Now we have a proper source from UK about this news.
Nice, thats half the fleet.RFP No. AIR HQ/82841/2/ENGA7(TECH) BM-I (PC1) DT JUL 26
SDR integration on MiG-29 ac 36 Aircraft (29 Fighter and 7 Trainer)
Project duration: 18 months
Integration of Spice 1000 on wing store stations of Mirage 2000 I/TI aircraft completed, Carriage & Handling and System evaluation flight trials completed.
Was trying to read up on this and surprised to learn:Well, he has just said the quiet part aloud. See the last three paras of this tweet. Tweet is even relevant for the FCAS situation.
https://x.com/hukum2082/status/1895859153287234035
Let me tell you a story : He is at best a place holder in the larger scheme of things.
The IAF as an org is ideologically aligned with inducting the Rafale.Large parts of its operational doctrine and CAPEX is aligned with the induction of this “game changer”
The elite Vajra cult spent a whopping $2.2Bn on upgrading the Mirage-2000 H/TH to I/TI standard. So much so that the Su-30MKI mid life upgrades were completely put on the back burner.
These shenanigans got exposed when the SU-30MKIs were found wanting in BVR engagements against a principal adversary.The Flanker is at best a Bhishma Pitamah in the larger scheme of things.
The Tejas Mk1 and Mk1A isn’t their blue eyed boy. It is just a promising kid who got admitted on an EWS quota.The boy will be allowed to rise but not too much as it doesn’t belong to the elite clan.
The leadership will hem and haw and make all the right noises but not commit wholeheartedly to the program.This is a class war where the loyal knights will sacrifice themselves to protect the crown prince from the peasants.
As far as the AMCA goes , it was chai biskoot time pass until the PAF started making the right noises about inducting the J-35s.
That shook Vayu Bhawan out of its slumber and suddenly the AMCA was too late and too slow despite the org being fully aware that the CCS approval was allowed to drag for a good 3-4 years.
Suddenly it was no more Chai Biskoot , 5th Gen required a quick fix solution and what could sound more politically correct and visually pleasing than the F-35.
The F-35 might or might not make it but you get the drift.The IAF’s Plan B remains the Rafale and it will use “साम, दाम, भेद “ to induct it.The Tejas Mk2 attaining primacy is a nightmare which makes the cult wake up drenched in sweat.
The Tejas is a compromise candidate which was inducted because the defence minister of the day understood the organisational politics and cracked the whip.
The commoner “Mk2” can never be allowed to be the crown prince.That would be sacrilege of the highest order.Long live the Cult !
End
Disclaimer : “The characters in this story are entirely fictional, and any resemblance to actual persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental."
Top brass split over Mirage upgrade
With the USD 2.4 billion Mirage-2000 upgrade deal with France in its final stages, India’s defense ministry and air force top brass seem to be split over the high costs and likely benefits to the country’s future air power needs. Among points of contention is the deal cost to upgrade the 52 Mirage-2000 combat aircraft by French company Dassault Aviation. Taking into account $1 billion for new weapons and another USD 500 million for new facilities at Bangalore-based Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) for the upgrade, the cost could rise to USD 3.9 billion, the officials said.
“In fact, Thales and MBDA were initially quoting much more,” says IAF officers.



India bought 52 Mirage-2000s in 1982 and fully inducted these into the IAF in 1986.
“But even at this cost and age, an upgraded Mirage can operate efficiently for another 20 years and still be a potent, frontline fighter jet. The upgrade of the Mirages would provide it a fourth generation combat jet capability,” the officers told IANS
IAF officers also noted that Israel had also offered to upgrade the Mirages, but at half the price. But the defence ministry quoted an old policy that only OEMs could carry out an upgrade.
Mirage math: Israel better than France
Israel is close to swinging an order to upgrade French-origin Mirage 2000 aircraft with the Indian Air Force (IAF) despite France’s charm offensive in hosting the Indian military on the Champs Elysees. In a rare honour, contingents of the Indian armed forces led the Bastille Day parade.



That may well be true. But did the IAF/MOD spend the money on the upgrade wisely? What is the lost opportunity cost of rejecting the Israeli offer? Why was the IAF confident this will remain a front line fighter into the 2040s only to have to pull in Rafales into that role for the 2030s? Why was the IAF/MoD so confident of the MICA purchase to spend over a Billion dollars, only to turn out to largely be a non-factor? What lessons can be learnt from this debacle?Mirages are Still very useful
For Both Long Range Precision strikes and BAR CAPs
And they were used in the recent conflict with the Barbarians of the West
Israel offer was never a serious one. A third party cant just come in and upgrade a modern fighter without access to mission computer and its interfaces. Israel operated Mirage 5 and the kit was based on it. Which is of a different generation. The offer was absurd, don't go by the sponsored articles; some of us lived through it. You would have made the same accusations of corruption and incompetence if they had chosen that path.How kind of the French to give India a discount.
The upgrades were to be done in 2021, so initial plan was to fly M2K till 2041 !!
I am at a complete loss for words. Was no one investigated for corruption or plain incompetence?
Bwahahahaha
This just keeps getting better.
The IAF has opted for cheaper third-party upgrades over OEM packages wherever it made sense (as in the case of Mi-24/35s in the early 2000s).That may well be true. But did the IAF/MOD spend the money on the upgrade wisely? What is the lost opportunity cost of rejecting the Israeli offer? Why was the IAF confident this will remain a front line fighter into the 2040s only to have to pull in Rafales into that role for the 2030s? Why was the IAF/MoD so confident of the MICA purchase to spend over a Billion dollars, only to turn out to largely be a non-factor? What lessons can be learnt from this debacle?
I hope there is a CAG report on this at some time given the fortune spent on it... will be very illuminating.
Is there a repeat of this saga for the almost similar amount ~$1.7B to be spent for the upgrades of the previous 36 Rafales to F4 standards?
More importantly, given that the F4->F5 is not priced into the steep purchase cost of the 114 Rafales, what safeguards should be part of the contract? Are the F5 MLU upgrades priced in at some discount? Are Indian CCAs (Ghatak, long-serious-funding-overdue CATS, Abhimanyu etc.) and weapons priced in for future independent upgrades by India? What are the terms for the upgrade to be done not by Dassault, but by HAL or the Indian private sector -- are there guarantees that France will not reject air worthiness certification, etc. given past experience?
A third party cant just come in and upgrade a modern fighter without access to mission computer and its interfaces. Israel operated Mirage 5 and the kit was based on it. Which is of a different generation. The offer was absurd, don't go by the sponsored articles; some of us lived through it. You would have made the same accusations of corruption and incompetence if they had chosen that path.
I suspect we signed up with DA for M2000 upg to keep the RC-400 radar + MICA BVR out of Pakistani hands. Plus French govt pressure would've also played a part as it would've voided warranties and certification.
The IAF has opted for cheaper third-party upgrades over OEM packages wherever it made sense (as in the case of Mi-24/35s in the early 2000s).
But the defence ministry quoted an old policy that only OEMs could carry out an upgrade
I dont know where you got this idea. It uses Modular Data Processing Unit (MDPU) by Dassault. You pay them for each integration. There is no indian MC.But didn't India pay additional money anyway to add its own MC afterwards for the Spice bombs? Couldn't DA engagement be limited to just the Indian MC interfacing?
Involving HAL was unnecessary given the small number of airframes. Should have followed the Mig-29UPG model.Not upgrading was never an option because of delays with LCA and MMRCA. The french always quoted high because they can. The high price is also because of the screwdrivergiri by HAL. Their craftsmanship resulted in years of delay and a crash with two pilots killed.
This is an interface on top of MDPU as shown in the diagram. All possible because of French upgrade with MDPU.This is the HAL MC to handle the Indian (and by extension I assume Israeli) weapons:
View attachment 53742
Shown interfacing with the MDPU:
View attachment 53743
We'd have run into spares/servicing problems had we gone in for the Israeli kit which was essentially a grey market upgrade. This would've in turn affected the availability of the IAFs premier strike fighter + n delivery vector. A chance the IAF just couldn't afford to take.I suspect part of it is to collect France's UNSC veto as a back up to the Russian one. But the last statement is concerning, particularly keeping Rafale on the Indian "network" as India's MIC grows from strength to strength. I get the sense IAF will be made to pay through the nose for each of the additional ISEs required in the next decade on Rafales.
It's not clear whether this was priced in the Israeli plan. But it was also not in the original $2.4B upgrade plan per above article.If it was part of the deal, it would also have inflated the deal size, right?
This would've in turn affected the availability of the IAFs premier strike fighter + n delivery vector. A chance the IAF just couldn't afford to take.
No official confirmation, afaik. But I doubt Spice family munitions could've been integrated without the FOC std upgrades (HAL MC) having been completed.BTW, was there any confirmation that HAL finished the upgrades? Seems there were again engine parts supply issues, Covid disruptions, crash inquiry, etc.