Analysis Judge Loya case and how SC directly reprimanded the Congress

Bharath

Technical Staff
Dec 1, 2017
791
1,000
Boston
The case: that judge Loya who presided over Amit Shah's alleged killing of Sohrabuddin Sheik (when Amit Shah was Guj Home Minister) passed away of natural causes but the Congress (Tehseen Poonawala) allege that Judge Loya dies under "mysterious circumstances". The subsequent Judge then acquitted Amit Shah of the murder of Sohrabuddin. Congress' Poonawala put a PIL in the SC to go over the accusation that AMit Shah somehow was complicit in murder of Judge Loya to get a favorable Judge.

“We have come to the conclusion that there is absolutely no merit in the writ petitions. There is no reason for the court to doubt the clear and consistent statements of the four judicial officers. The documentary material on the record indicates that the death of judge Loya was due to natural causes. There is no ground for the court to hold that there was a reasonable suspicion about the cause or circumstances of death which would merit a further inquiry.”

“Repeatedly, counsel for the petitioners and intervenors have attempted to inform the court that they have no personal agenda and that they have instituted these proceedings to protect judicial independence. An aura of good faith has been sought to be created by submitting that the true purpose of seeking an inquiry into the circumstances relating to the death of judge Loya is to protect the district judiciary. But as the submissions have evolved, it has become clear that the petition is a veiled attempt to launch a frontal attack on the independence of the judiciary and to dilute the credibility of judicial institutions. Judicial review is a potent weapon to preserve the rule of law. However, here, we have been confronted with a spate of scurrilous allegations. Absent any tittle of proof that they are conspirators in a murder, the court must stand by the statements of the judicial officers. The judges of the district judiciary are vulnerable to wanton attacks on their independence. This court would be failing in its duty if it were not to stand by them”.

In clear terms, the SC has chided the Congress party (the petitioner was tehseen poonawala) to keep their political tussles out of Judiciary and not to use frivolous cases to settle political scores.

@Aashish @Ashwin @Levina @vstol Jockey @Paro @Parthu @Parul @RATHORE @Sathya

Breaking: SC Dismisses Petitions Seeking Probe Into The Death Of Judge Loya [Read Judgment] | Live Law
 
Last edited:
The case: that judge Loya who presided over Amit Shah's alleged killing of Sohrabuddin Sheik (when Amit Shah was Guj Home Minister) passed away of natural causes but the Congress (Tehseen Poonawala) allege that Judge Loya dies under "mysterious circumstances". The subsequent Judge then acquitted Amit Shah of the murder of Sohrabuddin. Congress' Poonawala put a PIL in the SC to go over the accusation that AMit Shah somehow was complicit in murder of Judge Loya to get a favorable Judge.

“We have come to the conclusion that there is absolutely no merit in the writ petitions. There is no reason for the court to doubt the clear and consistent statements of the four judicial officers. The documentary material on the record indicates that the death of judge Loya was due to natural causes. There is no ground for the court to hold that there was a reasonable suspicion about the cause or circumstances of death which would merit a further inquiry.”

“Repeatedly, counsel for the petitioners and intervenors have attempted to inform the court that they have no personal agenda and that they have instituted these proceedings to protect judicial independence. An aura of good faith has been sought to be created by submitting that the true purpose of seeking an inquiry into the circumstances relating to the death of judge Loya is to protect the district judiciary. But as the submissions have evolved, it has become clear that the petition is a veiled attempt to launch a frontal attack on the independence of the judiciary and to dilute the credibility of judicial institutions. Judicial review is a potent weapon to preserve the rule of law. However, here, we have been confronted with a spate of scurrilous allegations. Absent any tittle of proof that they are conspirators in a murder, the court must stand by the statements of the judicial officers. The judges of the district judiciary are vulnerable to wanton attacks on their independence. This court would be failing in its duty if it were not to stand by them”.

In clear terms, the SC has chided the Congress party (the petitioner was tehseen poonawala) to keep their political tussles out of Judiciary and not to use frivolous cases to settle political scores.

@Aashish @Ashwin @Levina @vstol Jockey @Paro @Parthu @Parul @RATHORE @Sathya

Breaking: SC Dismisses Petitions Seeking Probe Into The Death Of Judge Loya [Read Judgment] | Live Law

This is why there is a renewed attempt to get CJI impeached. Judiciary is the only place where common man find some solace that their interests would be preserved. But sadly these jokers are now trying to destroy that as well.

Judge Loya verdict: Opposition renews bid for impeachment of CJI Dipak Misra, to meet Venkaiah Naidu today
 
This is the same political party which protected one of the corrupt judges of 90s V Ramaswami. He was literally caught red handed while taking bribe, but was protected by INC.

No doubt this will be seen as one of the worst period of opposition. They want to gain some political mileage out of this move, hope Dipak kaka gets even more harder on these scumbags, especially Prashant Bhushan, this guy has crossed all the limits in recent times. He should be charged with contempt of court ASAP.
 
This is why there is a renewed attempt to get CJI impeached. Judiciary is the only place where common man find some solace that their interests would be preserved. But sadly these jokers are now trying to destroy that as well.

Judge Loya verdict: Opposition renews bid for impeachment of CJI Dipak Misra, to meet Venkaiah Naidu today
This a Congress strategy after SC refused to defer Judgement of Ayodhya post 2019 elections as Kapil Sibal wanted. They fear Judgement before 2019 favorable or Unfavorable verdict will only propel BJP to absolute,total majority once again.

So to stall that case , they are going for impeachment after "Hindu Terror" was rubbished by HC ,Col.Purohit fixed by UPA came in open, Justice Loya case got slammed in their faces.

As long as the impeachment process goes on which might take some months the CJI Dipak Mishra cannot attend any cases or deliver Verdicts as he is being investigated, so that will stall the Ayodhya verdict.

Congress is also indirectly threatening other judges to toe their line or face similar consequences
 
As long as the impeachment process goes on which might take some months the CJI Dipak Mishra cannot attend any cases or deliver Verdicts as he is being investigated, so that will stall the Ayodhya verdict.

for impeachment process to even begin, there needs a majority ruling and VP (Rajya Sabha chair) needs to agree to it - both unlikely.
 
for impeachment process to even begin, there needs a majority ruling and VP (Rajya Sabha chair) needs to agree to it - both unlikely.
They want to muddy it, after they got Punkslapped by Courts!Why do you think there was a sustained Propaganda to make, Indian Army, CBI,NIA or now Judiciary as culprits?
It is about eroding the trust! Be Prepared for what comes next, they will Label Indian Army as aggressor.
 
During the tenure of UPA they were worried about the Indian army taking over. remember?

They want to muddy it, after they got Punkslapped by Courts!Why do you think there was a sustained Propaganda to make, Indian Army, CBI,NIA or now Judiciary as culprits?
It is about eroding the trust! Be Prepared for what comes next, they will Label Indian Army as aggressor.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Aravind