How many mountains have ukraine got? or the vegetation part, even that is different to what faced in Himalayas to jungles.
Yes this is one major factor when you are trying to establish a products core spec & pro cons of use.
We use wire guided atgms across flat plains desert landscapes. But that is not the sole criteria when atgms are inducted. Various terrains mean various versions , customsations will be implemented. Hence it is not universal config, it is one of the config that can be used across the board but not the only config that will be inducted. Since in house development has begun, we will see so many terrain specific application both in fpv , drone dropped munition as well as drone based pgm systems.
If you observe the use of FPV drones in Russo Ukraine war, you will realise that the Primary application of FPV drones are taking out enemy Armour and supply vehicles and implementing upto 20 km elastic defence zones at depth. No one is driving Armour or supply vehicles through any deep forests, anywhere there is a motorable road, a wire guided FPV can operate, more effectively than any weapon system to date. And no, it's comical to compare issue of wire guided atgm with very limited Maneuverability in 2 planes with wire guided FPV drones that are highly maneuverable. A wire guided FPV drone can practically fly around a tree or fly along a curvy road for kms hunting for targets. A wireguided atgm is practically high speed rocket with very limited Maneuverability. There is a reason why serious nations are going all in on drones and FPV drones. US military will acquire a million drones in 2 years and half a million to million each every year going forward.
PLA meanwhile planning to Induct 600,000 drones by 2026 & probably millions going forward. They surely have the Industrial capacity do it with ease.
Meanwhile we are here talking in hundreds and thousands range. The latest order for FPVs were just 1,000.
Would have explained a lot but clearly you are way too immature mentally to understate a serious threat like that, so maybe when you are capable of understanding I will explain.
It's not immaturity, it's not being a fanboy.
our response to such petulant event that you cite (like something revolutionary in warfare, which it is not that much, its more of a cowardice tactic) would be so severe for the enemy that they will think twice, thrice multiple times before even employing such tactics again. Response is the key element why Pak had to stop within 4 days and Rus-Ukr ongoing for more than 4 years. Everybody is a boss, until the real boss walks in is apt in war
Brother, come down to the earth and stop being a fanboy. You are too delusional to understand why Russo Ukraine war hasn't ended in 3 years while Indo Pak hostility ended in 4 days. It's not because mighty Indian republic imposed on Pakistan some defeat that Russia is unable to deliver to Ukraine. It's because Russia is practically demanding complete political capitulation of it's enemy and 25% of its land while we demanded absolutely nothing. Let's see if the war will end in 4 days if we demands land or political capitulation from Pakistan. Russo Ukraine war would have ended in 4 days as well if Russian didn't demand anything from Ukraine and called it a day after firing some missiles at Ukranian airbases. Don't let propaganda delude you.
And no, even if they use CBRN weapons against our infantry, we ain't going to conquer Islamabad( or doing anything ground breaking) with 2500 odd T-72s and 1200 T-90s ( both are tin cans in modern battle field). Pakistan for all practical purpose achieved near pear parity with Indian military ( mostly due to Indian incompetency) . The current military capability of Indian Military forces isn't enough to impose it's will on Pakistan through force of arms. Chest thumbing without backing of strength is just delusion.




