It does not matter what the SC does.
On the ground the beef ban stays. And no one has the guts to do anything about it. Because no one has the confidence of the protetion of the dispensation. Mr S of Burger King is still not making King Beef and Beef burgers, nor the steak burgers (though the chicken steak with the same sauces is pretty close - though not as chewy) because he refuses to pay protection money to the local Hindu right wing goons who are camped in his eatery.
So same thing.
You are wanting to see examples of the government actually practicing bigotry by commission.
I'm telling you that the bigotry of "plausible deniability" omission hurts as bad. Even worse.
The sangh parivar are the BJP's "non state actors" ...
Its Gandhi ke teen bandar ... while the hounds go to town.
Cheers, Doc
I cannot support thuggery. Hope they face the law soon.
My point was never that they are clean. My point was that it was minor- childish- its an adjustment everybody has made- for various other sentiments- all the time- where we figuratively make do with the chicken steak with sauce- an adjustment you should make for your sentimental fellows.
You know, one could interpret the ban on entering fire temples as discrimination based on religion. I could claim to be a Zoroastrian and you nor anybody has the right to tell me otherwise.(Article 25 of our constitution. But, I make the adjustment.
. India is going to be India either way. A different govt doesnt guarantee your burgers returning. Maybe you can fix one up yourself or go to a different one. Fact is , Its completely legal.