now "with pok, you need to abdorb the people too. Means thats many voters too".
It will become an autonomous union territory.
We can tell this now "with pok, you need to abdorb the people too. Means thats many voters too".
Prior to that Pak will acquire J-35 and more PL-15, PL-21 etc. In such short wars political and strategic objects matter less and trophies matter more as they change public opinions, emotions and morale.OMG, wait, we will get another opportunity in just 3-4 months. Just like drug Addicts, Pak cant live without having its dose of sending tangos to India.
OMG, wait, we will get another opportunity in just 3-4 months. Just like drug Addicts, Pak cant live without having its dose of sending tangos to India.
I thought SAAW is specifically for runways. Isn't 100kg warhead is more than enough if the explosion is happening after penetration?
Prior to that Pak will acquire J-35 and more PL-15, PL-21 etc. In such short wars political and strategic objects matter less and trophies matter more as they change public opinions, emotions and morale.
Pakistan probably ran out of war money in 4 days.
True, India showed their strike capability and Pakistan said fck that I'm out.They need advanced communications and an IADS, not another fighter.
They were out of it even before operations began.
Here comes the first one as expected
But what explains integration MICA on that?Apart from dismissing the tail fin for the moment. There's also an M88 video.
Discussed and rebuted here.
We don't know the range of the PL-15. Isn't the debris in the range of that airbase/rafale too?
When the target is receding, the missile's range drops by multiple times. The crash site is 100 km away. The NEZ of P-15 against a head-on target is no more than 45-50 km. Less than half that against a receding target. And the base is 90 km away from the border, and even greater if PAF CAP is at 50 km from border.
Anyway, it's possible the M88 video is a deep fake.
There's no damage to the ground, no crater, no burns, no drag marks, it's like it's been placed there...
And this is the reason.
You can see the crater on the same type of terrain. The M88 crash site is way too clean.
Apart from that, all other crashes have no wreckages. There's one with a supposed Mirage 2000's M53, but no wreckage. There's another with 2 rings, we can't see the wreckage.
Here's a pic:
![]()
This pic was claimed to be 12 years old, but it's actually new. Google Lens sucks with dates. The ring (bottom right) and the wreckage are too small to be from a fighter jet's engine. The scale is completely off.
You can also see what look like two vertical fins. Those look MKI-sized, but the wreckage is too small to be MKI. So they could be fuselage parts from a UAV that are bent forward. It's much more similar to some kind of secret UAV or a Heron.
View attachment 43066
The size seems appropriate for a UAV.
And this is the supposed Rafale crash site in Bathinda. It's way too small to be the Rafale.
View attachment 43067
It's like a small garbage dump on the ground that doesn't even come up to knee height. The length is good for either a plane or a UAV, but the bulk is not that of a 10T machine. So that's likely another UAV.
@LX1111 @vstol Jockey