Akash Series Surface to Air Missile System

'Akash missile system can't be trusted during war': Degraded by govt defence agencies, loopholes in strategic weapon system threaten national security - Firstpost

On 3 June, 2018, Akash Missile's Transportation and Loading Vehicle (TLV), parked at an Air Force Squadron, was jolted after a sudden burst of tube followed by shearing off wheel bolts due to impact. The incident shocked Air Force headquarters. The Air Force officials wanted not only wanted the routine analysis of the incident, but also an in-depth discussion with Defence Research and Development Laboratory (DRDL), a multi-disciplinary Missile System laboratory under the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) to unearth issues hampering the functioning of the strategic weapon system.

More than a month later, another squadron reported cracks on air intake caps of dummy missiles. An investigation by Firstpost revealed that the incidents were followed by other squadrons reporting frequent unserviceability of mobile surface-to-air Akash Missile system and long duration downtime, which means that the missiles are dysfunctional and may not be cocked and loaded against enemy in contingency. This incident forced Guided Weapon Maintenance Department of Air Force on 5 September 2018 to raise the issue, where they clearly stated that the "Squadrons have been reporting frequent unserviceability of Missiles and it has been noticed that time taken to resolve these failures is considerably high due to delay in analysis of failures."

The sheer inertia of government defence enterprise involved in Akash Missile production and maintenance reached to such an alarming level that at least three squadrons of Akash in February 2019 reported that missile system remained down or simply broken and sometimes even out of order during 90 percent of the time since their date of commissioning. These squadrons were commissioned between 2013-2015 to counter Chinese aggression.

Multiple government agencies, including Missile manufacturer Bharat Dynamics Limited (BDL) which comes under the Ministry of Defence, Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL) which is responsible for radars and maintenance and the DRDO, did not tell the truth to the government about malfunctioning Akash Missile system and poor quality of spare parts provided by the private vendors.

The malfunction of Integrated Air Compressor and Storage Facility (IACSF) revealed another shocker and the Air Force mentioned it on record that the IACSFs of Akash Missile System units are unserviceable due to wobbling and vibration, pneumatic leakage, breaking of mounting pads and bolts. A missile had failed to take off during combined guided weapon firing exercise known as 'CROSSBOW-18' and a team of Missile System Quality Assurance Agency (MSQAA), BDL and DRDL was constituted to investigate the failure.

825-akash-getty-min.jpg


If there is an emergent situation, several Akash sqaudron may not be able to launch counter offensive because deficiencies in many of the system including hydraulic oil leakage and container pressure leakage, which is pending since 2017. Getty Images

MSQAA is an independent inspection Agency under the administrative and functional control of Director General Aeronautical Quality Assurance, which comes under the Department of Defence Production of Defence Ministry. The incidents of leakage from fuel tanks and leakage in pressurised Missile containers were taken so lightly that the Air Force, responsible to secure the nation from aerial threats, was forced to direct to the DRDL, BEL and BDL that present configuration of certain systems of Akash Missile will not be acceptable for future squadrons, which are under the process of procurement. The Air Force, BDL, BEL and DRDL are yet to respond to a questionnaire sent by Firstpost on 24 November.

Details expose criminal act by government defence enterprises

If there is an emergent situation, several Akash sqaudron may not be able to launch counter offensive because deficiencies in many of the system including hydraulic oil leakage and container pressure leakage, which is pending since 2017. The complaints received from Air Force headquarters, Eastern Air Command and other Akash field units reveals there is no back-to-back agreement with vendors for equipment under warranty, making it difficult to repair the faults. Documents reviewed by Firstpost showed that almost all squadrons have expressed that they are unable to get proper feedback from BEL on repairing the faults in Missile System and on problems plaguing Akash Missiles which Indian agencies are ill-equipped to resolve. Surprisingly the field engineers, who are supposed to rectify the critical snags, are not even aware of any action plan.

Documents further said: "Currently majority of the Akash field engineers are working to pass information about issues without any tangible technical output. The untrained and poorly equipped field engineers are neither aware of any corrective action plan nor they are committed."

The documents also pointed to massive delay in supply of spares for Missile System, virtually grounding them for for six months to a year. Air Force in a meeting had informed that most of the problems reported in 2017 were pending for over a year now. The documents also pointed at the repairing of Akash trailers which are covered under annual maintenance contract. It said: "Akash Trailers serviceability is poor and some cases spares supplied to Akash Missile units are not configured as per system requirement which is affecting equipment serviceability in case of failure."

Bharat Dynamics Limited (BDL) the manufacturer of Akash Missile has not been able to resolve three important issues for the last two to three years. BDL, founded in 1970, is a government enterprise under the administrative control of the Ministry of Defence. It is learnt that BDL was told in high level meeting convened last year to come out with solid plan after conducting an investigation and study of faults in Akash Missile System within a month on long delays of critical faults. Even the investigation to unearth and address the issues was delayed.

825-akash-missile-getty.jpg


Some spares for Akash Missiles are not fit and functional and this is affecting the equipment serviceability in case of failure. Getty Images

The Air Force has refused to pay for new maintenance contract for certain Akash Missile squadrons as the old ones expired in September 2019. They argued that missile systems in several squadrons were left idle for more than a year. Instead, it had asked for extension of warranty for certain squadrons which have been dysfunctional for 17 to 15 months in the last two years. Air Force asserted since system was down and faults were neither rectified nor replaced, it violated the maintenance contract. Air Force is learnt to have said that "during the warranty period, the seller shall either replace or rectify the failed goods free of charge within 30 days of notification of such defects. As per article of the contract, warranty of the equipment would be extended by such duration from time the buyer has reported such unserviceabilities till the time seller has restored the status of the buyer's satisfaction."

Red tapeism in government defence enterprises hurt national security

Firstpost investigation also revealed gross inefficiency of government defence agencies BEL, BDL and DRDL to address the problem in Akash Missile System. Documents reveal that meetings after meetings were convened on the issues but the government defence enterprises couldn't satisfactorily answer the questions raised by Air Force. These government defence enterprises have been passing the buck. They also cheated Air Force by providing substandard and fake spares.

A meeting earlier this year chaired by Air Vice Marshal Bhanoji Rao pointed at severe negligence in handling Akash Missile System which may have serious ramifications in contingency. Documents revealed that certain spares, especially those of sub-vendors (procured by BEL) were being received at Akash Missile System units without 'Quality Assurance' certification and on a few instances it came to light that these spares were old and fake. In a letter, it was noted: "On few instances it has been noticed that the items were not new/authentic."

Air Vice Marshal Rao clearly told his team at the Air Force not to accept spares without 'Quality Assurance' certification. The meeting also revealed a lack of expertise of government-owned defence enterprises which are acting merely as a supplier of equipment after procuring it from domestic and foreign vendors. It basically means that these government enterprises are acting like a payment facilitators. Their complicity in this entire saga was further exposed when government defence enterprises officials told the senior Air Force officials that sub-vendors (private companies supplying spares) were not willing to share their design documents.

An appalled Air Vice Marshal asked, if the Defence Research and Development Laboratory (DRDL) is the authority then it must have intellectual property rights of all designs related to Akash Missile System. Obviously, the defence agencies representatives were not aware about it since they never took the pain to look into the agreements and promised the Air Force to look into the matter to ascertain whether these rights were with vendors. A promise was made to list all major vendors for unhindered supply of spares to overcome single vendor situation. As far as BEL is concerned documents said: "Almost all squadrons have expressed that they are unable to get proper feedbacks from BEL on progress and plan of action of pending faults."

The meeting chaired by Air Vice Marshal Rao also discussed high failure rate of one of the systems of Akash Missile, lacunae in analysis of faults and mismatch in software versions used for the this strategic weapon.

Another major loophole, which highlights the non-seriousness of defence agencies, is the contract with the private vendors. The agreements are more favorable to private parties putting Akash Missile System in jeopardy. Documents flagged these concerns further pointing out that all the vendor supplied items are outside their warranty obligations and in certain cases supplied spares are not configured as per system requirements. Some spares for Akash Missiles are not fit and functional and this is affecting the equipment serviceability in case of failure.

It appears that careless handling of most critical weapons has been going on for a long time. The Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) was perhaps far-sighted when in a 2017 report, the national auditor observed that Akash Missiles cannot be trusted in situation of a war. CAG had categorically stated that Akash missile system delivered by BEL were deficient in quality and 30% missiles failed the test.

"Audit found that the Strategic missile system delivered by BEL were deficient in quality. Out of 80 missiles received up to November 2014, 20 missiles were test fired during April-November 2014. Six of these missiles i.e., 30 percent, failed the test. Preliminary failure analysis report revealed that the missiles fell short of the target, had lower than the required velocity, and also there was malfunctioning of critical units like Servo Control Unit and Connector. Two missiles had failed to take off because the booster nozzle had failed. These deficiencies posed an operational risk during hostilities. Two missiles had failed to take off because the booster nozzle had failed. These deficiencies posed an operational risk during hostilities." CAG report had said.

Firstpost investigation showed that after the CAG report, the squabbling between government defence enterprises had come to light. Eight critical snags in Akash Missile Systems were reported after the CAG report which were pending for three-seven months. CAG had recommended that Ministry of Defence needs to ensure better synchronisation of the various activities and agencies involved in such strategically important projects to ensure their timely completion and quality of Strategic Missiles also needs improvement so as to bring down failure rate.

Notwithstanding, many snags were not rectified citing lack of spares. The Air Force anguished over lackadaisical attitude of BEL and BDL has firmly directed them to resolve all internal issues immediately and ensure that no Missile is kept unserviceable due to their internal problems.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Apoorv
'Akash missile system can't be trusted during war': Degraded by govt defence agencies, loopholes in strategic weapon system threaten national security - Firstpost

On 3 June, 2018, Akash Missile's Transportation and Loading Vehicle (TLV), parked at an Air Force Squadron, was jolted after a sudden burst of tube followed by shearing off wheel bolts due to impact. The incident shocked Air Force headquarters. The Air Force officials wanted not only wanted the routine analysis of the incident, but also an in-depth discussion with Defence Research and Development Laboratory (DRDL), a multi-disciplinary Missile System laboratory under the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) to unearth issues hampering the functioning of the strategic weapon system.

More than a month later, another squadron reported cracks on air intake caps of dummy missiles. An investigation by Firstpost revealed that the incidents were followed by other squadrons reporting frequent unserviceability of mobile surface-to-air Akash Missile system and long duration downtime, which means that the missiles are dysfunctional and may not be cocked and loaded against enemy in contingency. This incident forced Guided Weapon Maintenance Department of Air Force on 5 September 2018 to raise the issue, where they clearly stated that the "Squadrons have been reporting frequent unserviceability of Missiles and it has been noticed that time taken to resolve these failures is considerably high due to delay in analysis of failures."

The sheer inertia of government defence enterprise involved in Akash Missile production and maintenance reached to such an alarming level that at least three squadrons of Akash in February 2019 reported that missile system remained down or simply broken and sometimes even out of order during 90 percent of the time since their date of commissioning. These squadrons were commissioned between 2013-2015 to counter Chinese aggression.

Multiple government agencies, including Missile manufacturer Bharat Dynamics Limited (BDL) which comes under the Ministry of Defence, Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL) which is responsible for radars and maintenance and the DRDO, did not tell the truth to the government about malfunctioning Akash Missile system and poor quality of spare parts provided by the private vendors.

The malfunction of Integrated Air Compressor and Storage Facility (IACSF) revealed another shocker and the Air Force mentioned it on record that the IACSFs of Akash Missile System units are unserviceable due to wobbling and vibration, pneumatic leakage, breaking of mounting pads and bolts. A missile had failed to take off during combined guided weapon firing exercise known as 'CROSSBOW-18' and a team of Missile System Quality Assurance Agency (MSQAA), BDL and DRDL was constituted to investigate the failure.

825-akash-getty-min.jpg


If there is an emergent situation, several Akash sqaudron may not be able to launch counter offensive because deficiencies in many of the system including hydraulic oil leakage and container pressure leakage, which is pending since 2017. Getty Images

MSQAA is an independent inspection Agency under the administrative and functional control of Director General Aeronautical Quality Assurance, which comes under the Department of Defence Production of Defence Ministry. The incidents of leakage from fuel tanks and leakage in pressurised Missile containers were taken so lightly that the Air Force, responsible to secure the nation from aerial threats, was forced to direct to the DRDL, BEL and BDL that present configuration of certain systems of Akash Missile will not be acceptable for future squadrons, which are under the process of procurement. The Air Force, BDL, BEL and DRDL are yet to respond to a questionnaire sent by Firstpost on 24 November.

Details expose criminal act by government defence enterprises

If there is an emergent situation, several Akash sqaudron may not be able to launch counter offensive because deficiencies in many of the system including hydraulic oil leakage and container pressure leakage, which is pending since 2017. The complaints received from Air Force headquarters, Eastern Air Command and other Akash field units reveals there is no back-to-back agreement with vendors for equipment under warranty, making it difficult to repair the faults. Documents reviewed by Firstpost showed that almost all squadrons have expressed that they are unable to get proper feedback from BEL on repairing the faults in Missile System and on problems plaguing Akash Missiles which Indian agencies are ill-equipped to resolve. Surprisingly the field engineers, who are supposed to rectify the critical snags, are not even aware of any action plan.

Documents further said: "Currently majority of the Akash field engineers are working to pass information about issues without any tangible technical output. The untrained and poorly equipped field engineers are neither aware of any corrective action plan nor they are committed."

The documents also pointed to massive delay in supply of spares for Missile System, virtually grounding them for for six months to a year. Air Force in a meeting had informed that most of the problems reported in 2017 were pending for over a year now. The documents also pointed at the repairing of Akash trailers which are covered under annual maintenance contract. It said: "Akash Trailers serviceability is poor and some cases spares supplied to Akash Missile units are not configured as per system requirement which is affecting equipment serviceability in case of failure."

Bharat Dynamics Limited (BDL) the manufacturer of Akash Missile has not been able to resolve three important issues for the last two to three years. BDL, founded in 1970, is a government enterprise under the administrative control of the Ministry of Defence. It is learnt that BDL was told in high level meeting convened last year to come out with solid plan after conducting an investigation and study of faults in Akash Missile System within a month on long delays of critical faults. Even the investigation to unearth and address the issues was delayed.

825-akash-missile-getty.jpg


Some spares for Akash Missiles are not fit and functional and this is affecting the equipment serviceability in case of failure. Getty Images

The Air Force has refused to pay for new maintenance contract for certain Akash Missile squadrons as the old ones expired in September 2019. They argued that missile systems in several squadrons were left idle for more than a year. Instead, it had asked for extension of warranty for certain squadrons which have been dysfunctional for 17 to 15 months in the last two years. Air Force asserted since system was down and faults were neither rectified nor replaced, it violated the maintenance contract. Air Force is learnt to have said that "during the warranty period, the seller shall either replace or rectify the failed goods free of charge within 30 days of notification of such defects. As per article of the contract, warranty of the equipment would be extended by such duration from time the buyer has reported such unserviceabilities till the time seller has restored the status of the buyer's satisfaction."

Red tapeism in government defence enterprises hurt national security

Firstpost investigation also revealed gross inefficiency of government defence agencies BEL, BDL and DRDL to address the problem in Akash Missile System. Documents reveal that meetings after meetings were convened on the issues but the government defence enterprises couldn't satisfactorily answer the questions raised by Air Force. These government defence enterprises have been passing the buck. They also cheated Air Force by providing substandard and fake spares.

A meeting earlier this year chaired by Air Vice Marshal Bhanoji Rao pointed at severe negligence in handling Akash Missile System which may have serious ramifications in contingency. Documents revealed that certain spares, especially those of sub-vendors (procured by BEL) were being received at Akash Missile System units without 'Quality Assurance' certification and on a few instances it came to light that these spares were old and fake. In a letter, it was noted: "On few instances it has been noticed that the items were not new/authentic."

Air Vice Marshal Rao clearly told his team at the Air Force not to accept spares without 'Quality Assurance' certification. The meeting also revealed a lack of expertise of government-owned defence enterprises which are acting merely as a supplier of equipment after procuring it from domestic and foreign vendors. It basically means that these government enterprises are acting like a payment facilitators. Their complicity in this entire saga was further exposed when government defence enterprises officials told the senior Air Force officials that sub-vendors (private companies supplying spares) were not willing to share their design documents.

An appalled Air Vice Marshal asked, if the Defence Research and Development Laboratory (DRDL) is the authority then it must have intellectual property rights of all designs related to Akash Missile System. Obviously, the defence agencies representatives were not aware about it since they never took the pain to look into the agreements and promised the Air Force to look into the matter to ascertain whether these rights were with vendors. A promise was made to list all major vendors for unhindered supply of spares to overcome single vendor situation. As far as BEL is concerned documents said: "Almost all squadrons have expressed that they are unable to get proper feedbacks from BEL on progress and plan of action of pending faults."

The meeting chaired by Air Vice Marshal Rao also discussed high failure rate of one of the systems of Akash Missile, lacunae in analysis of faults and mismatch in software versions used for the this strategic weapon.

Another major loophole, which highlights the non-seriousness of defence agencies, is the contract with the private vendors. The agreements are more favorable to private parties putting Akash Missile System in jeopardy. Documents flagged these concerns further pointing out that all the vendor supplied items are outside their warranty obligations and in certain cases supplied spares are not configured as per system requirements. Some spares for Akash Missiles are not fit and functional and this is affecting the equipment serviceability in case of failure.

It appears that careless handling of most critical weapons has been going on for a long time. The Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) was perhaps far-sighted when in a 2017 report, the national auditor observed that Akash Missiles cannot be trusted in situation of a war. CAG had categorically stated that Akash missile system delivered by BEL were deficient in quality and 30% missiles failed the test.

"Audit found that the Strategic missile system delivered by BEL were deficient in quality. Out of 80 missiles received up to November 2014, 20 missiles were test fired during April-November 2014. Six of these missiles i.e., 30 percent, failed the test. Preliminary failure analysis report revealed that the missiles fell short of the target, had lower than the required velocity, and also there was malfunctioning of critical units like Servo Control Unit and Connector. Two missiles had failed to take off because the booster nozzle had failed. These deficiencies posed an operational risk during hostilities. Two missiles had failed to take off because the booster nozzle had failed. These deficiencies posed an operational risk during hostilities." CAG report had said.

Firstpost investigation showed that after the CAG report, the squabbling between government defence enterprises had come to light. Eight critical snags in Akash Missile Systems were reported after the CAG report which were pending for three-seven months. CAG had recommended that Ministry of Defence needs to ensure better synchronisation of the various activities and agencies involved in such strategically important projects to ensure their timely completion and quality of Strategic Missiles also needs improvement so as to bring down failure rate.

Notwithstanding, many snags were not rectified citing lack of spares. The Air Force anguished over lackadaisical attitude of BEL and BDL has firmly directed them to resolve all internal issues immediately and ensure that no Missile is kept unserviceable due to their internal problems.
Lol congratulations............make PSUs great again
 
The article looks a bit odd.




'Akash missile system can't be trusted during war': Degraded by govt defence agencies, loopholes in strategic weapon system threaten national security - Firstpost

On 3 June, 2018, Akash Missile's Transportation and Loading Vehicle (TLV), parked at an Air Force Squadron, was jolted after a sudden burst of tube followed by shearing off wheel bolts due to impact. The incident shocked Air Force headquarters. The Air Force officials wanted not only wanted the routine analysis of the incident, but also an in-depth discussion with Defence Research and Development Laboratory (DRDL), a multi-disciplinary Missile System laboratory under the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) to unearth issues hampering the functioning of the strategic weapon system.

More than a month later, another squadron reported cracks on air intake caps of dummy missiles. An investigation by Firstpost revealed that the incidents were followed by other squadrons reporting frequent unserviceability of mobile surface-to-air Akash Missile system and long duration downtime, which means that the missiles are dysfunctional and may not be cocked and loaded against enemy in contingency. This incident forced Guided Weapon Maintenance Department of Air Force on 5 September 2018 to raise the issue, where they clearly stated that the "Squadrons have been reporting frequent unserviceability of Missiles and it has been noticed that time taken to resolve these failures is considerably high due to delay in analysis of failures."

The sheer inertia of government defence enterprise involved in Akash Missile production and maintenance reached to such an alarming level that at least three squadrons of Akash in February 2019 reported that missile system remained down or simply broken and sometimes even out of order during 90 percent of the time since their date of commissioning. These squadrons were commissioned between 2013-2015 to counter Chinese aggression.

Multiple government agencies, including Missile manufacturer Bharat Dynamics Limited (BDL) which comes under the Ministry of Defence, Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL) which is responsible for radars and maintenance and the DRDO, did not tell the truth to the government about malfunctioning Akash Missile system and poor quality of spare parts provided by the private vendors.

The malfunction of Integrated Air Compressor and Storage Facility (IACSF) revealed another shocker and the Air Force mentioned it on record that the IACSFs of Akash Missile System units are unserviceable due to wobbling and vibration, pneumatic leakage, breaking of mounting pads and bolts. A missile had failed to take off during combined guided weapon firing exercise known as 'CROSSBOW-18' and a team of Missile System Quality Assurance Agency (MSQAA), BDL and DRDL was constituted to investigate the failure.

825-akash-getty-min.jpg


If there is an emergent situation, several Akash sqaudron may not be able to launch counter offensive because deficiencies in many of the system including hydraulic oil leakage and container pressure leakage, which is pending since 2017. Getty Images

MSQAA is an independent inspection Agency under the administrative and functional control of Director General Aeronautical Quality Assurance, which comes under the Department of Defence Production of Defence Ministry. The incidents of leakage from fuel tanks and leakage in pressurised Missile containers were taken so lightly that the Air Force, responsible to secure the nation from aerial threats, was forced to direct to the DRDL, BEL and BDL that present configuration of certain systems of Akash Missile will not be acceptable for future squadrons, which are under the process of procurement. The Air Force, BDL, BEL and DRDL are yet to respond to a questionnaire sent by Firstpost on 24 November.

Details expose criminal act by government defence enterprises

If there is an emergent situation, several Akash sqaudron may not be able to launch counter offensive because deficiencies in many of the system including hydraulic oil leakage and container pressure leakage, which is pending since 2017. The complaints received from Air Force headquarters, Eastern Air Command and other Akash field units reveals there is no back-to-back agreement with vendors for equipment under warranty, making it difficult to repair the faults. Documents reviewed by Firstpost showed that almost all squadrons have expressed that they are unable to get proper feedback from BEL on repairing the faults in Missile System and on problems plaguing Akash Missiles which Indian agencies are ill-equipped to resolve. Surprisingly the field engineers, who are supposed to rectify the critical snags, are not even aware of any action plan.

Documents further said: "Currently majority of the Akash field engineers are working to pass information about issues without any tangible technical output. The untrained and poorly equipped field engineers are neither aware of any corrective action plan nor they are committed."

The documents also pointed to massive delay in supply of spares for Missile System, virtually grounding them for for six months to a year. Air Force in a meeting had informed that most of the problems reported in 2017 were pending for over a year now. The documents also pointed at the repairing of Akash trailers which are covered under annual maintenance contract. It said: "Akash Trailers serviceability is poor and some cases spares supplied to Akash Missile units are not configured as per system requirement which is affecting equipment serviceability in case of failure."

Bharat Dynamics Limited (BDL) the manufacturer of Akash Missile has not been able to resolve three important issues for the last two to three years. BDL, founded in 1970, is a government enterprise under the administrative control of the Ministry of Defence. It is learnt that BDL was told in high level meeting convened last year to come out with solid plan after conducting an investigation and study of faults in Akash Missile System within a month on long delays of critical faults. Even the investigation to unearth and address the issues was delayed.

825-akash-missile-getty.jpg


Some spares for Akash Missiles are not fit and functional and this is affecting the equipment serviceability in case of failure. Getty Images

The Air Force has refused to pay for new maintenance contract for certain Akash Missile squadrons as the old ones expired in September 2019. They argued that missile systems in several squadrons were left idle for more than a year. Instead, it had asked for extension of warranty for certain squadrons which have been dysfunctional for 17 to 15 months in the last two years. Air Force asserted since system was down and faults were neither rectified nor replaced, it violated the maintenance contract. Air Force is learnt to have said that "during the warranty period, the seller shall either replace or rectify the failed goods free of charge within 30 days of notification of such defects. As per article of the contract, warranty of the equipment would be extended by such duration from time the buyer has reported such unserviceabilities till the time seller has restored the status of the buyer's satisfaction."

Red tapeism in government defence enterprises hurt national security

Firstpost investigation also revealed gross inefficiency of government defence agencies BEL, BDL and DRDL to address the problem in Akash Missile System. Documents reveal that meetings after meetings were convened on the issues but the government defence enterprises couldn't satisfactorily answer the questions raised by Air Force. These government defence enterprises have been passing the buck. They also cheated Air Force by providing substandard and fake spares.

A meeting earlier this year chaired by Air Vice Marshal Bhanoji Rao pointed at severe negligence in handling Akash Missile System which may have serious ramifications in contingency. Documents revealed that certain spares, especially those of sub-vendors (procured by BEL) were being received at Akash Missile System units without 'Quality Assurance' certification and on a few instances it came to light that these spares were old and fake. In a letter, it was noted: "On few instances it has been noticed that the items were not new/authentic."

Air Vice Marshal Rao clearly told his team at the Air Force not to accept spares without 'Quality Assurance' certification. The meeting also revealed a lack of expertise of government-owned defence enterprises which are acting merely as a supplier of equipment after procuring it from domestic and foreign vendors. It basically means that these government enterprises are acting like a payment facilitators. Their complicity in this entire saga was further exposed when government defence enterprises officials told the senior Air Force officials that sub-vendors (private companies supplying spares) were not willing to share their design documents.

An appalled Air Vice Marshal asked, if the Defence Research and Development Laboratory (DRDL) is the authority then it must have intellectual property rights of all designs related to Akash Missile System. Obviously, the defence agencies representatives were not aware about it since they never took the pain to look into the agreements and promised the Air Force to look into the matter to ascertain whether these rights were with vendors. A promise was made to list all major vendors for unhindered supply of spares to overcome single vendor situation. As far as BEL is concerned documents said: "Almost all squadrons have expressed that they are unable to get proper feedbacks from BEL on progress and plan of action of pending faults."

The meeting chaired by Air Vice Marshal Rao also discussed high failure rate of one of the systems of Akash Missile, lacunae in analysis of faults and mismatch in software versions used for the this strategic weapon.

Another major loophole, which highlights the non-seriousness of defence agencies, is the contract with the private vendors. The agreements are more favorable to private parties putting Akash Missile System in jeopardy. Documents flagged these concerns further pointing out that all the vendor supplied items are outside their warranty obligations and in certain cases supplied spares are not configured as per system requirements. Some spares for Akash Missiles are not fit and functional and this is affecting the equipment serviceability in case of failure.

It appears that careless handling of most critical weapons has been going on for a long time. The Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) was perhaps far-sighted when in a 2017 report, the national auditor observed that Akash Missiles cannot be trusted in situation of a war. CAG had categorically stated that Akash missile system delivered by BEL were deficient in quality and 30% missiles failed the test.

"Audit found that the Strategic missile system delivered by BEL were deficient in quality. Out of 80 missiles received up to November 2014, 20 missiles were test fired during April-November 2014. Six of these missiles i.e., 30 percent, failed the test. Preliminary failure analysis report revealed that the missiles fell short of the target, had lower than the required velocity, and also there was malfunctioning of critical units like Servo Control Unit and Connector. Two missiles had failed to take off because the booster nozzle had failed. These deficiencies posed an operational risk during hostilities. Two missiles had failed to take off because the booster nozzle had failed. These deficiencies posed an operational risk during hostilities." CAG report had said.

Firstpost investigation showed that after the CAG report, the squabbling between government defence enterprises had come to light. Eight critical snags in Akash Missile Systems were reported after the CAG report which were pending for three-seven months. CAG had recommended that Ministry of Defence needs to ensure better synchronisation of the various activities and agencies involved in such strategically important projects to ensure their timely completion and quality of Strategic Missiles also needs improvement so as to bring down failure rate.

Notwithstanding, many snags were not rectified citing lack of spares. The Air Force anguished over lackadaisical attitude of BEL and BDL has firmly directed them to resolve all internal issues immediately and ensure that no Missile is kept unserviceable due to their internal problems.

The ominous article got me quite worried but reading it in entirety seems it is littered with fluff, and almost seems a hit piece.
@Ashwin, @Falcon @nair @randomradio @Parthu @Gautam @_Anonymous_



Let's look at the issues reported.
On 3 June, 2018, Akash Missile's Transportation and Loading Vehicle (TLV), parked at an Air Force Squadron, was jolted after a sudden burst of tube followed by shearing off wheel bolts due to impact.The incident shocked Air Force headquarters

So the tube referred to here is the Tire off the TLV vehicle, and the bolts for lugnuts shearing off. Anyone who knows even a bit about commercial vehicles will tell you, bolts for the lug nuts shearing off during an impact is mostly caused by over-tightening of the bolt. Remember this has actually nothing to do with the missile, it's accuracy its launch efficiency, but a transporter vehicles lug nut shearing off. And bolts shearing off shocked the Air Force HQ, not Mig21's, Mig27's, Su30's, Jag's falling from the skies like no one's business but lug bolts shearing off a Transport vehicle . To put this in context Tatra's Missile Transporter has 16 lug bolts, while Leyland Super Stallion has 10 Lug bolts and in combat duty, you can easily run the vehicle with half the Lug bolts.

The next one is also quite interesting:
More than a month later, another squadron reported cracks on air intake caps of dummy missiles.

We are talking about Air intake caps cracking. This is the red Aluminium cap cracking on a DUMMY missile btw which apparently is an operational hazard?
1575311157869.png


In the next three paragraphs, the "Investigation" of Firstpost claims unserviceability of the Deployed Akash systems, but doesn't mention the reasons for unserviceability. and then a specific issue is addressed.

The malfunction of Integrated Air Compressor and Storage Facility (IACSF) revealed another shocker and the Air Force mentioned it on record that the IACSFs of Akash Missile System units are unserviceable due to wobbling and vibration, pneumatic leakage, breaking of mounting pads and bolts.

The IACSF - Integrated Air Compressor and Storage Facility is actually a fancy term for a Tank Mounted Air compressor. That's what it is, Akash's Pneumatic system needs a compressor change and is not serviceable.

The next one
If there is an emergent situation, several Akash sqaudron may not be able to launch counter offensive because deficiencies in many of the system including hydraulic oil leakage and container pressure leakage, which is pending since 2017
A hydraulic fluid leak is not the same as losing hydraulic pressure, is the leak an Oring leaking fluid, or is the system losing hydraulic pressure, First posts "Investigation" conveniently omits the specifics of which specific hydraulics have issues. The next claim too is quite impressive, about container pressure leakage. Remember, Akash is not a hermetically sealed missile, but a rail launched missile, very much like the SA-6, the missile, propellent and the propulsion system is an all-weather system and doesn't need to be containerized at all. The only containerization is for transport from the depot to TEL, and should have zero effect on the performance for the system.


Then the article complains about BEL not providing spares, and engineers not being good enough for the forces, All the while forgetting Like HAL, IAF has outstanding dues towards both BEL and BDL, i.e. IAF wont pay for it's services but still wants to best service.

The Next allegation is serious: And heads need to roll either way is this is proved one way or the other. If true, BDL, BEL have engaged in purgery; if this is false the entities alleging such misconduct need to be taken to court.


Firstpost investigation also revealed gross inefficiency of government defence agencies BEL, BDL and DRDL to address the problem in Akash Missile System. Documents reveal that meetings after meetings were convened on the issues but the government defence enterprises couldn't satisfactorily answer the questions raised by Air Force. These government defence enterprises have been passing the buck. They also cheated Air Force by providing substandard and fake spares.

Alternate explanation and the most likely one to me is just incompetence of the Firstposts "experts" analyzing such documents.
Let's say, the known problem here in the system is the tank mounted Air compressor failing, let's say BDL decided to provide a different air compressor with different sized fittings, most likely they won't match the bill of material, and the First post just found it's scam. When clerks audit engineers, such outrageous claims usually are just lack of education, now if it really is the other way around, I hope the these PSU are made to pay concessions through their noses.



The next part of the article (to me) shows it's true intent when it reports deliberately the Akash's failure all the while completely ignoring IAF's field trials of the system.
The Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) was perhaps far-sighted when in a 2017 report, the national auditor observed that Akash Missiles cannot be trusted in situation of a war. CAG had categorically stated that Akash missile system delivered by BEL were deficient in quality and 30% missiles failed the test.

It remembers the 2017 CAG report which talks about tests from 2014 all the while forgetting the 5 consecutive successful tests in 2017 with the new seeker which was the fix for the reliability of the missile. I wonder why?

Army carries out five successful tests of Akash missiles



In all, this seems like a hit piece, with issues like Lugnuts, intake caps, Air compressors, and Gasket leaks summarized with a drizzle of CAG's spicy takes from 2014 data, across the essay to portray Akash as a useless system.

The article follows the structure,
Lug nuts, caps
Generic BEL bad unprofessional etc,
Air compressor bad
Generic BEL, BDL, Ashok Leyland, Microwave systems, BEML all chors,
Gasket leaks, Hydarulic oil leak
Generic CAG found 30% failure, We are doomed,
Airforce not happy.
Akash is shit.

So what was the Firstpost investigation exactly? I am not sure.

Whether this is a clickbait or something more sinister, I will leave up to you guys.
 
The article looks a bit odd.






The ominous article got me quite worried but reading it in entirety seems it is littered with fluff, and almost seems a hit piece.
@Ashwin, @Falcon @nair @randomradio @Parthu @Gautam @_Anonymous_



Let's look at the issues reported.


So the tube referred to here is the Tire off the TLV vehicle, and the bolts for lugnuts shearing off. Anyone who knows even a bit about commercial vehicles will tell you, bolts for the lug nuts shearing off during an impact is mostly caused by over-tightening of the bolt. Remember this has actually nothing to do with the missile, it's accuracy its launch efficiency, but a transporter vehicles lug nut shearing off. And bolts shearing off shocked the Air Force HQ, not Mig21's, Mig27's, Su30's, Jag's falling from the skies like no one's business but lug bolts shearing off a Transport vehicle . To put this in context Tatra's Missile Transporter has 16 lug bolts, while Leyland Super Stallion has 10 Lug bolts and in combat duty, you can easily run the vehicle with half the Lug bolts.

The next one is also quite interesting:


We are talking about Air intake caps cracking. This is the red Aluminium cap cracking on a DUMMY missile btw which apparently is an operational hazard?
View attachment 11763

In the next three paragraphs, the "Investigation" of Firstpost claims unserviceability of the Deployed Akash systems, but doesn't mention the reasons for unserviceability. and then a specific issue is addressed.



The IACSF - Integrated Air Compressor and Storage Facility is actually a fancy term for a Tank Mounted Air compressor. That's what it is, Akash's Pneumatic system needs a compressor change and is not serviceable.

The next one

A hydraulic fluid leak is not the same as losing hydraulic pressure, is the leak an Oring leaking fluid, or is the system losing hydraulic pressure, First posts "Investigation" conveniently omits the specifics of which specific hydraulics have issues. The next claim too is quite impressive, about container pressure leakage. Remember, Akash is not a hermetically sealed missile, but a rail launched missile, very much like the SA-6, the missile, propellent and the propulsion system is an all-weather system and doesn't need to be containerized at all. The only containerization is for transport from the depot to TEL, and should have zero effect on the performance for the system.


Then the article complains about BEL not providing spares, and engineers not being good enough for the forces, All the while forgetting Like HAL, IAF has outstanding dues towards both BEL and BDL, i.e. IAF wont pay for it's services but still wants to best service.

The Next allegation is serious: And heads need to roll either way is this is proved one way or the other. If true, BDL, BEL have engaged in purgery; if this is false the entities alleging such misconduct need to be taken to court.



Alternate explanation and the most likely one to me is just incompetence of the Firstposts "experts" analyzing such documents.
Let's say, the known problem here in the system is the tank mounted Air compressor failing, let's say BDL decided to provide a different air compressor with different sized fittings, most likely they won't match the bill of material, and the First post just found it's scam. When clerks audit engineers, such outrageous claims usually are just lack of education, now if it really is the other way around, I hope the these PSU are made to pay concessions through their noses.



The next part of the article (to me) shows it's true intent when it reports deliberately the Akash's failure all the while completely ignoring IAF's field trials of the system.


It remembers the 2017 CAG report which talks about tests from 2014 all the while forgetting the 5 consecutive successful tests in 2017 with the new seeker which was the fix for the reliability of the missile. I wonder why?

Army carries out five successful tests of Akash missiles



In all, this seems like a hit piece, with issues like Lugnuts, intake caps, Air compressors, and Gasket leaks summarized with a drizzle of CAG's spicy takes from 2014 data, across the essay to portray Akash as a useless system.

The article follows the structure,
Lug nuts, caps
Generic BEL bad unprofessional etc,
Air compressor bad
Generic BEL, BDL, Ashok Leyland, Microwave systems, BEML all chors,
Gasket leaks, Hydarulic oil leak
Generic CAG found 30% failure, We are doomed,
Airforce not happy.
Akash is shit.


So what was the Firstpost investigation exactly? I am not sure.

Whether this is a clickbait or something more sinister, I will leave up to you guys.
Utterly Brilliant! I think you ought to post this under Strat post and tag the usual suspects. There is a lot of misinformation upon Twitter . If knowledgeable guys like you don't take a stand, we'd have a run of half baked zero knowledge and conjecture a la third class so called sophisticated public intellectuals who in reality are trolls like Sonali Ranade doing the rounds. There's definitely an agenda here.
 
The article looks a bit odd.






The ominous article got me quite worried but reading it in entirety seems it is littered with fluff, and almost seems a hit piece.
@Ashwin, @Falcon @nair @randomradio @Parthu @Gautam @_Anonymous_



Let's look at the issues reported.


So the tube referred to here is the Tire off the TLV vehicle, and the bolts for lugnuts shearing off. Anyone who knows even a bit about commercial vehicles will tell you, bolts for the lug nuts shearing off during an impact is mostly caused by over-tightening of the bolt. Remember this has actually nothing to do with the missile, it's accuracy its launch efficiency, but a transporter vehicles lug nut shearing off. And bolts shearing off shocked the Air Force HQ, not Mig21's, Mig27's, Su30's, Jag's falling from the skies like no one's business but lug bolts shearing off a Transport vehicle . To put this in context Tatra's Missile Transporter has 16 lug bolts, while Leyland Super Stallion has 10 Lug bolts and in combat duty, you can easily run the vehicle with half the Lug bolts.

The next one is also quite interesting:


We are talking about Air intake caps cracking. This is the red Aluminium cap cracking on a DUMMY missile btw which apparently is an operational hazard?
View attachment 11763

In the next three paragraphs, the "Investigation" of Firstpost claims unserviceability of the Deployed Akash systems, but doesn't mention the reasons for unserviceability. and then a specific issue is addressed.



The IACSF - Integrated Air Compressor and Storage Facility is actually a fancy term for a Tank Mounted Air compressor. That's what it is, Akash's Pneumatic system needs a compressor change and is not serviceable.

The next one

A hydraulic fluid leak is not the same as losing hydraulic pressure, is the leak an Oring leaking fluid, or is the system losing hydraulic pressure, First posts "Investigation" conveniently omits the specifics of which specific hydraulics have issues. The next claim too is quite impressive, about container pressure leakage. Remember, Akash is not a hermetically sealed missile, but a rail launched missile, very much like the SA-6, the missile, propellent and the propulsion system is an all-weather system and doesn't need to be containerized at all. The only containerization is for transport from the depot to TEL, and should have zero effect on the performance for the system.


Then the article complains about BEL not providing spares, and engineers not being good enough for the forces, All the while forgetting Like HAL, IAF has outstanding dues towards both BEL and BDL, i.e. IAF wont pay for it's services but still wants to best service.

The Next allegation is serious: And heads need to roll either way is this is proved one way or the other. If true, BDL, BEL have engaged in purgery; if this is false the entities alleging such misconduct need to be taken to court.



Alternate explanation and the most likely one to me is just incompetence of the Firstposts "experts" analyzing such documents.
Let's say, the known problem here in the system is the tank mounted Air compressor failing, let's say BDL decided to provide a different air compressor with different sized fittings, most likely they won't match the bill of material, and the First post just found it's scam. When clerks audit engineers, such outrageous claims usually are just lack of education, now if it really is the other way around, I hope the these PSU are made to pay concessions through their noses.



The next part of the article (to me) shows it's true intent when it reports deliberately the Akash's failure all the while completely ignoring IAF's field trials of the system.


It remembers the 2017 CAG report which talks about tests from 2014 all the while forgetting the 5 consecutive successful tests in 2017 with the new seeker which was the fix for the reliability of the missile. I wonder why?

Army carries out five successful tests of Akash missiles



In all, this seems like a hit piece, with issues like Lugnuts, intake caps, Air compressors, and Gasket leaks summarized with a drizzle of CAG's spicy takes from 2014 data, across the essay to portray Akash as a useless system.

The article follows the structure,
Lug nuts, caps
Generic BEL bad unprofessional etc,
Air compressor bad
Generic BEL, BDL, Ashok Leyland, Microwave systems, BEML all chors,
Gasket leaks, Hydarulic oil leak
Generic CAG found 30% failure, We are doomed,
Airforce not happy.
Akash is shit.


So what was the Firstpost investigation exactly? I am not sure.

Whether this is a clickbait or something more sinister, I will leave up to you guys.

Yeh toh CIA-ISI-Mossad ki saazish hai.

Remember the recent hit piece on DRDO's MPATGM program a few days ago? The Israelis want to sell more SPYDER SAMs to both IAF and IA, but Akash has put a dampner on their plan.

On a serious note, if Akash had major problems, IAF wouldn't be ordering more squadrons and IA wouldn't be ordering 2 new regiments. Case closed.
 
The article looks a bit odd.






The ominous article got me quite worried but reading it in entirety seems it is littered with fluff, and almost seems a hit piece.
@Ashwin, @Falcon @nair @randomradio @Parthu @Gautam @_Anonymous_



Let's look at the issues reported.


So the tube referred to here is the Tire off the TLV vehicle, and the bolts for lugnuts shearing off. Anyone who knows even a bit about commercial vehicles will tell you, bolts for the lug nuts shearing off during an impact is mostly caused by over-tightening of the bolt. Remember this has actually nothing to do with the missile, it's accuracy its launch efficiency, but a transporter vehicles lug nut shearing off. And bolts shearing off shocked the Air Force HQ, not Mig21's, Mig27's, Su30's, Jag's falling from the skies like no one's business but lug bolts shearing off a Transport vehicle . To put this in context Tatra's Missile Transporter has 16 lug bolts, while Leyland Super Stallion has 10 Lug bolts and in combat duty, you can easily run the vehicle with half the Lug bolts.

The next one is also quite interesting:


We are talking about Air intake caps cracking. This is the red Aluminium cap cracking on a DUMMY missile btw which apparently is an operational hazard?
View attachment 11763

In the next three paragraphs, the "Investigation" of Firstpost claims unserviceability of the Deployed Akash systems, but doesn't mention the reasons for unserviceability. and then a specific issue is addressed.



The IACSF - Integrated Air Compressor and Storage Facility is actually a fancy term for a Tank Mounted Air compressor. That's what it is, Akash's Pneumatic system needs a compressor change and is not serviceable.

The next one

A hydraulic fluid leak is not the same as losing hydraulic pressure, is the leak an Oring leaking fluid, or is the system losing hydraulic pressure, First posts "Investigation" conveniently omits the specifics of which specific hydraulics have issues. The next claim too is quite impressive, about container pressure leakage. Remember, Akash is not a hermetically sealed missile, but a rail launched missile, very much like the SA-6, the missile, propellent and the propulsion system is an all-weather system and doesn't need to be containerized at all. The only containerization is for transport from the depot to TEL, and should have zero effect on the performance for the system.


Then the article complains about BEL not providing spares, and engineers not being good enough for the forces, All the while forgetting Like HAL, IAF has outstanding dues towards both BEL and BDL, i.e. IAF wont pay for it's services but still wants to best service.

The Next allegation is serious: And heads need to roll either way is this is proved one way or the other. If true, BDL, BEL have engaged in purgery; if this is false the entities alleging such misconduct need to be taken to court.



Alternate explanation and the most likely one to me is just incompetence of the Firstposts "experts" analyzing such documents.
Let's say, the known problem here in the system is the tank mounted Air compressor failing, let's say BDL decided to provide a different air compressor with different sized fittings, most likely they won't match the bill of material, and the First post just found it's scam. When clerks audit engineers, such outrageous claims usually are just lack of education, now if it really is the other way around, I hope the these PSU are made to pay concessions through their noses.



The next part of the article (to me) shows it's true intent when it reports deliberately the Akash's failure all the while completely ignoring IAF's field trials of the system.


It remembers the 2017 CAG report which talks about tests from 2014 all the while forgetting the 5 consecutive successful tests in 2017 with the new seeker which was the fix for the reliability of the missile. I wonder why?

Army carries out five successful tests of Akash missiles



In all, this seems like a hit piece, with issues like Lugnuts, intake caps, Air compressors, and Gasket leaks summarized with a drizzle of CAG's spicy takes from 2014 data, across the essay to portray Akash as a useless system.

The article follows the structure,
Lug nuts, caps
Generic BEL bad unprofessional etc,
Air compressor bad
Generic BEL, BDL, Ashok Leyland, Microwave systems, BEML all chors,
Gasket leaks, Hydarulic oil leak
Generic CAG found 30% failure, We are doomed,
Airforce not happy.
Akash is shit.


So what was the Firstpost investigation exactly? I am not sure.

Whether this is a clickbait or something more sinister, I will leave up to you guys.
You hit the nail on the head....☺☺
 
The article looks a bit odd.






The ominous article got me quite worried but reading it in entirety seems it is littered with fluff, and almost seems a hit piece.
@Ashwin, @Falcon @nair @randomradio @Parthu @Gautam @_Anonymous_



Let's look at the issues reported.


So the tube referred to here is the Tire off the TLV vehicle, and the bolts for lugnuts shearing off. Anyone who knows even a bit about commercial vehicles will tell you, bolts for the lug nuts shearing off during an impact is mostly caused by over-tightening of the bolt. Remember this has actually nothing to do with the missile, it's accuracy its launch efficiency, but a transporter vehicles lug nut shearing off. And bolts shearing off shocked the Air Force HQ, not Mig21's, Mig27's, Su30's, Jag's falling from the skies like no one's business but lug bolts shearing off a Transport vehicle . To put this in context Tatra's Missile Transporter has 16 lug bolts, while Leyland Super Stallion has 10 Lug bolts and in combat duty, you can easily run the vehicle with half the Lug bolts.

The next one is also quite interesting:


We are talking about Air intake caps cracking. This is the red Aluminium cap cracking on a DUMMY missile btw which apparently is an operational hazard?
View attachment 11763

In the next three paragraphs, the "Investigation" of Firstpost claims unserviceability of the Deployed Akash systems, but doesn't mention the reasons for unserviceability. and then a specific issue is addressed.



The IACSF - Integrated Air Compressor and Storage Facility is actually a fancy term for a Tank Mounted Air compressor. That's what it is, Akash's Pneumatic system needs a compressor change and is not serviceable.

The next one

A hydraulic fluid leak is not the same as losing hydraulic pressure, is the leak an Oring leaking fluid, or is the system losing hydraulic pressure, First posts "Investigation" conveniently omits the specifics of which specific hydraulics have issues. The next claim too is quite impressive, about container pressure leakage. Remember, Akash is not a hermetically sealed missile, but a rail launched missile, very much like the SA-6, the missile, propellent and the propulsion system is an all-weather system and doesn't need to be containerized at all. The only containerization is for transport from the depot to TEL, and should have zero effect on the performance for the system.


Then the article complains about BEL not providing spares, and engineers not being good enough for the forces, All the while forgetting Like HAL, IAF has outstanding dues towards both BEL and BDL, i.e. IAF wont pay for it's services but still wants to best service.

The Next allegation is serious: And heads need to roll either way is this is proved one way or the other. If true, BDL, BEL have engaged in purgery; if this is false the entities alleging such misconduct need to be taken to court.



Alternate explanation and the most likely one to me is just incompetence of the Firstposts "experts" analyzing such documents.
Let's say, the known problem here in the system is the tank mounted Air compressor failing, let's say BDL decided to provide a different air compressor with different sized fittings, most likely they won't match the bill of material, and the First post just found it's scam. When clerks audit engineers, such outrageous claims usually are just lack of education, now if it really is the other way around, I hope the these PSU are made to pay concessions through their noses.



The next part of the article (to me) shows it's true intent when it reports deliberately the Akash's failure all the while completely ignoring IAF's field trials of the system.


It remembers the 2017 CAG report which talks about tests from 2014 all the while forgetting the 5 consecutive successful tests in 2017 with the new seeker which was the fix for the reliability of the missile. I wonder why?

Army carries out five successful tests of Akash missiles



In all, this seems like a hit piece, with issues like Lugnuts, intake caps, Air compressors, and Gasket leaks summarized with a drizzle of CAG's spicy takes from 2014 data, across the essay to portray Akash as a useless system.

The article follows the structure,
Lug nuts, caps
Generic BEL bad unprofessional etc,
Air compressor bad
Generic BEL, BDL, Ashok Leyland, Microwave systems, BEML all chors,
Gasket leaks, Hydarulic oil leak
Generic CAG found 30% failure, We are doomed,
Airforce not happy.
Akash is shit.


So what was the Firstpost investigation exactly? I am not sure.

Whether this is a clickbait or something more sinister, I will leave up to you guys.
Excellent write up. Thank you for this. I think @_Anonymous_ is right, @Ashwin @nair please consider taking this to twitter, I've seen a lot of pseudo-experts touting their expertise on twitter yesterday.
 
The article looks a bit odd.






The ominous article got me quite worried but reading it in entirety seems it is littered with fluff, and almost seems a hit piece.
@Ashwin, @Falcon @nair @randomradio @Parthu @Gautam @_Anonymous_



Let's look at the issues reported.


So the tube referred to here is the Tire off the TLV vehicle, and the bolts for lugnuts shearing off. Anyone who knows even a bit about commercial vehicles will tell you, bolts for the lug nuts shearing off during an impact is mostly caused by over-tightening of the bolt. Remember this has actually nothing to do with the missile, it's accuracy its launch efficiency, but a transporter vehicles lug nut shearing off. And bolts shearing off shocked the Air Force HQ, not Mig21's, Mig27's, Su30's, Jag's falling from the skies like no one's business but lug bolts shearing off a Transport vehicle . To put this in context Tatra's Missile Transporter has 16 lug bolts, while Leyland Super Stallion has 10 Lug bolts and in combat duty, you can easily run the vehicle with half the Lug bolts.

The next one is also quite interesting:


We are talking about Air intake caps cracking. This is the red Aluminium cap cracking on a DUMMY missile btw which apparently is an operational hazard?
View attachment 11763

In the next three paragraphs, the "Investigation" of Firstpost claims unserviceability of the Deployed Akash systems, but doesn't mention the reasons for unserviceability. and then a specific issue is addressed.



The IACSF - Integrated Air Compressor and Storage Facility is actually a fancy term for a Tank Mounted Air compressor. That's what it is, Akash's Pneumatic system needs a compressor change and is not serviceable.

The next one

A hydraulic fluid leak is not the same as losing hydraulic pressure, is the leak an Oring leaking fluid, or is the system losing hydraulic pressure, First posts "Investigation" conveniently omits the specifics of which specific hydraulics have issues. The next claim too is quite impressive, about container pressure leakage. Remember, Akash is not a hermetically sealed missile, but a rail launched missile, very much like the SA-6, the missile, propellent and the propulsion system is an all-weather system and doesn't need to be containerized at all. The only containerization is for transport from the depot to TEL, and should have zero effect on the performance for the system.


Then the article complains about BEL not providing spares, and engineers not being good enough for the forces, All the while forgetting Like HAL, IAF has outstanding dues towards both BEL and BDL, i.e. IAF wont pay for it's services but still wants to best service.

The Next allegation is serious: And heads need to roll either way is this is proved one way or the other. If true, BDL, BEL have engaged in purgery; if this is false the entities alleging such misconduct need to be taken to court.



Alternate explanation and the most likely one to me is just incompetence of the Firstposts "experts" analyzing such documents.
Let's say, the known problem here in the system is the tank mounted Air compressor failing, let's say BDL decided to provide a different air compressor with different sized fittings, most likely they won't match the bill of material, and the First post just found it's scam. When clerks audit engineers, such outrageous claims usually are just lack of education, now if it really is the other way around, I hope the these PSU are made to pay concessions through their noses.



The next part of the article (to me) shows it's true intent when it reports deliberately the Akash's failure all the while completely ignoring IAF's field trials of the system.


It remembers the 2017 CAG report which talks about tests from 2014 all the while forgetting the 5 consecutive successful tests in 2017 with the new seeker which was the fix for the reliability of the missile. I wonder why?

Army carries out five successful tests of Akash missiles



In all, this seems like a hit piece, with issues like Lugnuts, intake caps, Air compressors, and Gasket leaks summarized with a drizzle of CAG's spicy takes from 2014 data, across the essay to portray Akash as a useless system.

The article follows the structure,
Lug nuts, caps
Generic BEL bad unprofessional etc,
Air compressor bad
Generic BEL, BDL, Ashok Leyland, Microwave systems, BEML all chors,
Gasket leaks, Hydarulic oil leak
Generic CAG found 30% failure, We are doomed,
Airforce not happy.
Akash is shit.


So what was the Firstpost investigation exactly? I am not sure.

Whether this is a clickbait or something more sinister, I will leave up to you guys.
BTW and findings released of Mirage upgrade or it will also be kept hidden in vast storage of HAL for ensuring "national security"? Was it suicide by IAF pilots as per HAL? We have heard nothing on that front as well except dead silence and anyone questioning the government PSUs will be termed anti-national, anti-state, fasaadi and what not? Thank you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deathstar
BTW and findings released of Mirage upgrade or it will also be kept hidden in vast storage of HAL for ensuring "national security"? Was it suicide by IAF pilots as per HAL? We have heard nothing on that front as well except dead silence and anyone questioning the government PSUs will be termed anti-national, anti-state, fasaadi and what not? Thank you.
*Upgraded Mirage incident
 
The article looks a bit odd.






The ominous article got me quite worried but reading it in entirety seems it is littered with fluff, and almost seems a hit piece.
@Ashwin, @Falcon @nair @randomradio @Parthu @Gautam @_Anonymous_



Let's look at the issues reported.


So the tube referred to here is the Tire off the TLV vehicle, and the bolts for lugnuts shearing off. Anyone who knows even a bit about commercial vehicles will tell you, bolts for the lug nuts shearing off during an impact is mostly caused by over-tightening of the bolt. Remember this has actually nothing to do with the missile, it's accuracy its launch efficiency, but a transporter vehicles lug nut shearing off. And bolts shearing off shocked the Air Force HQ, not Mig21's, Mig27's, Su30's, Jag's falling from the skies like no one's business but lug bolts shearing off a Transport vehicle . To put this in context Tatra's Missile Transporter has 16 lug bolts, while Leyland Super Stallion has 10 Lug bolts and in combat duty, you can easily run the vehicle with half the Lug bolts.

The next one is also quite interesting:


We are talking about Air intake caps cracking. This is the red Aluminium cap cracking on a DUMMY missile btw which apparently is an operational hazard?
View attachment 11763

In the next three paragraphs, the "Investigation" of Firstpost claims unserviceability of the Deployed Akash systems, but doesn't mention the reasons for unserviceability. and then a specific issue is addressed.



The IACSF - Integrated Air Compressor and Storage Facility is actually a fancy term for a Tank Mounted Air compressor. That's what it is, Akash's Pneumatic system needs a compressor change and is not serviceable.

The next one

A hydraulic fluid leak is not the same as losing hydraulic pressure, is the leak an Oring leaking fluid, or is the system losing hydraulic pressure, First posts "Investigation" conveniently omits the specifics of which specific hydraulics have issues. The next claim too is quite impressive, about container pressure leakage. Remember, Akash is not a hermetically sealed missile, but a rail launched missile, very much like the SA-6, the missile, propellent and the propulsion system is an all-weather system and doesn't need to be containerized at all. The only containerization is for transport from the depot to TEL, and should have zero effect on the performance for the system.


Then the article complains about BEL not providing spares, and engineers not being good enough for the forces, All the while forgetting Like HAL, IAF has outstanding dues towards both BEL and BDL, i.e. IAF wont pay for it's services but still wants to best service.

The Next allegation is serious: And heads need to roll either way is this is proved one way or the other. If true, BDL, BEL have engaged in purgery; if this is false the entities alleging such misconduct need to be taken to court.



Alternate explanation and the most likely one to me is just incompetence of the Firstposts "experts" analyzing such documents.
Let's say, the known problem here in the system is the tank mounted Air compressor failing, let's say BDL decided to provide a different air compressor with different sized fittings, most likely they won't match the bill of material, and the First post just found it's scam. When clerks audit engineers, such outrageous claims usually are just lack of education, now if it really is the other way around, I hope the these PSU are made to pay concessions through their noses.



The next part of the article (to me) shows it's true intent when it reports deliberately the Akash's failure all the while completely ignoring IAF's field trials of the system.


It remembers the 2017 CAG report which talks about tests from 2014 all the while forgetting the 5 consecutive successful tests in 2017 with the new seeker which was the fix for the reliability of the missile. I wonder why?

Army carries out five successful tests of Akash missiles



In all, this seems like a hit piece, with issues like Lugnuts, intake caps, Air compressors, and Gasket leaks summarized with a drizzle of CAG's spicy takes from 2014 data, across the essay to portray Akash as a useless system.

The article follows the structure,
Lug nuts, caps
Generic BEL bad unprofessional etc,
Air compressor bad
Generic BEL, BDL, Ashok Leyland, Microwave systems, BEML all chors,
Gasket leaks, Hydarulic oil leak
Generic CAG found 30% failure, We are doomed,
Airforce not happy.
Akash is shit.


So what was the Firstpost investigation exactly? I am not sure.

Whether this is a clickbait or something more sinister, I will leave up to you guys.


Saurav Jha (@SJha1618) Tweeted:
As the military spending squeeze happens, and the system is forced to induct indigenous weapons in greater numbers, expect more hit jobs, complaints, 'exclusive investigations', foreign OEM rants, 'phorces need better' & our 'security is in jeopardy' claims to surface. ( )



Lt Gen H S Panag(R) (@rwac48) Tweeted:
'Akash missile system can't be trusted during war': Degraded by govt defence agencies, loopholes in strategic weapon system threaten national security - Firstpost 'Akash missile system can't be trusted during war': Degraded by govt defence agencies, loopholes in strategic weapon system threaten national security - Firstpost ( )


harinder (@harinde58988937) Tweeted:
@rwac48 @ParaRjs If AK rifle,a basic infantry weapon can only be made under licence then to think of making anti aircraft missile on our own is very tall order ( )
Pravin Sawhney (@PravinSawhney) Tweeted:
@harinde58988937 @rwac48 @ParaRjs It was not made on our own - would not like to add more 😊 ( )


See what I mean? @Milspec ; @Ashwin ; @nair ; @Falcon ; @Gautam
 
Last edited:
Firestarter (@Firezstarter1) Tweeted:
Akash serviceability issue reported on Firstpost. Linking it reduces twtr wrd count so salient facts.
+ No key perform/design issues with msl system, hence successful performance in back2back trials from 2014 onwards
- Usual vendor/SC management issues by DPSU complex ( )

Do read the entire thread. Highlights points raised by @Milspec
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sulla84
On a serious note, if Akash had major problems, IAF wouldn't be ordering more squadrons and IA wouldn't be ordering 2 new regiments. Case closed.


No. More SPYDER units are coming in, MRSAM is also being inducted. Akash is not a threat .

Akash is for static locations & has certain issues arising out of QA & QC. That remains a cause for concern.

Whole squadrons dysfunctional... hyperbole or truth ?
Nonsense.

*Upgraded Mirage incident


Best not told about here. Both ... HAL & Pilots concerned were at fault. Won't comment beyond this.

BTW and findings released of Mirage upgrade or it will also be kept hidden in vast storage of HAL for ensuring "national security"? Was it suicide by IAF pilots as per HAL? We have heard nothing on that front as well except dead silence and anyone questioning the government PSUs will be termed anti-national, anti-state, fasaadi and what not? Thank you.


Am against all DPSUs and demand their dismantling & ending of a monopolistic market
 
The article looks a bit odd.






The ominous article got me quite worried but reading it in entirety seems it is littered with fluff, and almost seems a hit piece.
@Ashwin, @Falcon @nair @randomradio @Parthu @Gautam @_Anonymous_



Let's look at the issues reported.


So the tube referred to here is the Tire off the TLV vehicle, and the bolts for lugnuts shearing off. Anyone who knows even a bit about commercial vehicles will tell you, bolts for the lug nuts shearing off during an impact is mostly caused by over-tightening of the bolt. Remember this has actually nothing to do with the missile, it's accuracy its launch efficiency, but a transporter vehicles lug nut shearing off. And bolts shearing off shocked the Air Force HQ, not Mig21's, Mig27's, Su30's, Jag's falling from the skies like no one's business but lug bolts shearing off a Transport vehicle . To put this in context Tatra's Missile Transporter has 16 lug bolts, while Leyland Super Stallion has 10 Lug bolts and in combat duty, you can easily run the vehicle with half the Lug bolts.

The next one is also quite interesting:


We are talking about Air intake caps cracking. This is the red Aluminium cap cracking on a DUMMY missile btw which apparently is an operational hazard?
View attachment 11763

In the next three paragraphs, the "Investigation" of Firstpost claims unserviceability of the Deployed Akash systems, but doesn't mention the reasons for unserviceability. and then a specific issue is addressed.



The IACSF - Integrated Air Compressor and Storage Facility is actually a fancy term for a Tank Mounted Air compressor. That's what it is, Akash's Pneumatic system needs a compressor change and is not serviceable.

The next one

A hydraulic fluid leak is not the same as losing hydraulic pressure, is the leak an Oring leaking fluid, or is the system losing hydraulic pressure, First posts "Investigation" conveniently omits the specifics of which specific hydraulics have issues. The next claim too is quite impressive, about container pressure leakage. Remember, Akash is not a hermetically sealed missile, but a rail launched missile, very much like the SA-6, the missile, propellent and the propulsion system is an all-weather system and doesn't need to be containerized at all. The only containerization is for transport from the depot to TEL, and should have zero effect on the performance for the system.


Then the article complains about BEL not providing spares, and engineers not being good enough for the forces, All the while forgetting Like HAL, IAF has outstanding dues towards both BEL and BDL, i.e. IAF wont pay for it's services but still wants to best service.

The Next allegation is serious: And heads need to roll either way is this is proved one way or the other. If true, BDL, BEL have engaged in purgery; if this is false the entities alleging such misconduct need to be taken to court.



Alternate explanation and the most likely one to me is just incompetence of the Firstposts "experts" analyzing such documents.
Let's say, the known problem here in the system is the tank mounted Air compressor failing, let's say BDL decided to provide a different air compressor with different sized fittings, most likely they won't match the bill of material, and the First post just found it's scam. When clerks audit engineers, such outrageous claims usually are just lack of education, now if it really is the other way around, I hope the these PSU are made to pay concessions through their noses.



The next part of the article (to me) shows it's true intent when it reports deliberately the Akash's failure all the while completely ignoring IAF's field trials of the system.


It remembers the 2017 CAG report which talks about tests from 2014 all the while forgetting the 5 consecutive successful tests in 2017 with the new seeker which was the fix for the reliability of the missile. I wonder why?

Army carries out five successful tests of Akash missiles



In all, this seems like a hit piece, with issues like Lugnuts, intake caps, Air compressors, and Gasket leaks summarized with a drizzle of CAG's spicy takes from 2014 data, across the essay to portray Akash as a useless system.

The article follows the structure,
Lug nuts, caps
Generic BEL bad unprofessional etc,
Air compressor bad
Generic BEL, BDL, Ashok Leyland, Microwave systems, BEML all chors,
Gasket leaks, Hydarulic oil leak
Generic CAG found 30% failure, We are doomed,
Airforce not happy.
Akash is shit.


So what was the Firstpost investigation exactly? I am not sure.

Whether this is a clickbait or something more sinister, I will leave up to you guys.


Servicability is okay, but support and QA/QC issues are there. We have seen it in the Agni-3 test lately. Akash firing has been by and large good enough.

The problem has a similar pattern as that of ALH - poor QA/QC with poor service support. When I say QA/QC it is both of production and the spares that are provided. We lost customers of INSAS in Nepal and Oman, we lost ALH from poor services in Ecuador. Fortunately for the DPSUs, the Indian Forces have no choice but to pay the price that is exacted from the poor production practices of DPSUs in terms of lives lost/costs incurred.

All the best.
 
Servicability is okay, but support and QA/QC issues are there. We have seen it in the Agni-3 test lately. Akash firing has been by and large good enough.

The problem has a similar pattern as that of ALH - poor QA/QC with poor service support. When I say QA/QC it is both of production and the spares that are provided. We lost customers of INSAS in Nepal and Oman, we lost ALH from poor services in Ecuador. Fortunately for the DPSUs, the Indian Forces have no choice but to pay the price that is exacted from the poor production practices of DPSUs in terms of lives lost/costs incurred.

All the best.

Ain't that the responsibility of the end user to bring down the baton ?

Why not include ironclad compensation clause while signing the deals ?

And importantly why not invoke the compensation clauses with an iron hand when the need be.

As as i am concerned the military is half responsible , they do these deals one foot in and other foot out .

I know what was the problem in Ecuador , they didn't take the additional maintenance package which the hal insisted on repeatedly , the Ecuadorians wanted to save money and they paid the price for it.

Except for the first crash which was pilot error , all other crashes happened after the obligatory maintenance warrenty period of hal expired.

So who is to be blamed ?

Also if indian PSUs etc are to be blamed so is the Indian military , navy the least . Army and airforce are at no better levels of competence.

The rot which we Indians blame each other is prevelent in all institutions at the the top levels.

Unless the respective institutions introspect their own deficiencies nobody will come out of this quagmire.

Anyways
No offense but when i see a T90 modified with a chair and canopy so that a general can sit on top during exercise , it gives me the impression of cronyism. A general worth his salt would ride a tank same as his men
 
Last edited:
The reason for the hit job cannot be more clear :

Indian Air Force to get deadly Akash missiles! Places order for 7 squadrons of Made-in-India missile system

By: Huma Siddiqui | New Delhi | Published: December 3, 2019 6:29:18 PM

The Missile System which has been designed and developed by the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) and produced and commissioned by Bharat Dynamics Limited (BDL), Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL) has been performing well in integrated Air Defence (AD) exercises conducted from time to time by IAF.
missile-1.jpg

Dismissing reports in a section of the media about the systems which are supporting ground system, sources said that “maintenance is not carried out by DRDO but the Defence PSUs.(PTI)

Satisfied by the consistent and reliable performance by the indigenous Akash Missile System, Surface to Air Missile (SAM) an additional order for seven more squadrons have been placed by the Indian Air Force recently. This is by far the highest order placed by the service for the Akash Missile System.

The Missile System which has been designed and developed by the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) and produced and commissioned by Bharat Dynamics Limited (BDL), Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL) has been performing well in integrated Air Defence (AD) exercises conducted from time to time by IAF.

The number of missiles fired in Ex- Vayu Shakti 2019 or Crossbow-18, the Akash Missile System had successfully intercepted and destroyed unmanned aerial targets.

In Ex Crossbow-18 the indigenous Akash Missile System was fielded along with imported SAM weapon system under integrated Air defence operations and it surpassed all expectations. The made in India Akash Weapon System has proved its performance capability and reliability which has been successfully demonstrated by the IAF.

There were some teething problems related to extensive field usage faced by squadrons based in the North East and after several rounds of meetings between the user, DRDO and the defence PSUs BDL and BEL and other agencies involved, a mechanism has been evolved to carry out the maintenance together. However, due to the inclement weather in North East, there have been delays in carrying out the repairs.

To a question about serviceability and maintainability of the system, a former IAF officer explained “The BDL/BEL are Defence PSUs and are responsible for the maintainability of the system. There is no design issue with the system which has been designed and developed by DRDO.” And, “a proper ecosystem has been evolved between the user –IAF, DRDO, BEL/BDL from development to commissioning.”

In case of any faults, proper investigations are carried out by DRDO and issues resolved with the joint efforts of the user IAF, BEL/BDL, and other agencies which also included design change.

Sources said that prototypes were made and tested in one equipment and after successful testing and clearance by Quality Assurance (QA), produced in the required quantity and retrofitted in equipment in unit locations. The Missile system comes with combat ground systems which are directly responsible for engaging the threat and supporting ground systems to facilitate the readiness of the combat systems.

Dismissing reports in a section of the media about the systems which are supporting ground system, sources said that “maintenance is not carried out by DRDO but the Defence PSUs. However, design solutions towards the main combat systems are given high priority and addressing the issues related to the other supporting ground system was taken simultaneously.”

Indian Air Force to get deadly Akash missiles! Places order for 7 squadrons of Made-in-India missile system