Fire on the territory of the military unit in the Bryansk region. A park with military equipment brought from Ukraine for repairs is on fire.
Destruction and capture of Russian mercenaries in the Steblyanka by the 93Brigade and border guards
Three enemy ammunition depots, a tank and cars were destroyed by our army in the Kherson region the day before. This was reported in the operational command "South". At the same time - the operational group "East" reports 20 liquidated invaders as of the end of last day. And yet - destroyed the BMP and three enemy drones.
tin has slipped somewhat it seems. 
Are you being deliberately obtuse, or is this your natural state?
DSMAC uses either an IIR or radar seeker that images the target area so that a computer unit can compare it with a stored image of the target site. Or put another way, if a mobile phone was being used to automatically compare a visual input with stored target image data for the purpose of guided a missile or bomb, then yes, it would be a seeker.
View attachment 23900
View attachment 23901
View attachment 23903
- Nose cap. Seals off forward end of radome and provides protection during reentry.
- Impact fuze. Used to detonate warhead in surface burst option.
- Stabilized antenna. Allows radar unit to transmit and receive radio frequency (RF) energy.
- Support structure. Conical aluminum assembly wrapped with an ablative heat shield.
- Radar unit. Provides target site information to PAC for comparison with stored target site information.
- Quick access splice segment. Eight splice segments allow mating the radar section to the warhead section.
- Impact fuze. Four fuzes used to detonate warhead in surface burst option.
- Radome. Reinforced glass/epoxy shell that covers radar unit antenna. It also acts as a heatshield.
Dude, seriously. You don't like the West but you like Russia because Britain used a boat to get to Asia and Russia invaded it by land. So is this a boat thing?
Since when is a radar or IIR seeker head, not a seeker? Critical thinker.It's still not a seeker. In any case, there are many versions of the Iskander, what Russia has the cheapest and the most of is the basic version with only INS, like ATACMS.



Because it is. Look at where the bulk of the Z support base is. Young, dumb people.He's made it sound like it's a reading list for juvenile pro-Russians
Since when is a radar or IIR seeker head, not a seeker? Critical thinker.
Russia uses the M variant, which has DSMAC. GLONASS is likely jammed.
View attachment 23915
View attachment 23916
Because it is. Look at where the bulk of the Z support base is. Young, dumb people.
Yeah, a terminal guidance system, which is called a seeker. What? How does that statement even make sense to you? IFF is basically a kind of radio. DSMAC has a seeker that images the target area, and compares it with an image of the target so that it knows what area to hit.DSMAC is just a guidance system. You are basically pretending an IFF can also work like radar.
Also, as I said before, the cheap Iskander version doesn't have DSMAC, TERCOM etc, just INS.
Stop wasting time with your silly BS.