India plans indigenous GPU chips in 24 months, says MeitY Secretary S Krishnan on AI strategy
MeitY Secretary S Krishnan outlines India's plans for indigenous GPU chips, Semicon 2.0, sovereign AI, data protection and new opportunities for the IT industry amid AI-driven transformation.
By Anoop Verma
ET Government
Updated On Nov 04, 2026 at 07:28 AM IST
India is moving towards developing indigenous GPU chips, expanding domestic semiconductor manufacturing and strengthening its capabilities across the artificial intelligence technology stack.
The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) is targeting the development of an Indian GPU chip over approximately 24 months, while India Semiconductor Mission 2.0 seeks to build a comprehensive ecosystem encompassing chip design, fabrication, advanced packaging, materials, equipment and research.
In a conversation with Anoop Verma,
S. Krishnan, Secretary, MeitY, outlines the government's strategy for reducing dependence on foreign technologies, commercialising indigenous processors such as SHAKTI and VEGA, and supporting the development of Indian AI models.
He also discusses the DEPA framework for secure data sharing, preparations for implementing the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, and the opportunities emerging from AI adoption across enterprises. Drawing a parallel with the Y2K era, Krishnan argues that artificial intelligence can create a new phase of growth for India's IT services industry, generating employment opportunities even as automation transforms existing jobs.
Edited excerpts:
On October 31, MeitY launched the DEPA for AI Training Handbook, outlining a framework for trusted data collaboration while protecting privacy and institutional control. How will this framework be implemented across government departments, research institutions and private enterprises? What mechanisms will ensure that Indian AI developers can access high-quality datasets without compromising citizens' data rights?
The DEPA mechanism is primarily about creating a secure framework through which data can be shared for research, artificial intelligence and other purposes without compromising privacy. We have already created AIKosh, which is operational and provides access to datasets for AI development. However, some datasets contain personally identifiable information, and even when such information is anonymised, there remains a possibility that anonymisation could be reversed.
This raises an important question: why should an entire dataset be supplied to a researcher when the requirement is only to undertake a particular analysis? We are therefore looking at a framework in which researchers can access and analyse data within a secure environment for a specified purpose. They can conduct their research, obtain their findings and take those findings away, but the underlying data remains within that protected environment.
The principle is similar to the reference sections of traditional libraries. There were books that could not be borrowed. Researchers could consult them, make notes and leave, but the material itself remained within the library. We are applying a comparable principle to digital datasets.
The National Health Authority is also adopting a similar approach for medical data, where protecting personal information is particularly important. Our objective is to establish good practices that can be adopted more widely by government agencies, private companies and research institutions. The framework could also be adopted internationally. It provides a way to facilitate data sharing and AI research while preserving privacy, anonymity and the conditions under which the data is made available. This is essential for enabling AI development without compromising citizens' rights.
India continues to depend substantially on imported GPUs and foreign technology providers for advanced AI computing. What is MeitY's long-term strategy for reducing these dependencies? Is India considering indigenous AI accelerators, domestic computing architectures and dedicated sovereign AI infrastructure for sensitive government and strategic applications?
The infrastructure required for artificial intelligence cannot be created overnight. We are taking a studied and comprehensive approach because the AI technology stack consists of five distinct layers, each of which needs to be addressed. The first layer is energy and power infrastructure. India is relatively well placed in this area, which is one reason why several international companies are interested in establishing data centres and AI computing facilities in the country.
The second layer is the chip itself, particularly the accelerator chips used for AI computing. Today, these chips are produced by a relatively small number of companies globally, and that concentration contributes to their high cost. Under India Semiconductor Mission 2.0, we intend to target the development of an indigenous GPU chip. The minister has also indicated this priority. We should have a GPU chip of our own. This will not happen overnight. It is a project that will require approximately 24 months, and we intend to work towards that objective.
The third layer is computing infrastructure, including servers and associated hardware. India already has companies capable of manufacturing servers. Companies such as VVDN, Kaynes and Avalon, among others, have developed manufacturing capabilities in this area. Several server components are also being manufactured domestically, supported by the Electronics Component Manufacturing Scheme and other initiatives.
There are still some components, particularly semiconductor chips, that are not manufactured entirely in India. Addressing those gaps is part of our strategy. Nevertheless, the capability to assemble and manufacture Indian servers already exists. C-DAC has developed its Rudra series of servers, including the AI-capable Rudra 3 series. These systems are increasingly being deployed, and technology transfer to Indian companies is helping expand domestic server manufacturing capabilities. We are also encouraging international companies establishing computing infrastructure in India to develop manufacturing facilities here.
The fourth layer consists of AI models. Under the IndiaAI Mission, we have supported more than 20 indigenous models. We hope that at least two of these will develop into frontier-level models, and we are continuing to support their development. At the same time, we recognise that large general-purpose models are not the only requirement. Smaller, specialised models can be highly effective in sectors such as agriculture, manufacturing, healthcare and education. These models can perform specific tasks efficiently while consuming less energy and computing power.
The fifth layer, and perhaps the most important from India's perspective, is applications. The real benefits of AI will emerge when it is deployed across businesses, industries and public services. Enterprise-level AI adoption remains limited. Individuals may be using AI tools, but many organisations have not integrated AI across their operations. Concerns about security, confidentiality and the possibility of sensitive business data being shared externally are among the reasons.
India has a significant opportunity to address these challenges and support enterprise-level AI adoption, not only domestically but internationally. By developing capabilities across all five layers, we can strengthen our technological resilience and eventually achieve greater strategic autonomy.
The government has approved Semicon 2.0 with an outlay of ₹1,27,500 crore, and notifications covering its six pillars were issued in August. How will this programme move India beyond semiconductor assembly and packaging towards advanced fabrication, indigenous chip design, equipment manufacturing and materials production? What measurable manufacturing milestones should India achieve over the next three to five years?
What we are attempting through India Semiconductor Mission 2.0 is to build the entire semiconductor ecosystem in the country. The first phase of the mission focused primarily on two areas: semiconductor wafer fabrication and the assembly and packaging of chips. We now recognise that India must develop capabilities across the entire value chain, beginning with chip design and extending to manufacturing equipment, materials, chemicals, advanced packaging and research and development.
Chip design is an important part of this strategy. Under the first phase, we introduced the Design Linked Incentive scheme, which has produced encouraging results. We identified more than 100 companies, of which 24 received assistance under the scheme. Subsequently, 15 of these 24 companies also attracted venture capital or other private investment. This demonstrates that government support can help companies develop technologies that subsequently attract commercial investment.
Under ISM 2.0, we intend to place greater emphasis on chip design, including strategically important chips such as AI accelerators. We are planning a higher allocation for this segment. We are also looking at different categories of chip design, including strategic chips and commercial chips that require support. The approach will include investment-based assistance rather than relying exclusively on grants. Support for electronic design automation tools will also continue.
The second major priority is developing the ecosystem of materials, machinery and equipment required for semiconductor manufacturing. A fabrication facility needs an extensive network of suppliers providing specialised gases, chemicals, materials and equipment. These supporting industries are essential for establishing a sustainable semiconductor manufacturing base. Under ISM 2.0, we intend to support their development. Several companies have already expressed interest and announced investment plans in these areas.
The third priority is to differentiate the support provided to various manufacturing activities. Semiconductor fabrication facilities will continue to receive substantial assistance, with support of 40%. Advanced packaging facilities will be eligible for assistance of 35%. The objective of providing higher support for advanced packaging is to encourage the industry to move towards more sophisticated technologies. Under the first phase, we attracted approximately eight or nine companies in conventional packaging. We now want the industry to progress to the next level.
Research and development will be another important component of the programme. We have established capabilities at the 28-nanometre technology node, but progressing towards more advanced nodes involves considerably higher costs. We therefore need to examine how research and technological development can help India move beyond 28 nanometres. This is an important area for future investment.
There are also emerging technologies, including display technologies and silicon photonics, where the government has supported research in various institutions. Some of these initiatives have produced promising results, and we now want to take them further towards practical and commercial outcomes. The overall objective of ISM 2.0 is to ensure that India develops a more complete and sustainable semiconductor ecosystem rather than remaining dependent on a few isolated segments of the manufacturing process.
Recent initiatives under the Chips to Startup programme and the Digital India RISC-V ecosystem have demonstrated growing domestic chip-design capabilities. What is the roadmap for commercialising indigenous processors such as SHAKTI and VEGA? Can India establish a significant market for domestically designed chips in government systems, defence, telecommunications, automotive electronics and industrial applications?
Both SHAKTI and VEGA processors have been developed indigenously using the RISC-V architecture. These developments demonstrate India's growing capabilities in processor design. As I mentioned, 24 companies received assistance under the Design Linked Incentive programme, and 15 of them subsequently raised venture capital funding. These companies are developing a range of products, including microcontrollers, flight controllers for drones, chips for smart meters and chips for CCTV cameras.
These are practical applications for which there is substantial demand. I believe the prospects for commercialising many of these products and taking them to a significantly higher level are strong. The government will continue to support this process. India also has a very large semiconductor market. Its current size is a little over $50 billion, and it is expected to approach $100 billion by 2030. The combined production from the semiconductor projects currently being developed will represent only a fraction of India's total consumption.
However, semiconductor chips serve different purposes, and there cannot be a single approach to developing the market. Different applications require different types of chips, with varying performance, reliability and security characteristics. We need to ensure that Indian chip-design companies have access to an adequate domestic market. That does not necessarily mean imposing restrictions across the entire consumer electronics market, because doing so could create unnecessary burdens.
There are, however, specific areas where the use of trusted and verified chips is particularly important from a security perspective. For example, CCTV cameras, industrial sensors, Internet of Things devices, drone flight controllers and smart meters can involve sensitive information. In such applications, data leakage or a compromise of system integrity can create serious security concerns.
It is therefore reasonable to ensure that the chips used in these systems come from trusted and verified sources. Indian companies could be encouraged to supply chips for such applications, provided their products meet the required standards of quality and performance. This approach can help establish a market for India-designed and India-made chips while also addressing important security requirements. It creates an opportunity for domestic semiconductor companies to develop commercially viable products without imposing unnecessary restrictions on the broader market.
The Digital Personal Data Protection framework is becoming increasingly important for government departments, digital platforms and private enterprises. How is MeitY preparing these organisations for compliance? What are the major challenges in implementing consent management, grievance redressal and regulatory requirements, particularly for smaller businesses and government departments?
We have provided an implementation period of 18 months, and the framework is intended to become operational by May 2027. The government had initially considered bringing forward the implementation date. However, several businesses represented that they would require more time to prepare for compliance. Taking these concerns into account, we have retained the implementation timeline.
We have stepped up our awareness campaign around the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, its provisions and the measures that organisations must take to comply with it. A number of awareness programmes are being conducted in Delhi and other centres across the country. We are also using social media, other communication channels and institutional mechanisms to ensure that businesses, government departments and other stakeholders understand their obligations.
This effort has already helped increase awareness of the legislation and the changes that organisations will need to introduce. The National Informatics Centre has also developed a product to assist government departments and other organisations handling substantial amounts of personal data in complying with the provisions of the Act. This tool is being widely publicised among government ministries.
The Cabinet Secretary has written to all secretaries in the Union government and the chief secretaries of states, emphasising the need to prioritise compliance with the DPDP Act. MeitY is supporting ministries and other government organisations in preparing for implementation. The objective is to ensure that institutions handling personal data are ready to meet their obligations when the relevant provisions become applicable.
At MeitY's June consultation on AI transformation of the IT services industry, you emphasised reskilling and technological upgrading rather than focusing exclusively on potential job losses. With generative and agentic AI transforming software development and business services, how should India's IT industry adapt its business model? What government-industry initiatives are being developed to protect competitiveness, create higher-value employment and prepare the workforce for AI-driven disruption?
NITI Aayog produced a paper last year examining the implications of AI for employment in India's IT and IT-enabled services sector. The paper pointed out that the sector currently employs approximately six million people. It anticipated that around two million existing jobs could become redundant because of technological changes, but that approximately four million additional jobs could be created. This would result in a net increase in employment.
The important question is how these new employment opportunities will emerge. I believe the principal opportunity lies in the deployment of AI across enterprises and organisations. This is an area where India has a substantial advantage. There is a parallel with the Y2K period, which created significant opportunities for the Indian IT industry. At that time, Indian companies were able to provide technology services to businesses around the world, and this contributed substantially to the growth of the sector.
AI could create a similar opportunity, although the nature of the work will be different. It is relatively easy to say that enterprises should adopt artificial intelligence. The actual process is much more complex. AI solutions must be designed around the specific requirements of each organisation. They must protect sensitive data, integrate with existing systems and be deployed effectively.
These are precisely the areas where India's IT industry can make an important contribution. We have a large pool of trained IT professionals with experience in developing, integrating and managing complex technology systems for organisations across the world. These capabilities can be applied to enterprise AI adoption on a substantial scale.
Indian companies can help businesses move from experimenting with AI tools to deploying AI throughout their operations. This will require technological adaptation and new skills, but it also presents a significant commercial opportunity. Our trained IT workforce gives India the capacity to undertake this work at scale and competitively. I believe this is where a major opportunity lies for the next phase of growth of India's IT services industry.
India plans indigenous GPU chips in 24 months, says MeitY Secretary S Krishnan on AI strategy