LCA Tejas Mk1 & Mk1A - News and discussions

It's good to see LCA turning into a canard design.
One of my very first designs of LSA was about reversinmg the wing tail of Mig-21. I moved the intakes below thw chin and moved the wings aft while the same tail plane was positioned 1.1 times the wing MAC ahead of the wing. This is also called the X/Cmac distance, The tail plane was placed in CCC and 0.2 Z/Cmac above the wing. The results were stunning.
 
One of my very first designs of LSA was about reversinmg the wing tail of Mig-21. I moved the intakes below thw chin and moved the wings aft while the same tail plane was positioned 1.1 times the wing MAC ahead of the wing. This is also called the X/Cmac distance, The tail plane was placed in CCC and 0.2 Z/Cmac above the wing. The results were stunning.

What do you think about the design lcafanboy posted?

lca_canards_zpsl3jy7a1u-jpg.3259
 
What do you think about the design lcafanboy posted?

lca_canards_zpsl3jy7a1u-jpg.3259
This design is a huge compromise to somehow improve the performance of the aircraft. The CCC configuration of this design does not comply with the X, Y & Z axis separation criteria for CCC. So while it will surely improve performance of the design but will fall well short of its true potential.
If you see closely, the wings have been pushed backwards and so the intakes which were below the wings now appear to be ahead of them. This needed to be done as the canards will move the overall neutral point forward and to keep aircraft neutral point in the right place, you will need to move wings back.
 
Last edited:
Hi

When you say compromise, what gets affected? And how does a compromise result in improving the performance?

Sorry for the noob question.
It is a compromise in the sense that it will not be able to fully utilise the advantages of a CCC design like Rafale but it will be somewhat close to Gripen and better than LCA Mk1 design.
 
  • Like
Reactions: suryakiran