They have released a new tender for suppliers of VL-SRSAM to be delivered within a year. I believe there was a redesign around 2022-23, and now they are retesting everything. We have also seen the VLS redesign tenders previously.
Couldn't confirm if this was the new VLS or the same old one.DRDO & Indian Navy successfully flight-test indigenously-developed Vertically-Launched Short-Range Surface-to-Air Missile
Posted On: 26 MAR 2025 8:13PM by PIB Delhi
This missile system will be an excellent force multiplier for Indian Navy: Raksha Mantri
Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO) and the Indian Navy conducted the successful flight-test of indigenously-developed Vertically-Launched Short-Range Surface-to-Air Missile (VLSRSAM) from the Integrated Test Range (ITR), Chandipur off the coast of Odisha at about 1200 hrs on March 26, 2025. The flight-test was carried out from a land-based vertical launcher against a high-speed aerial target at very close range and low altitude. It has established the Near-Boundary-Low Altitude capability of the missile system.
![]()
During the test, the target was completely destroyed by the missile executing the high turn rate required for engaging targets at very close range, and establishing the missile’s agility, reliability & pin-point accuracy. The test was conducted with all weapon system elements deployed in combat configuration. These elements, including missile with indigenous Radio Frequency seeker, Multi-Function Radar and Weapon Control System, have performed as per expectations. The performance of the system was validated by the flight data captured by various Range Instruments developed by ITR Chandipur.
Congratulating DRDO, Indian Navy and the industry, Raksha Mantri Shri Rajnath Singh termed the missile system as proof of India’s strong design and development capabilities in defence R&D. It will be an excellent force multiplier for the Indian Navy, he said.
View attachment 41853
![]()
The room looks very sophisticated with wooden desi door and hanger on the wall.
The environment our top scientist work in really surprises me sometimes.The room looks very sophisticated with wooden desi door and hanger on the wall.




I think 200 km is the detection Range at 2m² RCS and 80 km would be the detection Range at 0.2m² RCS.As we have already seen , it is likely the Govt quoted range for this may be true figure wrt the radars detection capability. Naturally it makes no sense to make only a single pulse version of VL Astra when dual pulse is in every other sam system made today. Neither there is much logic in having a 30 km interceptor where the radar can detect from 200km sort of distance. 80km detection and 30km intercept is good for ground and naval SR use of course, but with available tech can be multi layered and for that 200km detection with 80km engagement would be good chosen parameter, even if the word short range is in there.
if instrumented range for long range search (LRS mode) is > 300km as suggested, then no need to worry over small rcs system. Even if a stealth jet is the adversary, it will either use a standoff weapon like a subsonic antiship cruise missile with stealth feature in which case the target would be the vector coming towards the ship, not the stealth jet. Given the terrain avoidance warning system algo also detects > 200km, that small 0.2m2 rcs object will be detected well in excess of 100km , perhaps at around 140-170km zone with enough time to track and decision to engage because that vector will obviously have few more waypoint to cover before attacking its target. So any one ship with this radar will be able to classify this threat vector quite early and deploy the kill chain.I think 200 km is the detection Range at 2m² RCS and 80 km would be the detection Range at 0.2m² RCS.
I don't think anyone designer would risk a 70 km class Medium Range SAM being guided by a Radar which has a 80 km detection Range for 0.2m² RCS
For comparison Arudhra MPR (kind of Indian equivalent to EL/M 2084 of MRSAM) has a 160 km detection Range for 0.2m² RCS
I thought the 80km range was stated both in the MoDs end of year report and the parliamentary report? Its been confirmed for a long time no?if instrumented range for long range search (LRS mode) is > 300km as suggested, then no need to worry over small rcs system. Even if a stealth jet is the adversary, it will either use a standoff weapon like a subsonic antiship cruise missile with stealth feature in which case the target would be the vector coming towards the ship, not the stealth jet. Given the terrain avoidance warning system algo also detects > 200km, that small 0.2m2 rcs object will be detected well in excess of 100km , perhaps at around 140-170km zone with enough time to track and decision to engage because that vector will obviously have few more waypoint to cover before attacking its target. So any one ship with this radar will be able to classify this threat vector quite early and deploy the kill chain.
Also for MRSAM ie any medium range SAM, its detection range would be in excess of 200km even 10-15 years ago. This 80km disputed part was about Akash like short range sam system, where engagement is in a 30km bubble hard kill zone. SRSAM systems usually work with such detection & engagement zone figure. MRSAM LRSAM systems will likely be higher naturally, hence 200km+ tracking and 80km range for VL-SRSAM fits ie that 80km stated range in the doc was no mistake perhaps. This weapon complex can still have a 30km single pulse variant if it wish to deploy such, only weight & space penalty will be there.
yes but not sure if its engagement or detection range which was quoted.I thought the 80km range was stated both in the MoDs end of year report and the parliamentary report? Its been confirmed for a long time no?