Fight Against Corruption- Discussion

Govt to take action against 2.2 lakh companies for not filing annual returns for 2 years
The government today said it will take action against over 2.25 lakh companies as they have not filed requisite financial statement for 2015-16 and 2016-17.

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has already struck off over 2.26 lakh companies for non-filing of financial statements or annual returns for a continuous period of two years or more.

"During the financial year 2018-19, a total of 2,25,910 companies have also been identified for action under section 248 of the (Companies) Act for non-filing of due returns for the financial year 2015-16 and 2016-17," Minister of State for Corporate Affairs P P Chaudhary said in a written reply to the Lok Sabha.

"Due procedure shall be followed by Registrars of Companies (ROCs) before striking off names of the companies," he added.

Section 248 of the Companies Act -- which is implemented by the corporate affairs ministry -- provides powers to strike off names of companies from the register on various grounds, including for being inactive for long.
Govt to take action against 2.2 lakh companies for not filing annual returns for 2 years
 
*12 very senior officers of rank of Chief Commissioners, Principal Commissioners, Commissioners of Income Tax department given compulsorily retirement under Rule 56 by Finance Ministry : Fin Min Sources*

1. Ashok Agarwal (IRS 1985), Joint Commissioner Income Tax
Former Dy director, ED. Remained suspended from 1999 to 2014. Serious complaints of corruption and major extortion from businessmen accused of helping the alleged Godman Chandraswami. CBI launched prosecution on charge of acquiring disproportionate assets worth RS 12 Crore in 2005. Departmental proceedings initiated in early 2000. Initiated more than 40 litigations in CAT, High Court, and Supreme Court to thwart any action and get the departmental proceedings and CBI chargesheets quashed. Hires eminent lawyers like Ram Jethmalalani to defend his cases.
Either Colludes with or coerce departmental officers and government counsels / empaneled lawyers in CAT/High Courts to provide /leak department’s confidential internal documents and force them to dilute his departmental/ prosecution cases. Recently Initiated proceeding in High Court to direct the Government for appointing him as member of CBDT.
2. S K Srivastava ( IRS 1989) – Commissioner( Appeal), NOIDA
Accused of sexual harassment to two lady IRS officers of Commissioner rank.
Managed to get tax evasions petition filed through a Member of Parliament ( Jai Narayan Nishad) stating that the two lady IRS officers of Commissioner rank ( who were in vigilance department when S K Srivastava was suspended) had received huge income from corruption and prostitution. He pressurized the assessing officers to pass orders adding alleged income of bribery and prostitution in their incomes. He also pressurized the commissioner (appeal) to confirm the order. Now the appeals are lying pending in the ITAT. He threatens to expose every officer who does not cooperate with him. Recently, as an instance, he filed a contempt petition against Former Revenue Secretary and the Establishment Officer in a frivolous case. It is his standard tactics to coerce the senior and other departmental officer to fall in his line or else he starts defamatory campaign against such officers.
On the one hand, he has been prolonging conclusion of departmental inquiry cases for the last 10 years by filing as many as 75 petitions in CAT, High Court, and Supreme Court and on the other hand, he has approached UPSC to defer the cases of promotion of his batch and his juniors. Also, he has approached the UPSC to defer the cases of promotion of the batches of the two lady officers and their junior batches. As a result , promotion of three batches are held up for the last two three years. He has been pressurizing for being promoted as Chief Commissioner of Income Tax.
In an as many as eight cases, High Court and CAT have passed strictures and warning and imposed fines for his scandalous allegations against the lady officers and other higher officers. In one case he has been order to undergo civil imprisonment of 15 days for his scandalous allegations against former Chairman and Members of CBDT. He has also filed contempt petitions against former Secretary Revenue.
He also engaged Jethmalani to defend his cases in courts. Either Colludes with or coerce departmental officers and government counsels / empaneled lawyers in CAT/High Courts to provide /leak department’s confidential internal documents and force them to dilute his departmental/ prosecution cases.
3. Shri Homi Rajvansh (IRS 1985 DOB 16.06.61)
a. He had acquired movable and immovable assets worth Rs.3,17,78,462/- in the name of self and his family members.
b. These movable and immovable properties had allegedly been acquired by abusing his official position and by corrupt and illegal means.
c. These movable and immovable properties were acquired without obtaining any prior permission or giving any intimation in this regard to Competent Authority in violation of Rules 18(2) and 18(3) of CCS (Conduct) Rules.
d. Shri Homi Rajvansh was arrested by CBI after absconding from his Headquarters to evade arrest. He was also placed under suspension following his arrest.
e. Shri Homi Rajvansh, while on deputation to NAFED as Addl. Managing Director had allegedly advanced huge amounts (totalling about Rupees Two hundred and Ninety-One crores) to 9 companies without obtaining approval of Competent Authority.
f. These funds were released in unauthorized and irregular manner without ensuring adherence to clauses of agreements and without obtaining bank guarantees.
g. These companies defaulted on repayment and thus caused huge financial loss of hundreds of Crores to NAFED..
h. Shri Homi Rajvansh has been delaying finalization of disciplinary proceedings by resorting to litigation and raising technical and procedural issues. Has been delaying cases for more than ten years by indulging in multitude of litigations
Either Colludes with or coerce departmental officers and government counsels / empaneled lawyers in CAT/High Courts to provide /leak department’s confidential internal documents and force them to dilute his departmental/ prosecution cases.
4. Shri B B Rajendra Prasad (92092)
CBI, Visakhapatnam registered a case RC 08(A)/2017-CBI VSP on 01.05.2017 against Shri B.B. Rajendra Prasad on the allegations of obtaining illegal gratification in lieu of passing favorable appeal order in one case.
Shri B.B. Rajendra Prasad was arrested by the CBI and the bribe consideration was recovered. He was also placed under suspension on 02.05.2017 following his arrest by CBI.
CVC also directed vigilance inspection of the orders passed by Shri B.B. Rajendra Prasad during his tenure as CIT(A)-30, Mumbai.
Shri B.B. Rajendra Prasad had allegedly acquired assets to the tune of Rs. 2.73 Crores, which are disproportionate to his known sources of income.
CBI has filed a DA case against Shri B.B. Rajendra Prasad on 31.07.2017.
5 .Shri Ajoy Kumar Singh CIT, (87067)
a. CBI, ACB, Mumbai, had registered a Disproportionate Assets (DA) case (RC: 8(A)/ 2007-Mum) against Shri Ajoy Kumar Singh, the then Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai, on 22.02.2007.
b. Shri Ajoy Kumar Singh was arrested by the CBI in connection with the case.
c. He was also placed under suspension w.e.f. 25.10.2009 following his arrest by CBI.
d. Hon’ble High Court of Bombay, vide order dated 08.10.2009 directed the CBI to file the Charge sheet on the basis of its report dated 08.09.2009.
e. Hon’ble High Court of Bombay had also directed the Income Tax Department to take expeditious action against Shri Ajoy Kumar Singh under the Service Rules applicable to him on the basis of CBI report dated 08.09.2009.
f. Criminal Prosecution is pending against Shri Ajoy Kumar Singh and the matter is being processed for initiation of disciplinary proceedings as advised by CVC and decided by Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of Shri Ajoy Kumar Singh (87067) in respect of the DA case filed against him by CBI.
6 . SHRI B. ARULAPPA, CIT ( 90116)
a. Shri B. Arulappa proved to be ineffective as a Supervisory officer as he failed to ensure assignment of important cases having large tax implication to senior and experienced officers.
b. Shri B. Arulappa proved to be ineffective as a Supervisory officer as he failed to ensure that pending major audit objections are duly answered and settled which resulted in loss of RS 15.69 Crores.
c. Shri B. Arulappa proved to be ineffective as a Supervisory officer as he failed to monitor whether the re-opened assessment involving major RAP objection is completed to its logical conclusion as mandated in the Manual of Office Procedure and Audit Manual.
d. Assessment completed by the ITO, Ward 3(3), Trichy on 31.03.2015 in the case of M/s. Vasan Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. for assessment year 2009-10 (which was reopened u/s 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961) by accepting the income returned and without discussing any of the issues raised in the audit objections raises serious doubts about the integrity of Shri B. Arulappa for assigning the case to the junior most officer in his charge.
7. Shri Alok Kumar Mitra (Civil List No. 92030)
Involved in many cases of corruptions and extortion. Passed many wrong and malafide assessment orders which were later on reversed by the appellate authorities.
Despite several complaints and departmental findings against him he managed to avoid action by filing cases in CAT etc.
Either Colludes with or coerce departmental officers and government counsels / empaneled lawyers in CAT/High Courts to provide /leak department’s confidential internal documents and force them to dilute his departmental/ prosecution cases.
8. Chander Saini Bharti (94086)
a. Shri Chander Sain Bharti was apprehended by CBI in connection with a trap case and the bribe money of Rs. 30 lakh was recovered from angadiya (courier) used by him.
b. Shri Chander Sain Bharti was found using hawala channels for transferring the ill-gotten money.
c. Shri Chander Sain Bharti acquired assets worth Rs 1,63,12,939 (in his and his wife’s name). However their combined income from known sources was Rs 1,16,05,314 and household expenditure was Rs 1,08,09,344. Thus, Shri C. S. Bharti and his wife have amassed disproportionate assets to the tune of Rs 1,55,16,969 which is 133.71% of their known sources of income.
d. Shri Chander Sain Bharti had failed to give prior intimation, to the department, of acquisition/ purchase of immovable properties in his name or in the name of his wife/ family members as required under the CCS (Conduct) Rules, 1964.
Either Colludes with or coerce departmental officers and government counsels / empaneled lawyers in CAT/High Courts to provide /leak department’s confidential internal documents and force them to dilute his departmental/ prosecution cases.
9. Andasu Ravindar (91110)
a. He was apprehended by CBI with an amount of Rs. 50,00,000/- with him.
b. Sh. Andasu Ravindar could not satisfactorily explain the source of that amount.
c. Sh. Andasu Ravindar received loans for himself and or his family members from various persons which were not intimated to the department as discussed in para 11 above.
d. Sh. Andasu Ravindar used his official position to influence financial dealings entered into by the parties related to him in his personal as well as official capacities
e. Sh. Andasu Ravindar acquired assets in his name and in the name of his wife Smt. Andasu Kavitha, to the tune of Rs. 81,01,322/- which are disproportionate to their known sources of income .
f. Sh. Andasu Ravindar abused his official position and obtained pecuniary advantage in the matter pertaining to the survey conducted on M/s A.S. Shipping Agencies Pvt. Ltd.
g. Sh. Andasu Ravindar accepted bribe M/s Aban Offshore Ltd., Chennai with whom he had official dealings.
10. Vivek Batra (92075)
a. Shri Vivek Batra has been accused by CBI in 2005 of abuse of his official position to accumulate assets disproportionate to his known sources of income amounting Rs 1.27 Crore.
b. Shri Vivek Batra has been alleged to be involved in dubious transactions related to accommodation entries of Share Capital and false capital Gains.
c. A reference had been made by the ADG (V) West Zone regarding non submission of requisite details regarding foreign travels by Shri Vivek Batra in spite of issue of letter in this regard. It has been reported that he undertook 10 private foreign visits in the last eight years.
d. Shri Vivek Batra is facing serious allegations of destruction of Government Records to scuttle a vigilance inspection.
e. Shri Vivek Batra is alleged to be behind formation of a Benami Company M/s. Deva Exim Pvt. Ltd. and purchase of 5 shops in Mahavir Rachna, Plot No. 54, Sector 15, CBD, Belapur, New Mumbai.
f. Shri Vivek Batra had made a complaint dated 18th September, 2012 to the Finance Minister against Shri Sanjay Puri, DIT (V)-II working in the Office of the DGIT (V), New Delhi. An inquiry was conducted into the complaint by Shri P. S. Tomar, DIT (V)-I, who examined the witnesses and CCTV footage to ascertain the facts of the matter. Shri P. S. Tomar, DIT (V)-I concluded that the complaint was factually incorrect, false and baseless and apparently filed with a view to discourage/ pressurize Officers working in the Directorate of Vigilance. The matter was placed before the Chairperson, CBDT who gave approval for issue of an administrative warning to Shri Vivek Batra, Addl. CIT cautioning him against making false allegations against any officer of the Department in future.
g. Shri Vivek Batra was facing a criminal case regarding forging the Will of Shri Ashok Malik (Father-in-law of Shri Vivek Batra) in collusion with his wife Ms. Priyanka Batra.
Either Colludes with or coerce departmental officers and government counsels / empaneled lawyers in CAT/High Courts to provide /leak department’s confidential internal documents and force them to dilute his departmental/ prosecution cases.
11. Sh Swetabh Suman CIT (88078)
1. Shri Swetabh Suman was arrested by CBI in New Delhi on April 13, 2018 for allegedly demanding Rs 50 lakh for giving relief in a shell company matter to a businessman. The amount was recovered from a middle-man and searches were carried out by CBI on the premises linked to Shri Swetabh Suman in Guwahati, Jorhat, Shillong, Noida and Delhi. A sum of Rs 40 Lakh (approx) allegedly meant for Shri Swetabh Suman and his accomplices was also recovered from one of the accused and middleman. The matter is under investigation by CBI.
2. Complaints were received against Shri Swetabh Suman relating to acquisition of immovable properties i.e. Bungalow at Dehradun, indulging corruption at a large scale, taking bribes, allowing issue of refunds or completing the scrutiny assessments by taking money from the parties etc. All complaints against Sh. Swetabh Suman received in the Department were forwarded to CBI for investigation. The CBI report on disproportionate assets was processed and sanction for prosecution was issued on 21.05.2010 and RDA for major penalty was initiated by way of issue of a Memorandum dated 08.02.10 under Rule 14 of CCS(CCA) Rules.
3. As per CBI press release dated 14.02.2019 the Court of Special Judge, CBI Cases, Dehradun (Uttarakhand) had sentenced Shri Swetabh Suman to undergo seven years Rigorous Imprisonment with fine of Rs.3.5 crore; his mother Smt. Gulab Devi to undergo one year Rigorous Imprisonment with fine of Rs.10,000/- and two other persons, namely Arun Kumar Singh & Rajinder Vikram Singh, both to undergo four years Rigorous Imprisonment with fine of Rs.20,000/- each in a disproportionate assets case. The Hon’ble Court has also ordered the confiscation of the properties of the accused Swetabh Suman including the house at Dehradun, 01 plot at Noida, the Hotel at Bodh Gaya (Bihar) and a Honda City Car.
4. It has been reported in the press release that the investigation into the matter established that Shri Swetabh Suman abused his official position as a public servant to acquire immovable / movable assets from his ill-gotten money amounting to Rs. 3,13,90,408/- (approx) in his name and in the name of the co-accused persons. The Trial Court found the accused guilty and convicted them.
5. A Vigilance inspection was carried out in respect of the work done by Shri Swetabh Suman Addl. CIT, Range-I, Dehradun. The vigilance inspection had shown irregularities in scrutiny assessments completed by Sh. Swetabh Suman, scrutiny assessments where approval was given by Sh. Swetabh Suman, surveys u/s 133a of the I T act authorized by Sh. Swetabh Suman and approval of refunds.
6. Information was furnished by SP, CBI, Delhi regarding seizure of certain confidential official files of the Office of CCIT, Dehradun during house search of Shri Swetabh Suman at Jamshedpur. It was found later that CCIT, Dehradun had lodged a complaint with the Police on 18.01.2005 regarding theft of these Income Tax files and FIR vide crime No. 18/2005 had been registered u/s 380 and 411 IPC.
12. Ram Kumar Bhargava (145FF)
Shri Ram Kumar Bhargava while holding the charge of TRO-4, Kanpur, initiated recovery proceedings against Ms Vaijanti Gupta. In the process he treated Mr. Jitendra Kumar Shaw as assessee in default being a sundry debtor of Vaijanti Gupta and started recovery proceedings against Mr. Jitendra Shaw. Sh Bhargava is alleged to have issued notice u/s 226(3) of the IT Act without jurisdiction and is alleged to have attached the housing loan account of Shri jitendra Kumar Shaw maintained in the bank.

Forwarded as received
 
The good people of AP paid 2,88,823/- for a minister's dental procedure. Wow !! 2 lacs is overkill for a root canal. But hey, someone else is paying ! That too in Singapore when India has far better institutes.

1569465069453.png
 
A time of reckoning for babus at last

Friday, 20 September 2019 | Devesh Chaturvedi

To change the growing perception that there is a lack of accountability regarding performance and misdeeds of civil servants, the Modi Government has brought in reforms that are expected to foster professionalism and competence, says Devesh Chaturvedi

The civil services have contributed immensely to nation-building since India’s Independence, yet they are criticised for resisting changes, stifling innovation and being oblivious to external realities. There is also a growing perception that there’s a lack of performance accountability and that misdeeds of civil servants often go unpunished. To address these challenges, the Government, in the last five years, has initiated a series of reforms that have impacted almost all sections of the bureaucracy.

Keeping the sanctity of the recruitment process in the civil services is a must to ensure that freshers do not develop a cynical attitude. The Government realised that personality tests or interviews did not add any value to the recruitment process at the lower levels of bureaucracy. Instead, they only created a subjectivity which often led to corruption and nepotism. Hence, it decided to discontinue with the interviews in the recruitments for Group C and Group B non-gazetted posts. Many State Governments also followed suit. The results have been quite encouraging as the candidates have been pleasantly surprised for having been selected on merit without resorting to payment of bribes or using undue influence.

The Fundamental Rule 56-J and All-India Death-Cum- Retirement Benefit rules provide that the Government can prematurely retire any civil servant after giving three months’ notice. However, for years, these provisions for screening of deadwood were not being implemented. These rules are now being implemented and a thorough screening of service records of officials by a committee is helping identify non-performers. This exercise has sent a message that there is a premium attached to both performance and probity.

It was also noticed that the cadre-allotment policies were weakening the all-India character of the services and were detrimental to the spirit of cooperative federalism. The officers were being allotted cadres based on choice. This resulted in officers landing either in their home or adjoining cadre, thus fostering inertia and a hesitation to serve on central deputation in the Government. In fact, the services were slowly being converted into glorified State services.

The Government brought a reformed cadre allotment policy in 2017, based on a roster for five regions in which all the cadres were clubbed, thus ensuring that the all-India character of the services was restored. It also encouraged officers who have served in cadres other that their domicile, to opt for central deputation.

It was also noticed that freshly-recruited IAS officers got important field-level posts like that of District Magistrate, Chief Executive Officer of Zila Parishads and Municipal Corporations for the first 10 to 12 years of their service. However, they often lacked the national perspective while serving at the grassroots and this hampered their effectiveness. To address this issue, since 2015, freshly-recruited IAS officers are being deputed as Assistant Secretaries in the Government of India for three months immediately after their academy training and just before they go back to their respective State cadres for field postings. Experience has shown that this innovation helped young officers imbibe a national perspective that helped them address local issues holistically and with confidence.

Further, the performance of civil servants was measured primarily through the elaborate system of Performance Appraisal Reports (PARs). It was realised that due to the complete disclosure of PARs to the officers assessed, there was widespread grade inflation. Officers were being over-assessed and rated outstanding, notwithstanding their performance. PAR had become a public relations exercise with supervisory officers reluctant to give lower rating for fear of strained relations at the workplace. This had an adverse impact on the empanelment of officers at the Joint Secretary, Additional Secretary and Secretary or equivalent levels. It became difficult to distinguish high performers from others. The Government, therefore, implemented the process of Multi Source Feedback (MSF) or 360 degree appraisal, which is used along with the PARs to assess the suitability of officers for higher positions in the Government. This was also recommended by the Second Administrative Reforms Commission, as well as the Surendranath Committee on Performance Appraisal Reforms.

This intervention created ripples in bureaucratic circles as the feedback about officers was obtained from peers, subordinates and seniors on various personality attributes. The success of this intervention will, however, be judged by the resulting inclusion of errors in the reformed empanelment process, since the exclusion errors can be corrected by subsequent reviews.

There was also a demand for lateral infusion of talent from outside to enrich Government policy processes. The high echelons of policy-making are primarily manned by officers from three sources. The Indian Administrative Services (IAS), other participating All India and Central services and the Central Secretariat Services (CSS). The Government decided to bring in talent from outside through lateral recruitment at the Joint Secretary Level. Ten such positions were thrown open and recruitment were done through the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC). It will be interesting to watch their contributions and amalgamation in the working of the Government. This reform is likely to generate a healthy competition among peers, fostering professionalism, efficiency and competencies in the policy-making process.

While these reforms were aimed at bringing in accountability in performance and conduct, the Government also addressed rising concerns related to the policy paralysis resulting from risk averseness among the civil services. Significantly, the risk awareness was brought on by multiple investigations by anti-corruption agencies in various cases. The amendments in the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 passed in 2018 has provisions that are aimed at protecting honest and well-meaning civil servants. The provision of prior approval for initiating any investigation and deletion of Section 13 (1) d(iii) of the Act were a result of the Government’s resolve to send a message that bonafide commercial decision will be defended and civil servants may go ahead with bold decision making in public interest. These reforms are expected to bring in the desired accountability, professionalism and competencies in the civil services to meet modern day challenges.

(The writer is Principal Secretary, Medical, Health & Family Welfare Department, in Uttar Pradesh Govt.)

A time of reckoning for babus at last
 
  • Like
Reactions: madmax613
KCR dismisses 48,000 employees of Telangana Road Transport Corporation

Telangana chief minister K Chandrasekhar Rao, who held a high-level meeting of officials of the transport department late Sunday evening, announced that the RTC now had only 1,200 employees.

Updated: Oct 06, 2019 22:42 IST
By Srinivasa Rao Apparasu
Hindustan Times, Hyderabad.
1570458772306.png

The employees have been demanding, among other things, merger of RTC with the state government as was done in the neighbouring Andhra Pradesh.(PTI file photo of KCR)

In a sensational move, the Telangana government on Sunday announced dismissal of 48,000-odd employees and workers of Telangana State Road Transport Corporation (TSRTC) from service, after they launched an indefinite strike demanding solution to their long-pending problems.

Telangana chief minister K Chandrasekhar Rao, who held a high-level meeting of officials of the transport department late Sunday evening, announced that the RTC now had only 1,200 employees, including those who did not join the strike and others who returned to their duties before 6 pm on Saturday, a deadline fixed by the government for the unions to call off their strike.

Around 49,340 employees and workers of the RTC have been on strike following a call given by the Joint Action Committee (JAC) of Telangana RTC employees and workers’ unions since the early hours of Saturday.

The employees have been demanding, among other things, merger of RTC with the state government as was done in the neighbouring Andhra Pradesh, where they are being treated as government employees with their retirement being enhanced to 60 years.

They are also demanding revision of their salaries pending since April 2017. They want fresh recruitment in the corporation to reduce the workload on the employees.

According to an official release from the CMO after the high-level meeting, the chief minister said all the employees who had not returned to the duties by Saturday evening were deemed to have lost their jobs.

“There is no question of holding any negotiations with the removed employees and taking them back into the duties. They have committed a major crime by resorting to strike at a time when the RTC was incurring a loss of Rs 1200 crore and facing a debt burden of Rs 5,000 crore, besides suffering from ever-increasing diesel prices. Moreover, striking the work during the festive season is an unpardonable crime,” he said.

The chief minister also categorically ruled out merger of RTC with the state government. “We are not going to succumb to any blackmailing by the employees’ unions. We don’t allow any sort of indiscipline in the institution forever,” he declared.

KCR announced that the government would start the exercise soon to recruit new staff for the RTC and the process would be completed at the earliest. “The new recruits would have to work on probation for certain period and they should give an undertaking that they would not join any employees’ unions,” he said.

Describing it as a new chapter in the history of Telangana RTC, KCR indicated partial privatisation of public transport. He said private bus operators would be brought into the RTC to work as a public-private partnership.

“Hereafter, half of the RTC fleet would be private buses. They would given permits to operate as stage carriers (can stop all at stages, instead of being operated only between two points),” he said.

As an immediate measure, KCR ordered that 2,500 buses be taken on lease and permissions be given to 4,114 private buses to support the public transport. He directed the authorities to restore normalcy within 15 days and expressed confidence that within two to three years, the RTC would be back into profits.

The chief minister also appointed a committee to study the revamping of the RTC in the state and submit a report to the government at the earliest.

KCR dismisses 48,000 employees of Telangana Road Transport Corporation

Holy sh*t. There’s fewer than 2000 employees left. This guy took out 96% of the workforce in one go. I’m betting the unions over at Air India and HAL are sh*tting bricks. Aur karo unionbaazi. He will probably lose an election or two, but this was necessary.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Bali78 and R!cK
How the Modi government is weeding out corrupt bureaucrats

3 min read . Updated: 07 Oct 2019, 11:26 AM IST , by IANS
  • Service rules can be amended or administrative instructions may be issued for removing such tainted officers
  • In June this year, 12 senior IT officers, including one of the rank of joint commissioner, were shown the door
govt_office--621x414_1570427438686.jpg

Employees working in a government office. (Photo: Hindustan Times)

New Delhi: Government employees facing criminal or corruption cases are under a scanner of the Modi administration which is in the process of weeding out bad elements from the bureaucracy as part of efforts to ensure high integrity and standards.

Since June this year, shortly after the Modi government took charge for the second term, at least 64 employees, including commissioner-rank officers, have been compulsorily retired by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) on various charges, including corruption.

More such actions are expected in the future as the central government is reviewing the annual confidential reports and other details of its employees, particularly those facing criminal or corruption cases, officials said.

The Central government has asked all the Cadre Controlling Authorities to establish a mechanism to identify the "dead wood" and compulsorily retire them after thorough examination of their service records.

"The Centre has written to states to prepare a list of officers who are facing charges of misconduct or allegations of corruption," a senior officer said.

The Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, which is the cadre-controlling authority for the IAS officers, is also preparing a list of tainted officers for their removal from service in a phased manner.

A similar exercise is being carried out by the Ministry of Home Affairs and Ministry of External Affairs.

The officer said if need be, the service rules can be amended or administrative instructions may be issued for removing such tainted officers.

"A list has been prepared by most of the ministries and also by the Cadre-Controlling Authorities and names will be announced in a phased manner," said the officer.

For compulsory retirement of officers of IAS, IPS, IFS and other services, Rule 16(3) of the All India Services Rules, 1958, which was amended on January 31, 2012, is applicable.

The officers, compulsorily retired by CBDT since June under Fundamental Rule 56 (J),faced charges of corruption, smuggling and even criminal conspiracy.

The latest was last month, when CBDT compulsorily retired 15 senior officials.

In June this year, 12 senior income tax officers, including one of the rank of joint commissioner, were shown the door.

The government has also directed the federal investigative agencies like Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), National Investigation Agency (NIA) and Enforcement Directorate (ED), and others to identify corrupt officials and dismiss them on urgent note.

Some top NIA officials are under scanner after incidents of corruption raised the eyebrows in the Prime Minister Office (PMO).

Ironically, when the country is fighting war against terrorism, some NIA officers, tasked to investigate such crimes, were busy taking bribes.

In August this year, three NIA officers, including a superintendent of police (SP), were transferred after a Delhi-based business complained that they were pressurising him to pay ₹2 crore in bribes to exempt him from a case involving Mumbai terror attack mastermind Hafiz Saeed.

Officials in Enforcement Directorate (ED), the country's federal financial investigating agency, are also under the radar following complaints of "running an extortion racket".

The government is putting up a "strong mechanism to check accountability" of the central intelligence agencies officials, who have extensively accesses to source money.

Giving a glimpse about the government's intent was Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Independence Day address, in which he said his government is waging a war against corruption.

"Some black sheep in the tax administration may have misused their powers and harassed taxpayers, either by targeting honest assessees or by taking excessive action for minor or procedural violations. We have recently taken the bold step of compulsorily retiring a significant number of tax officials, and we will not tolerate this type of behaviour," he had said.

The government action against tax officials assumes significance as there have been complaints, including from the corporates, tax officials are harassing business people and this is one of the reasons for the economic slowdown.

This story has been published from a wire agency feed without modifications to the text. Only the headline has been changed.

How the Modi government is weeding out corrupt bureaucrats
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bali78 and 5H1KT0