Texts adopted - Situation of the Uyghur in China (China-cables) - Thursday, 19 December 2019
This is European resolution on Uyghurs in China. It has already been adopted. China didn't bat an eye. Why should India care?
For starters India is not China, China is chastised for Human Rights abuse on almost every forum and every other day and on merit. The basis of this resolution is CAA, its barely a 2 page act and the content is only of 5-6 lines rest is just syntax, it doesnt even mention word Muslim in whole act yet you are reduced to some kind of extremist bigot successfully by whole world. Blaming Jihadis is like blaming snakes for having fangs, they are supposed to do this, its your duty to not let them successful but you failed so badly that it will be lesson for coming generation how to not fk up a positive bill.
For any one who is having any doubts about how REAL diplomacy works should see how diplomacy worked in UNSC during 1947. Pakistan, having attacked Kashmir, with whom they had signed a stand still agreement, was not even chastised in UNSC resolution. Heck, they were not even forced to stop the war for about an year. Not just that it took 4 months before they could even get a resolution in place. And this was UNSC. And then, the original resolution 47 which recognized Pakistan as aggressor was changed in 1950 to treat position of India and Pakistan as same. India had to see a number of resolution one after another, each weakening its position in UNSC while facing attacks from Pakistan. It was only in 1971 when USSR intervened and counselled Indian diplomats to stop giving any shit to these resolutions did they stop. And it is a well known fact that post 1971 no new resolution was taken. Previously the general understanding in UNSC was (as put by one analyst) : " if India was slapped on both the cheeks, India felt bad
it did not have a third cheek to show.".
And did I mention that this was UNSC with 1000 times more teeth than EU Parliament?
Thats lot of content on "HOW DIPLOMACY WORKS" without a thing about context. In 1947, infact even 2 decades later India fed its population based on charity of others, beggars are not choosers, there is a thing called diplomatic clout/muscle, you may wanna read about it a bit before throwing random out of context phrases.
Anyway fast forward to 2019, India violates sovereignty of a lunatic Nuclear Power, no body bats an eye, few months later India scraps article 370, nobody say a thing, you see how its different from 1947? Now suddenly after CAA, non issue driven fully on misinformation, everyone is lecturing us and the government that is supposed to clear the misunderstanding, nipping this in bud was infact the leader of misinformation campaign because it was politically attractive.
Now in defense of that you are telling me that its okay, we were humiliated in 1947 too so its natural they will humiliate us again, we should ignore it, so are we back to our status of 1947 just in 2-3 months? You are conveniently hiding that just 6 months back whole world was backing us, respecting our position and concern even on our aggressive stance. By playing victim of 'evil west' you are brushing under the carpet the gross incompetence of Govt. of India and its leaders who are responsible for this.
Go back to past few months, see what changed during this time, there is a series of fk ups from government and than doubling down on all of them to show that they cannot be wrong. You make more enemies every day, even allies that were supporting you through thick and thin, now when they are turning on you, paying back in kind and you are crying victim.
Texts adopted - Situation of the Uyghur in China (China-cables) - Thursday, 19 December 2019
Diplomacy is not done with EU. It is done with real nations. EU is just a worthless organization. Lets see how many nations will actually care for some random EU resolution.
And you were teaching us about what "REAL DIPLOMACY" is.
Indians like @BlackOpsIndia should read some history before getting all too hoppy about any and every statement by any tom, dick and harry.
Sure, anything else sir? and EU is not any tom dick and harry, WaPo, WSJ is, not EU but since you have repeatedly called it worthless here is wiki link for starters to know about EU
European Union - Wikipedia after that we will slowly read about Indian Government and Ministries EU centric approach, negotiations, and how seriously India takes it.
Amazing the length people goes to defend blunder and incompetence!
