Quantum Radars : What Are They?
- Thread starter _Anonymous_
- Start date
Countries have satellites that can shoot pictures so fast that they can run at the same framerate as videos. This includes non-visual light images as well.
Here's the Jilin, which is a civilian satellite.
So whatever you say is largely verifiable by someone. Especially in hotspots like the LAC.
Good luck detecting gun shots from space! Or a small anti aircraft gun shots from space, like what China is bringing. Good luck for 24 hours coverage of the spot as well. And good luck that no cloud obstructs your field of vision or no shadow obstructs it or your target is not being occluded by geographical features like hills. And certainly good luck to detect a bullet or a shell travelling from space.
Also, who will validate that satellite image is not forged? For lulz, I made deep-fakes of Chinese soldiers begging on their feet. I don't post them because things are sensitive these days. I actually tested them against known detectors of digital forgery (like the one Arsalan once linked). It didn't detect anything. I thought I will post them but then I decided against it. There is enough mess already.
Last but not the least, the very nature of these evidences. Presence of evidence (like satellite image of an artillery blast) may mean that such an incidence happened. Absence of such evidence does not necessarily mean that such an event did not happen. India (or China) can always claim that the other side attacked first and it happened during night or happened when it was cloudy or happened when no one was watching. The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
Last edited:
As I said, good luck with that. There has not been a single incidence when a gun fire in a hilly region (or any damn region for that matter) has been successfully proven by a satellite image.
Says the guy who suggests detecting gun shots from satellites.
If I did say that, I'm pretty sure you can link me to that quote.
Whats the point of mentioning this when the conversation was about "who opened gun fires?"
If you are bringing satellite images to detect gun battle or at best light artillery shelling, I don't know who is weird.
Sadly the extent of your knowledge starts and ends at who fired first. Probably from all your experience watching gunfights in Bollywood.
Troops first have to place themselves into positions before one fires at someone else. Any attempt at doing so is considered a hostile act. And this could even be as simple as arming yourself with your rifle, and not just keeping it holstered as is normally the case. Troops have to space themselves, hold positions, move in formation etc, all of this long before the first shot is fired. A satellite can see all that. And this is not even counting cameras carried by the troops.
So it's best you leave Bollywood somewhere else before you start typing here.
As I said, you are a very weird fellow. You like to focus on the exact when you do not even know enough to generalise.
just gunshots.....nah we can do more we can even identify faces dont ask me how.
If it's only radar then it will not resolve anything smaller than a few meters or maybe half a meter . That's simply because of the wavelength limit of radio waves. you will somehow need to integrate sub millimetre wave technology for facial detection.
Last edited:
cough...cough......nothing more to add.
they are used in cars for example but not some thing you can use from a distance of 500km.
Future can even mean tomorrow actually, since these technologies have been in the works since the last 10-15 years. These new-gen, all-weather disruptive technologies are among the most deepest state secrets. So I obviously can't put a date on them. But it's reached a point where we are talking about the foreseeable future, and that includes the possiblity of it already being operational in some capacity somewhere.
We are currently at the threshold of going to the next level beyond electronics.
The truth: These technologies are already operational in lab conditions. China officially announced this tech has been under field testing since 2016. The Russians claimed to have an operational system by 2021. The Americans are also likely to be testing these technologies. Obviously India is also more or less at this stage as well, we aren't behind.
The world is in the process of entering the Fourth Industrial Revolution. And moving beyond electronics is the foundation it will be based on.
Well, face detection using Radar is not completely unheard of, it is actually possible. That said, its use in a real weapon is a bit doubtful. I have a prototype based on a modified WiFi AP and it can detect human contour quite well. Actually it works a bit better than Kinect sensor from 2010 or so.
The point was explicity about "Who fired the first bullet". It cann't be clearer than that because of treaties and confidence building measures and PR stunts around that. The comment was a response to a series of tweets. Please read the entire context before opening your stupid trap and spewing ad-hominems.
Also, care to explain how "Troops first have to place themselves into positions" can be used as a evidence of who fired first? Do you have a source or a prior use of satellite feed which proved who was responsible for starting gun battles? If not then shut up.
Probably you watch too many sci-fi... most likely Chinese ones.
Source of the claim? Any evidence of such a use in past?
Huh?
Have you seen the video of scuffle between Indian and Chinese forces? If someone fires a bullet in such a fight, good luck for your satellite to detect anything.
Also, source or evidence of such a use of satellite imagery, specifically to detect use of small firearms like guns. If you don't have then its your speculation or rather fantasy.
I told ya already. No point in pursuing the exact, when you can't even generalise properly.
And then you don't even know what you yourself said.
This was your very first statement: Problem with this analysis is that none of the countries can produce any evidence of who did what.
The answer to that is, they will know.