Indian Army chief wants to revolutionise the military — by cutting manpower

Indian Army plans to cut 1.5 lakh troops in five years
Updated: Sep 09, 2018 | 2:56 IST | By - Srinjoy Chowdhury

The restructuring efforts, to begin next month, could lead to cuts of 50,000 troops in the next two years and over another lakh over the next five years.
1536441991-INDIAN_ARMY_PTI.jpg


New Delhi: In a major move to restructure the Indian Army, General Bipin Rawat has asked for studies to prepare the force for 21st-century conflict. General Rawat wants a leaner, meaner and more technology driven army with fewer troops, envisaging a cut of 150,000-200,000 troops from the current 1.2 million plus force.
The restructuring efforts, to begin next month, could lead to cuts of 50,000 troops in the next two years and over another lakh over the next five years. This is the first time that the Army has considered a cut-- the last time being in 1998, before the Kargil war when General VP Malik, then chief, had looked at a cut of 50,000 troops. Some of the cuts will be from infantry but with India rapidly modernizing and technology at disposal there are sections of the force that are less relevant today.

General Rawat wants to start from Army HQ itself. The Directorate General of Military Training, he feels, can be pared down drastically with much of the work being handed over to Shimla's Training Command. Some parts of DGMT will go to the Combat engineers’ directorate, but much of the rest could go to Shimla.

The Information Warfare section in Military Operations and Public Information section might be merged. A merger of the Weapons and Equipment Directorate and the Policy Planning Directorate is also on the cards. More changes are likely in the logistics sections of the army, considered bloated even earlier.

In the formations, the Engineering Signal regiment and the Operating Signal Regiment could be merged. The Corps of Signals could lose 8,000 posts. In the Military transport department, the "third line" of vehicles that is to be used during conflict may not be used anymore. Civilian transport could well be used.

One far-reaching change could be the discarding of tank transporters. Currently, there are steel transportation trucks that carry 40 tonnes of steel. The army is already in discussions with the union transport ministry to make new steel transports to be capable of carrying 50 tonnes. They should be widened by about a foot to carry the tank with more ease. The new steel trucks will have chips to ensure that they can be brought in easily when they are required.

Major changes are also being considered for senior officers. Currently, infantry officers get to command battalions at the age of 36-37. Officers will now have to wait till they are about 40, as was the case earlier. The army feels the COs should be a little more experienced. But senior officers will be getting to command brigades, divisions and corps when they are younger. An officer can be appointed a brigadier (if the post is not abolished) at 45, a major-general at 50 and a lieutenant general at 55.
Part of the restructuring would also mean fewer promotions to higher offices in the coming years. Instead of 14 officers moving from major general to lieutenant general, there will be only ten and subsequently, eight.

All this, the army feels, given new technologies, could it firmly into the mid-21st century as a fighting force

Indian Army plans to cut 1.5 lakh troops in five years
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ashwin
Army chief to talk to top generals today, on restructuring the force

Army chief, General Bipin Rawat, will talk to his top generals – the seven army commanders, and his principal staff officers – on Tuesday here, seeking to bring them on board as he embarks on the most far-reaching personnel and organisational reforms the army has attempted since independence.

The defence ministry has already initiated a reduction of 57,000 personnel, including 30,000 civilian employees, in line with recommendations of the Shekatkar Committee. Now Rawat is courageously targeting the reduction of another 50,000 uniformed soldiers.

These include not just logistics and services personnel, but even manpower from infantry battalions – the basic fighting unit of the army and widely considered untouchable.

Confirming the process to Business Standard, Rawat stated: “The army has become 1.25 million strong and is continuing to expand. We spend 83 per cent of our budget on revenue expenditure, mainly salaries and pensions, which leaves just 17 per cent for modernisation. We have to cut down on manpower to make more for equipment.”

While Rawat is firmly in the saddle – he has been chief for over a year and a half and has as long to go, a tenure longer than any recent army chief – his proposed reforms cut so deeply into existing hierarchies and interest groups that buy-in from senior generals is essential. Without that, the proposals could be mired in endless discussions and counter proposals.

No formal proposals have yet been laid on the table. But the army is abuzz with speculation, because the “convening orders” of the three committees that will recommend reduction and reform measures, have been made public. Each committee is headed by a senior lieutenant general and deals with a separate area.

One committee, headed by the army’s “financial planning” chief, Lieutenant General Ajai Singh, will present proposals to cut down the size of army headquarters (AHQ). Rawat is known to believe that, over the years, AHQ has become bloated with non-essential appointments and departments.

Sources close to the chief say he has suggested to Singh to examine the feasibility of merging AHQ’s Military Training Directorate with the Simla-based Army Training Command (ARTRAC). Both organisations perform overlapping functions and there is believed to be scope for significant manpower reductions.

Similarly, just as the Directorate General of Assam Rifles is based in Shillong, in the northeast where its battalions operate, Singh will consider whether the Directorate General of Rashtriya Rifles should be moved from its present location in New Delhi to Udhampur or Srinagar, where all Rashtriya Rifle battalions operate.

A second committee, headed by the army’s “perspective planning” chief, Lieutenant General Rajeshwar, will examine measures to eliminate unnecessary officer appointments, especially those that arose from the Ajai Vikram Singh Committee. In addition, Rawat has asked Rajeshwar to consider whether the large number of brigade, division and corps HQ can be pruned, saving on manpower needed to staff each HQ.

Instead of the current organisation, where three infantry battalions come under a brigade HQ, three brigades come under a division HQ and two divisions come under a corps HQ, the committee would examine if it is possible to eliminate the division HQ? Instead, four-five battalions could be grouped under each brigade HQ, and the resulting four-five brigades come directly under a corps HQ.

The third committee, headed by the Military Secretary, Lieutenant General JS Sandhu, will work on proposals to slash the authorization of officers, which currently amounts to almost 50,000. There is invariably a shortfall of 7,000-8,000 officers, and the belief in several quarters is that this is an artificial scarcity. This committee will examine whether the shortfall can be eliminated partly by reducing the officer authorization and partly by promoting more deserving soldiers to officer rank.

In Parliament in December 2017, the defence ministry stated that the strength of the army was 12.15 lakhs and that 49,932 officers were authorized. In addition, tens of thousands of civilian employees are paid from the army budget.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Star Wars
I had earlier written about my opposition to removing the rank of Brigadier. I have one more reason now to add to my views. In NDA, Pune, a first time relegated cadet is called A Brigadier, twice relegated is called A General and thrice relegated gets thrown out of the academy and is called A Field Marshall as a Field Marshall is for life time. now is you remove the rank of Brigadier what are we going to call a first time relegated cadet.
Has anyone been been thrown out of Academy in recent decades (except for injury during training) ?
On what grounds: disciplinary, or performance or academics, or physical, sports, psychological etc.) ?
 
Has anyone been been thrown out of Academy in recent decades (except for injury during training) ?
On what grounds: disciplinary, or performance or academics, or physical, sports, psychological etc.) ?
I am not aware of the recent times. But relegation due to Performance and Academics were very frequent.
 
I am not aware of the recent times. But relegation due to Performance and Academics were very frequent.
Many of my friends who joined Academy were quite disappointed that Academics is valued even in Academy. However, they lugged along. Then, even after getting commissioned in Infantry, they had to complete courses which sagged their spirits further. They continue to complain about it & say: had they knew about this importance attached to studies in Forces, they would rather have prepared for engineering/management etc.:)