Yup! You need to get over your high moral ground.
Er... No. They do not exist. It goes against the Quran.
In a truly Muslim society, shirk has to be completely eliminated, so no khaffirs like Hindus can exist. That alone disqualifies Islam for pluralism. Then come the takfiris, ie, if you are Sunni then Shias have to be eliminated. And if you are a specific type of Sunni, like a Deobandi, then the Sufis must be eliminated. And so on. So Islam is totalitarian. Wahhabism and other Salafi schools are very strict about this. They absolutely hate Muslim Indians for example.
There are only 10 secular Islamic majority countries, most of them by name only. The only reason minorities exist in Islamic countries is because of Western foreign aid and influence. There's only 1 secular country in the ME, and that now belongs to Turdogan.
The other 9 are secular because they are extremely poor and get money from the West. It's also for self-protection, 'cause going theocratic can invite regime change from the poweful West. Turkey is secular because they want to get into the EU. 2 other Muslim countries are in Europe. Indonesia is secular because of tourism money, but they have started slowly becoming theocratic.
Indonesian businesses are concerned a new ban on sex outside marriage could deter visitors.
www.bbc.com
So radicalism is on the rise even in Indonesia.
Not sure,what do you understand by democracy.
For me, it's about protecting the smallest minorty i.e. an individual's inalienable rights like freedom of speech, expression, rule of law, etc.
That's something else entirely. Only democracies are capable of protecting minorities, that's a given. But it's via the manipulation of the majority that you get different results.
This will be a long post.
The left generates votes by inspiring sympathy from the bleeding hearts of the majority. How? You keep the minority poor and suppressed. So the Muslims in India and blacks in America are the best examples of that. As long as the minority is suppressed, pity votes are generated, and the bleeding hearts also keep right wing extremism in check. It's also when the majority population starts losing their ability to think via ridiculous amounts of media-controlled propaganda.
The right generates votes via unity and nationalism. They build national pride and are extremely pro-freedom, pro-education and pro-business. They inspire national pride by bringing up historical successes and that it can be rebuilt again. Which is why the left manipulates textbooks and focuses on destroying the pride of the majority. And the right wing also benefits minorities. No more bleeding hearts for Muslims in India if they also become rich and educated after all. They just won't have much political power in exchange.
But the issue with both left and right wing is the crazies on either side get more voice and they slowly gain power and eventually decide the best course for unity is to destroy the minorities. Both the left and right believe in unity in singularity. In India, the right has only one type of crazy. But the left has two types, Islamic radicals, who are not very powerful, and communists, who are extremely powerful.
Otoh, the best system for minorities is if the right wing becomes the most powerful, but in a highly rich and educated pluralistic democratic society. The best example is Japan. The LDP is their version of BJP and has held power ever since 1958. They lost power only twice for very short durations, just 5 years in total out of 65 years. That's why their public discipline and traditionlism is extremely well-known.
So you need an opposing force in democracies. Against the left, you need right wing. Against the right, you need left. And against both, you need money and education. And once a population has money and education, the right wing is the best bet for safety and stability, like in Japan.
And that's also why the left focuses on destroying money and education once a country gets it, like what's happening in the US today. That's why the US is not a proper democracy, the people there are quite foolish. They prefer party over country.
The left is attempting to do the same in Japan. Thankfully they are not stupid, right wing all the way.
In India, the global left is attempting this BS.
I hope the govt and companies do not go overboard with it. Equality is well and good, but equity is extremely toxic and riddled in communism.
As for Islamic countries, it's impossible for such a balanced democratic system to exist. The right wing always wins, and the Quran tells them to destroy everyone else. The only alternative is to stop taking the Quran seriously while getting rid of Sharia.
It's simple really. In India, if the BJP is defeated, then communism will take over, and once that happens, Islam will be eliminated en masse. And if Congress is defeated before the population becomes rich and educated, then some-Hitler type figure will show up and eliminate Islam. So either way Muslims will get screwed, which is why Indian mullahs in mosques are pushing Muslim children towards majority schools instead of madrassas while trying their best to suppress radicalism. They have understood how this game works, very late, but better late than never. The madrassas are funded by the left to keep Muslims poor and uneducated.
Hence:
Earlier, Assam CM Himanta Biswa Sarma in Karnataka claimed that his government has removed 600 madrassas in Assam
www.hindustantimes.com
So triple talaq, UCC, anti-conversion, all of these laws are being brought in to benefit Muslims.
Makes sense now?
And why Muslims can potentially get eliminated in India on those two extremes? Well, who the hell's gonna be strong enough to stop it? But there's a caveat. Only the left will destroy Muslims, not the right. And this is what bothers global communists the most.
So, as per communism, pluralism and nationalism cannot go hand-in-hand, you have to choose one. So the Chinese are nationalists but favor only ethnic Han Chinese and no religion. As the Japanese lady said, you need an oppressor and an oppressed for communism to work before it's fully established, like in China. But India is the only global exception to this rule because of Hinduism. What they have discovered is the more powerful and influential the majority becomes, the minorities benefit even more than the majority. So it's upended all their beliefs and theories in just a few short years.
That's why there have been multiple massive attacks on Hinduism happening the last few years via the media internationally. That's also why the Khalistan movement has been re-energized. When Modi came to power, the global left used their usual tools of attack and it all backfired because they assumed Hinduism is just another basic right wing system. So they decided to use shaming tactics against both development and religion, and they overdid it. The best example of that is the current situation with Maldives. Then recall Stalin (the best leftist name there is) relating Hinduism with a disease, that backfired spectacularly.
The global left is currently using poverty and hunger as a shaming tactic, 'cause they failed on the overall development front, like infrastructure and services, which have become better than developed countries in some cases. They are unable to attack Hindiusm either, which is why you don't see many Western articles on the new Ram Mandir outside of some pity-generation articles, which are aimed at their own domestic audience rather than shaming Hindus.
Hinduism has become communism's greatest enemy. And that's the reason why Muslims will benefit from such a pluralistic system. India is the only country in the world where Muslims can safely climb to the peak of what they can achieve while almost completely suppressing the eventual downward spiral all Quranic societies are condemned to.
It's blip on a large time scale.
It's within a generation. They target children in mosques. Then it's permanent until an outsider comes in and changes things violently.
Similarly the trans agenda in the US is also targeting children.
Pretty much every Muslim country on the planet.
Here's an explanation of the "Muslims are peaceful" argument.
Basically, non-Muslim societies, democracies, have various means to keep extremism in check. Muslim societies do not.
Indonesia, Tunisia, Turkey, Myanmar etc. Are doing fine.
Tunisia has relations with the EU. They have an association agreement, so the EU acts as the opposing force. The same as Turkey, Bosnia and Albania.
Myanmar, almost 90% Buddhist? Are you referring to Malaysia? Malaysia is doing well because non-Muslims, the local Chinese, control over 80% of their economy. So Muslims elect the leader, but the Chinese (including China) control the leader. It's like the new Maldives.
Indonesia has the West, India and China acting as an opposing force due to tourism, investments and the overall security situation in general. Both countries (Malaysia included) understand they could become battlegrounds in a major war, so politics trumps religion. They are fearful of their internal security situation too.
There's not a single Muslim country today that stands on its own. The entire Muslim world is completely dependent on Christians, khaffirs and atheists. It's all 'cause Islam was made for war, not nation-building. There's a massive difference in philosophy. None of the Five Pillars of Islam required to go to heaven include nation-building. It's all about surrendering your dopamine system to someone else who will control your life and steal your wealth.
In Islam, there are two pillars for breaking the dopamine system, Shahada and Silat. And there are two pillars concerning the transfer of wealth to the clergy, Zakat and Hajj, one takes away wealth of the rich in the name of alms, the other takes away wealth from everyone and drops it in a center of power that benefits only a specific kind of clergy. And Sawm, while good, only benefits the self.
Otoh, in Hinduism, nation-building and being responsible for someone else (having dependents for example, practising a profession, running a business etc), seeking truth (knowledge) and chasing excellence in all acts are the only ways of going to heaven, while doing all this on a foundation of good deeds (karma). Prayers, hymns, fasting, pilgrimages and alms are only meant to improve your current life while alive because they only serves the physical senses, not the soul, at best increases karma. These are not a path to heaven. So completely opposite philosophies at play here. The Hindu concept of heaven is also different, even though both Hinduism and Islam believe in one omnipotent, omnipresent, and omniscient God.
So, without a change in philosophy, Quranic societies will always go into a downward spiral. There's quite literally not a single exception possible without a non-Muslim opposing force acting against it in a constructive manner, and, to the chagrin of communists, only Hinduism has been proven to do that. All other religions and systems hate and suppress Islam in its entirety, including Islam itself.
www.thesun.co.uk
