Army Aviation Corps : Updates & Discussions

GQGO8qUXMAAKwix
 
  • Like
Reactions: South block
Helicopters:
1.HAL Rudra = 75
2.HAL Dhruv = 76/95
3.HAL Cheetah = 160
4.HAL Cheetal = 04*
5.HAL Lancer = 12
6.HAL Chetak = 04*
7.HAL Chetan = 04*
8. HAL Prachand LCH = 05/95
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rajput Lion
Helicopters:
1.HAL Rudra = 75
2.HAL Dhruv = 76/95
3.HAL Cheetah = 160
4.HAL Cheetal = 04*
5.HAL Lancer = 12
6.HAL Chetak = 04*
7.HAL Chetan = 04*
8. HAL Prachand LCH = 05/95
We regularly get pics of Chetak from Southern Command. I think it's more than just 4.
 
Now that Modi ji has gone to Ukraine and hugged Zelensky, US may speed up all the delayed deliveries to us🤣
This opens up room for HAL to gauge the Army's interest in a LCH MK2 or even a much talked about MCH, based on the IMRH design.

Imo, scaling the LCH from a 5.6t to 7t class with extra armour and all other bells and whistles found on heavier AHs shouldn't be too much of a problem.

In fact, the ALH design should itself be stretched to create a 'medium' twin. The IMRH anyways weighs in at 13t. Latest avionics, new engines, modular weapons etc.

We should borrow a leaf from the Chinese on continuous iteration. Look what they've done with the 70s-era French-origin Super Frelon helo. They are now flying a 3rd or 4th gen variant of this bird as the Z-8L.

 
This opens up room for HAL to gauge the Army's interest in a LCH MK2 or even a much talked about MCH, based on the IMRH design.

Imo, scaling the LCH from a 5.6t to 7t class with extra armour and all other bells and whistles found on heavier AHs shouldn't be too much of a problem.

In fact, the ALH design should itself be stretched to create a 'medium' twin. The IMRH anyways weighs in at 13t. Latest avionics, new engines, modular weapons etc.

We should borrow a leaf from the Chinese on continuous iteration. Look what they've done with the 70s-era French-origin Super Frelon helo. They are now flying a 3rd or 4th gen variant of this bird as the Z-8L.

Let HAL integrate and certify Self Protection Suite & ATGM on LCH first.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Ashwin
This opens up room for HAL to gauge the Army's interest in a LCH MK2 or even a much talked about MCH, based on the IMRH design.

Imo, scaling the LCH from a 5.6t to 7t class with extra armour and all other bells and whistles found on heavier AHs shouldn't be too much of a problem.

In fact, the ALH design should itself be stretched to create a 'medium' twin. The IMRH anyways weighs in at 13t. Latest avionics, new engines, modular weapons etc.

We should borrow a leaf from the Chinese on continuous iteration. Look what they've done with the 70s-era French-origin Super Frelon helo. They are now flying a 3rd or 4th gen variant of this bird as the Z-8L.

You want to double the size of ALH? This is not vande bharat to put additional rakes and call it express. No one can do it.

Chinese is a terrible example. They milk the 70s design by adding more and more goodies. They didn't even try to create a clean-sheet design. They still rely on Mi-17s even after all the advancements in their aero industry.

There are issues with our MIC, but the helicopter development is not one of them. At least admire the fact that we have our own independent design without stealing. We are actually attempting to build our own 10+ ton helicopter design, not just one but two simultaneously. This is something that not even the europeans have accomplished. The so-called stolen "iteration" of chinese is a suboptimal solution that they have to live with. That will not be the case for us.
 
You want to double the size of ALH? This is not vande bharat to put additional rakes and call it express. No one can do it.

No, not double. Around 7t MTOW (up from 5.5t currently) is what I meant. Such a variant would fill the gap in HAL' s portfolio between 5t+ weight class and the 13t class. Something like what the AW159 Wildcat is to the Super Lynx 300 (not comparing weights)

At least admire the fact that we have our own independent design without stealing.
That I do. The basic ALH design has spawned a whole family of helos we can be proud of - from 3t+ to approx 6T. A 13T class is currently in the works. Imho, with a 7t class ALH++ in its line-up, HAL could possibly target civilian (offshore O&G, corporate) operators and provide an interim solution to the ICG which needs bigger helos for SAR. iirc, the IMRH has not yet been funded so there's scope for an improved Dhruv in the meantime.

It could be that have their hands full right now with D&D work for the NUH.
 
No, not double. Around 7t MTOW (up from 5.5t currently) is what I meant. Such a variant would fill the gap in HAL' s portfolio between 5t+ weight class and the 13t class. Something like what the AW159 Wildcat is to the Super Lynx 300 (not comparing weights)
Who determines the gap? The requirements are provided by the services. HAL has to assess the feasibility of developing such a new variant.

How did you reach Z-18 from that?

That I do. The basic ALH design has spawned a whole family of helos we can be proud of - from 3t+ to approx 6T. A 13T class is currently in the works. Imho, with a 7t class ALH++ in its line-up, HAL could possibly target civilian (offshore O&G, corporate) operators and provide an interim solution to the ICG which needs bigger helos for SAR. iirc, the IMRH has not yet been funded so there's scope for an improved Dhruv in the meantime.
LUH is a new development. LCH is based on ALH.

Selling a military-designed helicopter for high altitudes to civilians is difficult. It took decades of back and forth even to get the navy to agree on ALH. It will never be economical for a civilian to operate ALH. HAL is fundamentally a military aerospace company under MoD majority ownership. It is too much to expect them to make a new 7-ton helicopter for specific civilian use cases.
 
The requirements are provided by the services. HAL has to assess the feasibility of developing such a new variant

That goes without saying. However, there have been ocassions when HAL has developed and built ac on its own, despite clear lack of interest from the users. Case in point: HTT-40. Imo, adapting an existing design is far simpler than building a new ac. I was just pointing out than an opportunity exists. The final call rests with the users. For finding an opening in the civilian market, HAL will have to rely on its own research.

How did you reach Z-18 from that?

The point I wanted to make was that even a 70s-era relic can be kept relevant with iterative upgrades. HAL has developed several marks of the ALH but without airframe upgrades. Not that it's a bad thing but I'm advocating a bolder approach.

Selling a military-designed helicopter for high altitudes to civilians is difficult
And yet HAL has developed a civil version of the Dhruv with the older Turbomeca 2B2 engine. Imo, it all depends on marketing (and after-sales service). Civilian requirements are not as stringent as military ones. The biggest USP is spares and logistics are fully local. HAL could sell to govt-owned cos like Pawan Hans. iirc they have a deal with them.

In any case, if Airbus can pitch a locally-built H125/Fennec (another high alt helo) to the civil market, so can HAL.


It took decades of back and forth even to get the navy to agree on ALH
That was largely because of poor communication by HAL.


It will never be economical for a civilian to operate ALH.
Commonality of parts with mil helos should help keep costs low.

HAL is fundamentally a military aerospace company under MoD majority ownership
Agree. But the civilian demand is increasing. HAL is actively positioning itself in the market as a local alternative to foreign manufacturers.

It is too much to expect them to make a new 7-ton helicopter for specific civilian use cases.
Who said anything about new? I was talking about a stretched version with improved features. The Dhruv needs an re-brand to appeal to commercial users, since it has been in the market for a while. Imo, extending the cabin by 2-3m, adding extra seats and other role-specific equipment should help it sell.
 
That goes without saying. However, there have been ocassions when HAL has developed and built ac on its own, despite clear lack of interest from the users. Case in point: HTT-40.
Lol. You are giving the opposite. I mentioned a requirement from services, not confidence. There has always been a need for 180 basic trainers, and the HTT-40 was developed to meet that requirement.

The point I wanted to make was that even a 70s-era relic can be kept relevant with iterative upgrades. HAL has developed several marks of the ALH but without airframe upgrades. Not that it's a bad thing but I'm advocating a bolder approach.
That doesn't make sense. Which helicopter did they not upgrade pre ALH? They are still producing upgraded Alouettes.

They continuously improved the ALH design with multiple versions. The latest maritime UHM is even getting Indian avionics. There is nothing to be inspired by the Chinese way of developing helicopters.

And yet HAL has developed a civil version of the Dhruv with the older Turbomeca 2B2 engine. Imo, it all depends on marketing (and after-sales service). Civilian requirements are not as stringent as military ones. The biggest USP is spares and logistics are fully local. HAL could sell to govt-owned cos like Pawan Hans. iirc they have a deal with them.
No one is stopping them from creating a civil version. The old civil ALH is just the Mk1 with civil recertification, which was a huge failure due to the reasons I listed.

Local spared wont be much helpful if its very expensive which is the case here. ALH is still 40-50% imported.

That was largely because of poor communication by HAL.
No, it is not designed for shipborne operations. "Communication" will not fix the fact that it is an inferior product for sea-level altitude operations. A single product cannot do justice to the opposing requirements and constraints of high and low altitudes.

They have learned the lessons, so they are developing different versions of the same class under IMRH/DBMRH in parallel.

Who said anything about new? I was talking about a stretched version with improved features. The Dhruv needs an re-brand to appeal to commercial users, since it has been in the market for a while. Imo, extending the cabin by 2-3m, adding extra seats and other role-specific equipment should help it sell.
The stretched version would be a new helicopter altogether. These kinds of comments come from a lack of understanding the complexities of aeronautical development. You can't just increase the size and rebrand it as MAX PRO like in electronics. It is a huge undertaking. As a military PSU its not reasonable to expect HAL to undertake such a development without assured market opportunity which they get from services.
 

As Army awaits new utility helicopters, Cheetah, Cheetal remain lifelines in high altitude areas

The indigenous Light Utility Helicopter, manufactured by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited, meant to replace the Cheetah and Chetak is taking shape but behind schedule

While the Army’s efforts to replace the vintage Cheetah and Chetak utility helicopters continues, officials at the Aviation Brigade in Leh explained how they along with the Cheetal as well as the Advanced Light Helicopters (ALH) continue to remain a lifeline for supporting troops in the high altitude areas, including Siachen glacier.

The indigenous Light Utility Helicopter (LUH), manufactured by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL), meant to replace the Cheetah and Chetak is taking shape but behind schedule, officials said. “The Army needs 225 LUH and a deal for 110 LUH is currently in the cost negotiation stage,” a defence source stated. Their induction in enough numbers is going to take sometime, another source said.

Lifeline in high altitude​

Officers and technicians at the Army Aviation Brigade in Leh, which operates ALH, Cheetals and Unmanned Aerial vehicles, explained how these helicopters are a lifeline in supplying logistics, casualty evacuation among other roles in the forward most areas of Ladakh. The Cheetal is an upgraded version of the Cheetah, featuring the same engine as the ALH MK1 and Mk2, explained Maj. Ayush Devliyal from the Corps of Electronics and Mechanical Engineers (EME). The Cheetal holds the record for landing at an altitude of 23,000 feet.

Since the May 2020 standoff with China in Eastern Ladakh, which is still underway, the Army has carried a major reorientation of troops towards the Line of Actual Control (LAC) and several thousand troops were inducted into the area which meant extending the logistics and supply chains, both by road and through the air to support them. Army Aviation too has upped its tempo of operations to cater to the requirements of troops support, surveillance and being ready for operations if needed.

Giving a sense of their tasks, Col. Randeep Pathania, Commanding Officer of the ALH squadron, noted how varied the terrain is. We have icy heights of glacier, we have heights but dry deserts of Eastern Ladakh, we have hilly terrain or high mountains of Western Ladakh which is Drass and Kargil, he noted. “Each sector we have fragmented here is unique and definitely a very challenging and difficult terrain, he said speaking to a few visiting journalists last weekend. We need to understand the machine and all aspects related to the machine so that we can undertake flying here. The tasks here are very essential.”

The entire aim is to have synergy between, not only with other aviation assets, but also with ground formations, observed Lt. Col. Amit Ansal also from EME. “The Aviation squadron regularly practices with various formations so that one plan can come out and the role is understood by one and all during operations.”

Highlighting an important aspect, Brig. Gurdeep Singh commanding the Aviation Brigade said the civil administration also requisitions them for number of tasks. The recently concluded Lok Sabha elections, there are some areas which even in summers are cut off, so induction of polling officials along with Electronic Voting Machines (EVM), we did that, he said. “Number of posts in Zanskar area, where we flew almost 80 hours utilising a number of helicopters for inducting polling officials, security officials and EVMs and de-inducting them.”

Army Aviation has three Brigades at Leh, Missamari and Jodhpur operating around 190 Cheetah, Chetak and Cheetal helicopters, 145 ALH, 75 of which are the Rudra weaponised variants and 25 ALH Mk-III on order in addition to the Light Combat Helicopter under induction. Of the 190 Cheetah, Chetaks, and Cheetals in service, around 134 helicopters or over 70% of them are over 30 years old, as reported by The Hindu earlier.
 
Army may have got only 5 but they are most keen on this platforms use so far than the IAF . Nice pics

In a historic milestone, the Indian Army’s LCH successfully conducted high-altitude firing. Designed for precision in extreme terrains, Prachand’s performance reinforces India's capability in high-altitude operations.




1731420460203.png

1731420473080.png

1731420484471.png