Collision between aircrafts happen, nothing can be done about it.
Sorry for loss of life.
Sorry for loss of life.
May God rest their souls in peace.Captain Sébastien Mabire and Lieutenant Matthis Laurens died in the crash involving two military aircraft on Wednesday 14 August in Meurthe-et-Moselle, Emmanuel Macron announced late this evening on X, formerly Twitter.
So you're not denying EFT's claim about 'digital stealth', alright that's clear then, because EFT wouldn't spread a 'hoax' since that would actually be detrimental to them. And would destroy their credibility.I haven't looked at what they are actually claiming. So far it's all just EW, called by another name.
Of course the stealth fighters also have EW, so in any situation the stealth aircraft would have the advantage of both.
Europe is late to the party. The US had the F117 in 1980
I looked at the link now...it says EW making it 'stealthy'. They say it is good. I don't know. In any case it doesn't have stealth airframe. Apple for apple EW, a stealth aircraft would have the advantage.So you're not denying EFT's claim about 'digital stealth', alright that's clear then, because EFT wouldn't spread a 'hoax' since that would actually be detrimental to them. And would destroy their credibility.
As long as the goal is the same, which is to avoid radar detection, then it's all the same to me, especially since the F-35 has never been confirmed to have 'digital stealth' capabilities, right?I looked at the link now...it says EW making it 'stealthy'. They say it is good. I don't know. In any case it doesn't have stealth airframe. Apple for apple EW, a stealth aircraft would have the advantage.
You really should google and read lots of stuff to learn. You are making basic errors in your thinking. Earlier it was through that it was deliberate. However now I think it's lack of knowledge and a belief that what you say makes sense.As long as the goal is the same, which is to avoid radar detection, then it's all the same to me, especially since the F-35 has never been confirmed to have 'digital stealth' capabilities, right?
It hasn't been a good weekThank you
As far as I've read, there are no claims whatsoever about the digital stealth capabilities of the F-35.You really should google and read lots of stuff to learn. You are making basic errors in your thinking. Earlier it was through that it was deliberate. However now I think it's lack of knowledge and a belief that what you say makes sense.
start with info from the manufacture of the F-35 EW
Americans know all too-well about Active Cancellation. They even tried that in B-2 bomber but were not successful. F-35 Block-4 may include it in its EW package. We've to remember that because of lower RCS and peaks, VLO jets' EW/ECM/EA/AC is lot stronger than jets that carry their payload outside.As far as I've read, there are no claims whatsoever about the digital stealth capabilities of the F-35.
Without an official claim from the vendor, it's all just speculation, not fact, this includes the Rafale. To my knowledge, only the EFT has been bold enough to claim such technology.Americans know all too-well about Active Cancellation. They even tried that in B-2 bomber but were not successful. F-35 Block-4 may include it in its EW package. We've to remember that because of lower RCS and peaks, VLO jets' EW/ECM/EA/AC is lot stronger than jets that carry their payload outside.
F-35 Block-4 may beat Rafale even in "Active Stealth". Uncle Sam's technological prowess must never be underestimated, IMO.
@Picdelamirand-oil is an "official" word from France/Dassault about Rafale's Active Stealth. Rafale's Active Stealth continues to evolve in every tranche while EFT, F-35 and surprise surprise even India with its GaN ASPJ pods is trying to follow Rafale's AS.Without an official claim from the vendor, it's all just speculation, not fact, this includes the Rafale. To my knowledge, only the EFT has been bold enough to claim such technology.
If it wasn't for the US cutting Russia out of the market through CAATSA sanctions. The Rafale production would only be for the French. If you aren't buying US. You only have the Eurofighter and Rafale. Unless you want CAATSA sanctions
The only thing good about the Rafale is its public relations sales team. It's not the 1960-80's obsolete tech.
Pic's version of selling the bird. F1 is the best, followed by, it wasn't that good but F2 is the best, etc now to F4.1, still the same story. A tarted-up Mirage, with a new name.
While in reality, this is pic defending the Rafale ....
Without an official claim from the vendor, it's all just speculation, not fact, this includes the Rafale. To my knowledge, only the EFT has been bold enough to claim such technology.
Spectra used 25% of the whole Rafale R&D effort. It is not for nothing.Does the Rafale also have digital stealth capability like the EFT? It is claimed "to be able to digitally hide its signature, becoming invisible to radar".
Eurofighter Typhoon: Digital Stealth | Eurofighter Typhoon
www.eurofighter.com
Strangely it was the french that invented the first stealth frigate, the Lafayette class. And USA are producing in 2024 non stealth destroyers (Arleigh Burke) for them selves....I haven't looked at what they are actually claiming. So far it's all just EW, called by another name.
Of course the stealth fighters also have EW, so in any situation the stealth aircraft would have the advantage of both.
Europe is late to the party. The US had the F117 in 1980
Pretty much all F35 customers to date have been previous F16 & F18 operators.Pretty much all Rafale customers to date have been previous Mirage operators.
Indonesia is the only exception, and to be fair, they have only recently become rich enough to afford such technologies.