So can they be used target aircraft carrier ?
Yep.So can they be used target aircraft carrier ?
30 min is for full FoV update. The satellite can provide a 5-10 min update in a few user-designated high-priority areas. The speed of a refresh rate depends on the size of the high-priority area. If a CBG has been identified updated imagery will come in at less than 5 mins.Even for 30 minute update, a carrier at max can travel to 30-35 km from last known position.
With previous data with some AI(statistics), we can narrow down the uncertainty in position and speed of carrier.
The OODA loop will look like this:LRAShM has 60km of range for it's seeker.
So can we target a carrier with just this satellite ?
(I am not very versed in kill chain)
Yep.
30 min is for full FoV update. The satellite can provide a 5-10 min update in a few user-designated high-priority areas. The speed of a refresh rate depends on the size of the high-priority area. If a CBG has been identified updated imagery will come in at less than 5 mins.
The OODA loop will look like this:
Navy's surface fleet will probably be the first to identify an incoming CBG. GISAT series/RISAT series/CARTOSAT series will provide near-real time target positions. NAVIC series will provide precise co-ordinates for targeting. These co-ordinates will be fed on to the GNC of say LRAShMs &/or Brahmos etc. The missiles will fly using their INS-GNC system, get close to the target to use their own seekers. Here, the Navy's surface ships can provide additional guidance using data link, guiding the missiles to target.
We have a kill chain. What we don't have is redundancy. We don't have enough sats, enough ships, enough missiles etc. to make this a sure shot. Now with private space startups providing imagery to the MoD, some of the gaps are getting filled. We are still at least a decade away from having a proper redundancy.
We badly need weekly launches & much bigger heavy lift launch vehicles. I genuinely don’t understand why this never ending lethargy continues. In 2024, we put only around 8 tonnes of cargo into space, compared with 174 tonnes by China, 95 tonnes by Russia & a whopping 2,181 tonnes by the USA. For a 4 trillion $ + economy, this is honestly embarrassing. It is high time we stop moving at a snail pace, get our act together & start thinking & executing at the scale which is expected for a country of our size.
We can also work with other neutral countries who don't wanna side with USA or China/Russia.We badly need weekly launches & much bigger heavy lift launch vehicles. I genuinely don’t understand why this never ending lethargy continues. In 2024, we put only around 8 tonnes of cargo into space, compared with 174 tonnes by China, 95 tonnes by Russia & a whopping 2,181 tonnes by the USA. For a 4 trillion $ + economy, this is honestly embarrassing. It is high time we stop moving at a snail pace, get our act together & start thinking & executing at the scale which is expected for a country of our size.
Agreed, commercializing satellite buses (where a customer can add their own payloads), ride to space, data relay services, landers, deep space communication, possibilities are limitless.We can also work with other neutral countries who don't wanna side with USA or China/Russia.
Being non aligned has many disadvantages, but still has some good advantages .
We need space diplomacy, many countries like UAE, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia and others would love to have their satellites (including militry one) in space.
Infact, indian private sectors can make good satellites and can ever make lander/rovers (with help with ISRO), we can offer them complete solutions from orbitor/lander/rover to moon/mars once we have powerful rockets.
Agreed, commercializing satellite buses (where a customer can add their own payloads), ride to space, data relay services, landers, deep space communication, possibilities are limitless.
I had espoused similar views earlier about Jitrenda. I wasn't aware GS was on the same wavelength:
View attachment 53856
theprint.in
Final Accountability Rests on the Minister concerned with ISRO
So There is no harm in Taking Credit
Just as MODI JI takes credit for Infrastructure projects
And HRD Minister resigns because a Professor ie Paper Setter Leaked the NEET papers
If one wants credit for the successes, one must also shield the team during failures. Review his tweet behavior, when ISRO hits a failure -- he disappears.
He does deserve some credit for opening up the private sector... but even that is something I doubt he 'fought' for.
Yet another example of a successful mission. I will wait till you can find a tweet where he accepts responsibility for a mission failure.Without Political Oversight NO Government department works properly
That is why ISRO and DAE have always been under the PMO
Mr Jitendra Singh is MOS in the PMO
Yet another example of a successful mission. I will wait till you can find a tweet where he accepts responsibility for a mission failure.
I'm glad that you're backWe can also work with other neutral countries who don't wanna side with USA or China/Russia.
Being non aligned has many disadvantages, but still has some good advantages .
We need space diplomacy, many countries like UAE, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia and others would love to have their satellites (including militry one) in space.
Infact, indian private sectors can make good satellites and can ever make lander/rovers (with help with ISRO), we can offer them complete solutions from orbitor/lander/rover to moon/mars once we have powerful rockets.
I had espoused similar views earlier about Jitrenda. I wasn't aware GS was on the same wavelength:
View attachment 53856