Scramjet one is entirely different case, you have to develop suitable materials, coating technique, precision valve systems, combustor, working communication system, hydrocarbon fuel, guidance and control systems and finally prove the same over flight trial missions. So a lot of stuff that are to be used would be first time developed application specific, aka very less volumetric demand initially. So the cost is obviously very high.
But if we just consider the supersonic usage, there is enough scope for cost to go down, and being more effective than any subsonic counterpart. Rest depends on use tactics. Once multiple working ramjet variants are available and tech base expand, from single solid rocket motor to dual pulse motors in use now, to multi pulse, to LFRJ based tactical applications, to SFDR based tactical applications, to general hypersonic glide body applications, there are many scope available to a mission planner should all the options are available besides the subsonic lacm and LORA like theater bm.
As we know, there are definite plans for tactical usage once the core tech is mature. We have already seen it with strategic systems,
View attachment 35541