Positive news. Would be interesting to know the lander is tilted at what angle. If its is tilted and not prone, then potentially ramp can be deployed if we re-establish communication and deploy Pragyaan. Fingers crossed really. ...
There may not be any, Lander is 2.54m x 2m and Camera on Orbiter is .32m resolution (same as google earth). So the image of lander will be around 8 pixel by 6 pixel, too small to analyze anything.
They may have used different different images and shadows and model it in CAD to actually identify the orientation of lander. You can't get anything conclusive with naked eye so not much use to put those images in public.
And since it landed on far side of the moon we don't have direct line of sight to get something via powerful telescopes.
But how? Unless there is communication nothing can be done. Strange that this was not taken into account and lander was not pre programmed to contain such situations! Or maybe it was and it is broken and can't function anymore.
Also design was pretty conventional and risk prone with more and more designs that eliminate risk of orientation and terrain are available I don't know why we went for very basic and traditional one.
Ha! You don't know anything. We should use Fawad Chaudhry's idea of using the Hubble telescope to see the moon. Even the rivets will become visible in HD.
But would SUPARCO allow us to use their Hubble telescope during such tensions??i doubt itHa! You don't know anything. We should use Fawad Chaudhry's idea of using the Hubble telescope to see the moon. Even the rivets will become visible in HD.
He is busy getting his vision and thought process checked. He sees every Pizza boy , Doctor , Patient , Plumber , Taxi driver as victim of evil yindoos
Infrared image plus whatever you said
and tried to reflect the laser off the laser reflector installed on it. There was no reflection so it's tilted.
It has crash landed. Things don't get deformed like that on lunar surface due to elastic collision
It recovered very much in last seconds, that's why not much of hard landing, though telemetry didn't show that due to cut-off of communication.
actually there is sight hope...they want it to have soft landing but design it to survive some hard ladings. problem is that we have only 14 days before the temperature plunges.
actually you mean he's watching a lot of p*rn movies where Pizza buy, Delivery boy, taxi driver etc. are boinking his partners behind his back.
Last edited:
ISRO said hard landing and not crash landing , much difference. Why would they try to contact if it was a crash???
It is on the near side.. But would still be difficult to take any meaningful pic from Earth.. the orbiter might try to get nearer like a 30 km perigee orbit.. but this might compromise its other missions..Ha! You don't know anything. We should use Fawad Chaudhry's idea of using the Hubble telescope to see the moon. Even the rivets will become visible in HD.
You think so? All control algorithms are based on PID foundation and their advanced derivatives. Why do you think there were several rockets losing their balance during lift off - due to less or more power, and incorrect vector control. We should have sent those scientists to redo class 11
Sure, it is the mass - 1.4 ton Lander under moon's Gravity which is 1/6th of Earth's
That was good observation .... it is from 4:23 to 4:56 - the Chandrayan Lander