Right Now we have ONLY 5 RAFALES
They are trying to create an anti-Indian narrative as usual.
Right Now we have ONLY 5 RAFALES
What is the advantages of holographic head up display over the conventional HUD we seeing on su30. Definitely Holographic display looks cool, any other advantages other than weight?
HUD maximize the field of view (FOV) of the projected image, to maintain a comfortable area in a 2-D or 3-D display viewer within which the eye can move and still see the entire image, and to minimize the size of the projector.What is the advantages of holographic head up display over the conventional HUD we seeing on su30. Definitely Holographic display looks cool, any other advantages other than weight?
This is likeWe have tried to do this and it is your laws that make it impossible, unless DRDO is willing to pay its share according to your laws.
Normally something that is strategic and very crucial, we don't hesitate to put 500 million to obtain it, especially since Safran was ready to put in as much. You've been trying to get this technology for decades and when it's possible you can't decide. France, to get to the level it has reached, has had to do research for 30 years and spend several billions on this subject. You have no notion of the cost of the technologies you want to buy, which is why you never manage to come to a conclusion.
Probably not (exactly the same envoeloppe). Safer bet to estimate a 30% increase in range. Also new GaN antenna and matrix IR imager@A Person @Bon Plan @Picdelamirand-oil @halloweene
Egypte : MBDA monte à bord des frégates allemandes MEKO avec le VL-Mica NG
MBDA a réussi à faire monter le missile surface-air VL Mica NG à bord des Meko allemandes achetées par l’Égypte. Une commande qui ouvre de nouvelles perspectives pour le Rafale.www.latribune.fr
It's all beyind a paywall. Any hints that the VL-MICA NG has twice the range of the VL-MICA in it, if one of you has a subscription?
You don't understand the situation: our commitment was to accept technology transfer in this field, not free technology transfer.This is like
1. Promise first to get deal
2. Twist arm after getting money to get more money and even then not fulfilling your commitments.
Sir you can make thousands of excuse for not fulfilling your commitments, but at you will lose billions of $ of business.
Because of your incompetence your permanent customer is moving towards britain and it's fighter programme. May India will be manufacturing hub for Britain 6th generation fighter and may induct it.
Yeah, @vstol Jockey is right about DA. You guys back stabbed India in this crucial time.You don't understand the situation: our commitment was to accept technology transfer in this field, not free technology transfer.
After defining what to transfer and how to do it, SAFRAN proposed an approach to DRDO. In this approach SAFRAN agreed to invest as much as possible in accordance with Indian laws in order to free itself from part of its offset obligations. But it was not entitled under Indian law to invest 100%.
What was missing should have been invested by DRDO, but DRDO found it too expensive.
And I'm not worried about RR's competition, firstly because I'm out of business, and secondly because there's nothing strategic for France to sell hundreds of Rafales, we just need to keep the assembly line open long enough.
Selling hundreds of Rafale could be a strategic objective for Dassault to make a profit but for my point of view I find that Dassault is rich enough and therefore I am indifferent about this point.
But I would be particularly satisfied if India bought hundreds of Rafales because I think you need them, taking into account your neighbours.
What should we have done?Yeah, @vstol Jockey is right about DA. You guys back stabbed India in this crucial time.
Thats easy,What should we have done?
Also see his DCS videos also on Growing Sidewinder channel. Just awesome
The interview starts from 17:32
You're talking about old stories that I've already explained. Hydra talks about "this crucial time"...Thats easy,
Both of this derailed MMRCA.
- Should have given actual life cycle cost as EADS did.
- Shouldnt have given inflated cost (Going back from the RFP) after winning L1.
Everybody had lied about their life cycle costs. They played like how other players played. It's fault of our procurement policies rather than anything else. We need to buy atleast 54 more to get any real tech transfer from DA. 36 are a pittance.Thats easy,
Both of this derailed MMRCA.
- Should have given actual life cycle cost as EADS did.
- Shouldnt have given inflated cost (Going back from the RFP) after winning L1.
Funnily enough Boeing actually might win the mmrca 2 because they have tied up with HAL and mahindra. Dassault has yet to select a local partner. So f18 and f15 have a pretty decent chance...I personally feel, Anil Ambani association is what hurt Indian Rafale chances.
If it's TATA / other cos Who are involved in Tejas manufacturing..
We would be rooting for making in India.
Everybody had lied about their life cycle costs. They played like how other players played. It's fault of our procurement policies rather than anything else. We need to buy atleast 54 more to get any real tech transfer from DA. 36 are a pittance.
Funnily enough Boeing actually might win the mmrca 2 because they have tied up with HAL and mahindra. Dassault has yet to select a local partner. So f18 and f15 have a pretty decent chance...
No they didn't. That's a myth. Only DA did not produce documents. They should have disqualified at this stage but because of obvious IAF preferences they didn't.Everybody had lied about their life cycle costs. They played like how other players played.