Avantgard - 27 times speed of sound.

BMD

Senior member
Dec 4, 2017
25,494
4,396
Official: Russian weapon 27 times faster than speed of sound

Official: Russian weapon 27 times faster than speed of sound


VLADIMIR ISACHENKOV

Associated PressDecember 27, 2018

e50c2c4bd4a54de6bf7886e2ae594b18.jpg

View photos

Russian President Vladimir Putin, left, and Chief of General Staff of Russia Valery Gerasimov oversee the test launch of the Avangard hypersonic glide vehicle from the Defense Ministry's control room in Moscow, Russia, Wednesday, Dec. 26, 2018. In the test, the Avangard was launched from the Dombarovskiy missile base in the southern Ural Mountains. The Kremlin says it successfully hit a designated practice target on the Kura shooting range on Kamchatka, 6,000 kilometers (3,700 miles) away. (Mikhail Klimentyev, Sputnik, Kremlin Pool Photo via AP)

More
MOSCOW (AP) — Russia's new strategic weapon has rendered any missile defenses useless at a small fraction of their cost, officials said Thursday.

The Avangard hypersonic glide vehicle flies 27 times faster than the speed of sound, making it impossible to intercept, Deputy Prime Minister Yuri Borisov told Russian state television.

The new weapon "essentially makes missile defenses useless," he said.

Borisov spoke a day after Russian President Vladimir Putin oversaw what he described as the conclusive successful test of the Avangard and hailed it as a reliable guarantee of Russia's security for decades to come.

In Wednesday's test, the weapon was launched from the Dombarovskiy missile base in the southern Ural Mountains. The Kremlin said it successfully hit a practice target on the Kura shooting range on Kamchatka, 6,000 kilometers (3,700 miles) away.

The Defense Ministry released footage from the test launch, in which a ballistic missile could be seen blasting from a silo in a cloud of smoke, but it hasn't released any images of the vehicle itself.

Putin said the Avangard will enter service with the Russian Strategic Missile Forces next year.

The test comes amid bitter tensions in Russia-U.S. relations, which have been strained over the Ukrainian crisis, the war in Syria and the allegations of Moscow's meddling in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

Sergei Ivanov, a former Russian defense minister, said in televised comments that the Avangard constantly changes its course and altitude as it flies through the atmosphere.

He emphasized that unlike previous nuclear warheads fitted to intercontinental ballistic missiles that follow a predictable trajectory allowing it to calculate the spot where they can be intercepted, the Avangard chaotically zigzags on its path to its target, making it impossible to predict the weapon's location.

A smiling Ivanov likened the weapon's flight through the atmosphere to a pebble skipping off the surface of water.

Ivanov, who now serves as Putin's adviser, said the Avangard could be fitted to the Soviet-made UR-100UTTKh intercontinental ballistic missile, which is code-named SS-19 Stiletto by NATO.

He noted that Russia has a stockpile of several dozen such missiles, which are in a factory-mint condition and not filled with fuel, allowing them to serve for a long time to come. Ivanov added that they could be put in existing silos, sharply reducing the costs of Avangard's deployment.

"The Avangard has cost hundreds of times less than what the U.S. has spent on its missile defense," Ivanov said.

He noted that Russia began to develop the Avangard after the 2002 U.S. withdrew from the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty and started to develop defenses against ballistic missiles.

Moscow feared that the U.S. missile shield could erode its nuclear deterrent, and Putin announced in 2004 that Russia was working on a new hypersonic weapon.

Ivanov recalled that when Russian officials warned their U.S. counterparts about the new weapon program at the time, American officials were openly skeptical about Russia's ability to carry out its plan.

"We aren't involved in saber-rattling, we simply ensured our security for decades to come," he said.
 
So Trump's stupid tweets caused NK to build 90 Tonner Monster ICBM and Russia to Build world's facted HGV.
Power of social media in the hands of a stupid.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Neo
So Trump's stupid tweets caused NK to build 90 Tonner Monster ICBM and Russia to Build world's facted HGV.
Power of social media in the hands of a stupid.

The fact that one might think NK or Russia wouldn't have built the weapons they deem necessary for their national security if it wasn't for some tweets shows who's the stupid one here.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Ginvincible
I'm dubious about Mach 27. That's well over 8km/s, which is the speed of a low Earth orbit. If the delivery vehicle was faster than that it would be classed as a FOBS, which is banned by the Outer Space Treaty. I guess it depends where you are measuring the speed of sound though. It can be as low as 276m/s at 80km altitude, which would put it at 7.45km/s.

Speed of sound - Wikipedia
 
Here is some information about the nuclear-powered cruise missile allegedly doing M2.9, which is possible since fuel consumption isn't an issue.

 
The fact that one might think NK or Russia wouldn't have built the weapons they deem necessary for their national security if it wasn't for some tweets shows who's the stupid one here.
The stupid ones are the people who think these weapons have only been in design and development for 12-18 months.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Ashwin and Parthu
The stupid ones are the people who think these weapons have only been in design and development for 12-18 months.
Pakistan has an ICBM designed. But isn't being built and tested.
Some Indian provocation will make it happen.
So "oh the wise one" Nobel prize winner.....all I am saying is ...well sod it.
 
Pakistan has an ICBM designed. But isn't being built and tested.
Some Indian provocation will make it happen.
So "oh the wise one" Nobel prize winner.....all I am saying is ...well sod it.
Given the geographical location of Pakistan and India, how exactly would an ICBM be useful in a conflict between the two?
 
Given the geographical location of Pakistan and India, how exactly would an ICBM be useful in a conflict between the two?
They want one to circumnavigate the globe before finding its designated target in India. They also have the designs & the manufacturing capacities to build one. It's only the goodness of their hearts which has prevented this from becoming a reality. Eating grass is also not an obstacle. As one of their ex PM's prophesied.
 
They want one to circumnavigate the globe before finding its designated target in India. They also have the designs & the manufacturing capacities to build one. It's only the goodness of their hearts which has prevented this from becoming a reality. Eating grass is also not an obstacle. As one of their ex PM's prophesied.
YURR TUITT :LOL::ROFLMAO::LOL: