It seems that Levcon are removed.Looks more like stingray fish than bird to me ...
Is there any levcon Delta tail fighter before ?
It seems that Levcon are removed.Looks more like stingray fish than bird to me ...
Is there any levcon Delta tail fighter before ?
Looks more like stingray fish than bird to me ...
Is there any levcon Delta tail fighter before ?
Pak-Fa aka SU-57 has levcons and tail plane.
Pak-Fa aka SU-57 has levcons and tail plane.
Trapezoidal is a form of Delta. Even the LCA wing has a sweep forward of 4* at the trailing edge. It is not a pure delta.But I think that's a trapezoidal wing design, not a delta.
So the entire project ends in failure. What were the last mile glitches that were to be sorted out by Safran all about? Last heard they have certified the Kaveri to be good enough to undergo limited envelope flight testing. What's all this now? @randomradio ; @Picdelamirand-oilNot even in mk2. So it would be miracle if we still manage to make it marine worthy.
As of now this engine is fit for flight trials and certification but we dont have a platform where it can be used either as single engine or twin engine. This engine needs to shed weight a become less than 1000 kgs from nearly 1060 kgs that it weighs now.So the entire project ends in failure. What were the last mile glitches that were to be sorted out by Safran all about? Last heard they have certified the Kaveri to be good enough to undergo limited envelope flight testing. What's all this now? @randomradio ; @Picdelamirand-oil
Can you gentlemen shed some light on this?
but we dont have a platform where it can be used either as single engine or twin engine.
Ideally a new engine must be tested on a flying test bed like the Gramov IL-76 or on a twin engine jet. I am not aware of any Mig-29 being made available to GTRE to fly test this engine so we are going to use an LCA for it.Sir, is that the only reason why it won't be powering the MCA or the AMCA?
Is this such an insurmountable problem ? Can't we source test beds to test its efficacy? There were articles earlier on how we could do so by procuring a MiG-29 from Russia. What happened to that concept?
If we are going to use the LCA for it, assuming it proves adequate for the job, can't it power the MCA then? Or will we require better iterations of it, another round of testings to go with it and the same old problem of not mating a new engine with a new plane?Ideally a new engine must be tested on a flying test bed like the Gramov IL-76 or on a twin engine jet. I am not aware of any Mig-29 being made available to GTRE to fly test this engine so we are going to use an LCA for it.
i think just because Doval does not want others to know what a failure it is is the only reason this program is making headlines in defense shows otherwise we are very much ready to dump it and move forward with completely different optionsIf we are going to use the LCA for it, assuming it proves adequate for the job, can't it power the MCA then? Or will we require better iterations of it, another round of testings to go with it and the same old problem of not mating a new engine with a new plane?
What's the future of the Kaveri program then? What about all that talk of designing K 10, K 11, etc? What happens to them? Will they be using better iterations of the M88 core? What happens to the Kabini core then? How will using the M88 core to power the K9 help us in gaining technological know-how of designing optimal cores? What about IPR, ToT, etc for such cores as SAFRAN supplies? Will GTRE be co owners of the IPR in case better iterations of the M88 go into the K10, K11 etc?
In earnest anticipation of a response.
So the entire project ends in failure. What were the last mile glitches that were to be sorted out by Safran all about? Last heard they have certified the Kaveri to be good enough to undergo limited envelope flight testing. What's all this now? @randomradio ; @Picdelamirand-oil
Can you gentlemen shed some light on this?
so it can run on any test bed without failure for more than 2 hours?The engine is fine. But it does not deliver enough power for all of our manned aircraft, only UAVs and UCAVs for now.
If we are going to use the LCA for it, assuming it proves adequate for the job, can't it power the MCA then? Or will we require better iterations of it, another round of testings to go with it and the same old problem of not mating a new engine with a new plane?
What's the future of the Kaveri program then? What about all that talk of designing K 10, K 11, etc? What happens to them? Will they be using better iterations of the M88 core? What happens to the Kabini core then? How will using the M88 core to power the K9 help us in gaining technological know-how of designing optimal cores? What about IPR, ToT, etc for such cores as SAFRAN supplies? Will GTRE be co owners of the IPR in case better iterations of the M88 go into the K10, K11 etc?
In earnest anticipation of a response.
so it can run on any test bed without failure for more than 2 hours?
If you recall I pointed out that the French will likely only give us outdated tech in order to make K10 suitable for operation within its design envelop.