What do you have to say about the combination of automatic terrain following at very low altitude and high speed, with AASMs that allow you to fire from a distance? Functions that are available to Indians.In the future, over-the-horizon strikes in mid-air will be the main means of attack for the Air Force
This approach sounds novel, but it's not the future. First of all, you talk about automatic terrain scanning function, Taiwan also often advertise their F16V has this function, but it is only a kind of auxiliary driving capability, followed by AASM missile, this is a rocket boost bomb, but its launch at ultra-low altitude must not get his due range, still let the enemy's large number of short-range air defense weapons shot downWhat do you have to say about the combination of automatic terrain following at very low altitude and high speed, with AASMs that allow you to fire from a distance? Functions that are available to Indians.
I'm not talking about the automatic terrain-scanning function, but automatic terrain-following at low altitude (100 feet) and high speed (600 knots). What's more, the AASM can be launched after a pop-up, like the Mig 29 in Ukraine, if you want to extend the range to 60 km.This approach sounds novel, but it's not the future. First of all, you talk about automatic terrain scanning function, Taiwan also often advertise their F16V has this function, but it is only a kind of auxiliary driving capability, followed by AASM missile, this is a rocket boost bomb, but its launch at ultra-low altitude must not get his due range, still let the enemy's large number of short-range air defense weapons shot down
In fercity I'm not sure.The Russo-Ukrainian war was different from any previous war in its ferocity and the large-scale use of new technologies, which represented the beginning of a new era. I'm here to discuss the implications for PLA, and PLAAF in particular
15 kilometers, left or right of the jet trajectory.followed by AASM missile, this is a rocket boost bomb, but its launch at ultra-low altitude must not get his due range
What you are talking about is ultimately an auxiliary driving function. There are two main reasons why ultra-low altitude flight will be eliminated in the future. Firstly, with the improvement of radar performance in fighter jets and early warning aircraft, it is difficult to hide targets using ground clutter. Secondly, with the popularization of CEC capability, future air defense missiles can achieve the ability to intercept ultra-low altitude targets from a distance through the relay signal of early warning aircraft. However, the Rafale fighter has not solved these two threats.I'm not talking about the automatic terrain-scanning function, but automatic terrain-following at low altitude (100 feet) and high speed (600 knots). What's more, the AASM can be launched after a pop-up, like the Mig 29 in Ukraine, if you want to extend the range to 60 km.
What is the difference between the attack of AASM and Russian aircraft launched rockets? AASM has higher accuracy, with two guidance modes of IR and GPS, and may add data links in the future. But what are the improvements in the survivability of this aircraft, and I never believed that a bomb equipped only with rocket boosters and no gliding ability could fly 60 kilometers at ultra-low altitudes,Even if it's like the MiG-29, providing initial energy to gusts of wind through climbingI'm not talking about the automatic terrain-scanning function, but automatic terrain-following at low altitude (100 feet) and high speed (600 knots). What's more, the AASM can be launched after a pop-up, like the Mig 29 in Ukraine, if you want to extend the range to 60 km.
This war is like the Spanish Civil War, although both sides have made many foolish actions, it still heralds the arrival of a new eraIn fercity I'm not sure.
Nothing in common with Barbarossa (and the Shoah) or ww2 Pacific campaign.
New technologies? Mainly the massive use of drones, and a confirmation of how usefull is Himars like systems, and rapid fire and long range artillery.
Early warning aircraft will not detect Rafale at long range because Rafale is LO and use actve cancellation in addition to ground clutter so these plane will be shot down by long range air to air missile fire by Rafale before they detect it. So future ground-to-air missiles will be blinded by the earth's rotundity.What you are talking about is ultimately an auxiliary driving function. There are two main reasons why ultra-low altitude flight will be eliminated in the future. Firstly, with the improvement of radar performance in fighter jets and early warning aircraft, it is difficult to hide targets using ground clutter. Secondly, with the popularization of CEC capability, future air defense missiles can achieve the ability to intercept ultra-low altitude targets from a distance through the relay signal of early warning aircraft. However, the Rafale fighter has not solved these two threats.
I don't care if you don't believe it, it's official information from the manufacturer, it only depends on the energy of the booster which is transformed into potential energy and allows the AASM to glide to its target as if it were being launched from high altitude, because the AASM, which is almost supersonic, glides at these speeds with its stumps, even if it's not as good as with a deployable wing kit.and I never believed that a bomb equipped only with rocket boosters and no gliding ability could fly 60 kilometers at ultra-low altitudes,Even if it's like the MiG-29, providing initial energy to gusts of wind through climbing