Not really. I don't believe corruption was involved, but I do believe the final selection came down to costs, and I had already pointed out before that if upfront costs were considered then the F-35 would win this easily. So I don't believe this was a political choice as well. The same with the Patriot, it's obviously cheaper than European solutions.
The F-35 made the shortlist, and it won based on its future upfront costs vs the more expensive Eurocanards with their more expensive euros directly giving the Americans a near 20%+ price advantage by default. Had they considered the F-35 based on its existing capability and costs, or even LCC, things would have been different.
And then they equated simulator experience with real flying experience, which is just the wrong way to go about it. Especially given by their own admission that the F-35 will fly 50% less sorties during training compared to older jets. So the Americans gave themselves a 25% cost advantage in terms of sustainment costs right there. Combine that with the 20% exchange rate difference, that's too much of a price advantage. None of this proves the F-35 is cheaper. It's just messing around with flight hours and a weaker dollar.
Then there's still the question of whether the French entered the race with the F3R or F4.1 or F4.2, because it's 4.2 that's coming with all the next gen goodies. 4.1 is just a software upgrade with core systems left largely untouched, maybe some upgrades.
@Picdelamirand-oil claims the F4.2 will be ready in the 2024-25 period, but I don't think it's that simple since the French themselves will induct it in 2027. Until then, the F4.2 is a theoretical pie in the sky and wouldn't have been available for operational testing in the same timeframe as the Swiss evaluations, which called for jets that are operational. If it's the F3R/F4.1, then I have no qualms in claiming it's inferior to the F-35.
Finally, we need to actually see where the F-35 got its additional tech points. In terms of sensor range, both RBE-2AA and DDM-NG, the F-35 will surpass the Rafale, especially so with TR3 with its computer upgrade. The cockpit of the F-35 is obviously superior to the current Rafale's, especially the HMDS, should be the case even with F4.1 since they say no significant changes are expected there. The F-35's internal fuel load is superior thereby giving it more range. Its other relevant performances like climb and STR should be more or less the same. Most of the supersonic capabilities where other aircraft excel in is needed for major air forces, so its largely irrelevant to Switzerland, I've touched upon this already. The Swiss should be fine with a minute or two long dash speed and the F-35 should comfortably manage that up to mach 1.6. The simulator would have been given a retarded amount of points simply because they have decided it can eliminate 25% of a jet's flight hours. Worst case, the Swiss tested the F3R. 'Cause the F4.1 flew for the first time only last month, not in time for the Swiss evaluations.
Anyway, a lot more capabilities will be important for Finland. But they will need to consider the paper capabilities of the F4.2.
From India's perspective, we need to see how far apart the Rafale F4.2 and F-35 are. Hopefully Finland will answer that.