1) We market our food grains in mandi not food stuff and food grains are state subject not come under central govt. Under concurrent list, center has no right to make rules for food grain marketing. Center govt is forcing these new rules made for food stuff trading over APMC Mandis. Not acceptable!
Which has to be decided by the court, not by protest. Protesters are asking to revert bills all over Indian, not in just Punjab and haryana. Which is simply impossible.
2) These new bills, if interoduced will destroy APMC Mandi system in max. 4-5 years and MSP will be gone in the absence of APMC. Then private mandis & its middleman with unlimited storage capacity, introduced under these new laws will exploit farmers in the absence of APMC Mandis.
But, Even after this bill farmers can still go to these Mandi's and do everything old school way. If the majority of farmers still depended on those how can government abolish it? Logic don't make sense. If your claims are correct then why would farmers leave these "agents"?
By simple definition state service tax and 'commission agents' are exploiting farmers of their produce. So if farmer thinks private mandis will be less exploitive then who are you to stop them.
State's job in a free market is to give multiple options thus freedom, not to interfere in business. Which is exactly what this bill is doing.
3) Under contracting law, everything from seeds, fertilizers to machinery etc. will be provided by company and there no surety that company will buy all produce! If there is extra production and low demand, company can reject the produce under quality clause and loss will be incurred by farmer. If there is high demand for that product, extra profit will go company, not farmer. So if there is a loss, it will be farmers and if there is an extra profit, it will be companies.
The entire paragraph is misinformation. Its hilarious that you believe this.
Show me in the bill where it says so. There are no such restrictions.
The only thing true here is market price. Risk-taker will benefit when the price goes up and suffer when it goes down. No one can predict the prices when making the contract. Thus the company is giving an estimate which the farmer can reject and go for a better offer. On the downside, the price crashes company suffers.
Even in this scenario, government mandis still exists!.
3) So, in short period of time farming will be made so expensive that farmers will be forced to either sell their lands and give those lands to companies on long term leases and farmers will work over their own lands as labor. Not acceptable at all!
Again, random claims not worth commenting on.
Contract farming exists in multiple states and working very well. Its up to the farmer to choose it or not. You are no one to dictate that. The current situation is what ludicrous in a country like India. Ensuring farming to be least productive and inefficient so that we can cry over poor farmers forever.
Let me ask this again:
How is skipping the middleman and giving the money directly to the farmer a bad thing?
But again, I agree with your overall point. APMC/state-regulated structure will be destroyed over time. That fear is true.
Which is a good thing for farmers, the environment, industry, and the overall economy. There is simply no other way to reform this sector.
Honestly, these two states should be allowed to continue their anarchic system. Amend the bill by excluding these two states. Let the other BIMARU states take this opportunity to its fullest. Decades down the line the poor economic performance and ecological destruction will make them reform themselves.