History of India- Introduction

  • Thread starter Thread starter Himanshu Pandey
  • Start date Start date
Ancient city Mohenjo-daro is centuries older than thought

By Jordan Joseph
Earth.com staff writer
1777313152442.png

Researchers have found that Mohenjo-daro, an ancient city in what is now southern Pakistan, is older than archaeologists believed, with a major city wall dated to around 2700 to 2600 BCE.

That earlier date pushes one of the first great cities along the Indus River in South Asia deeper into the past and changes when its urban story begins.

Buried wall clues

At the base of the western wall, buried mudbrick preserved the earliest clear sign that Mohenjo-daro’s city-building had begun.

From that evidence, the Sindh Directorate General of Antiquities & Archaeology (DGAA) documented a first wall that stood several generations earlier than expected.

That pushes the city’s known beginnings back before its better-known urban peak and gives its rise a longer timeline.

Even so, a single wall cannot tell the whole story of how Mohenjo-daro grew, which leaves the larger city waiting to come into view.

A city planned

Streets, house blocks, and raised platforms show that Mohenjo-daro was never a loose village that simply kept spreading.

Across 593 acres in Sindh, southern Pakistan, the ruins at the UNESCO World Heritage site preserve one of South Asia’s earliest large cities.

At its peak, about 40,000 people lived there in brick neighborhoods laid out with a level of order rare for the time.

Planning on that scale makes the older wall date harder to dismiss as a local oddity rather than part of a city.

Water ran everywhere

Water shaped daily life as much as walls did, and Mohenjo-daro’s plumbing still looks startlingly modern.

More than 700 wells fed homes, baths, and drains, moving clean water inward and waste away.

Builders used baked brick, tight joints, and sloped floors so dirty water could flow instead of soaking walls.

Such infrastructure points to shared rules, skilled labor, and civic oversight, not a town stumbling into urban life.

Growth in stages

Growth did not stop with that first barrier, because the western enclosure kept changing as the city gained size and complexity.

Later layers showed rebuilding through the city’s mature centuries, when denser neighborhoods and larger public works were taking hold.

“The walls were expanded and maintained until around 2200 BCE and possibly even longer,” the DGAA said in the same statement.

Seen over time, the wall becomes a marker for urban growth, not just a striking ruin beside a large, raised mound in the city’s western district.

Why timing matters

For years, many archaeologists placed Mohenjo-daro’s rise around 2500 BCE, when its grander public spaces became easier to see.

Finding a major wall slightly earlier shows the city did not appear all at once in finished form.

Archaeologists call that older stage the Kot Diji phase, an earlier stretch of Indus settlement building before the classic urban peak.

Seen that way, Mohenjo-daro looks less like a sudden arrival and more like a city that grew by building.

What still hides

Only about one-third of the ruins has been excavated since work began there in 1922.

Much of the city’s earliest story still sits below later rebuilding, salt damage, and a stubbornly high groundwater level.

Even so, deep coring under the wall found older pottery, which hints that settlement began before that first known fortification.

Buried depth leaves room for another surprise and warns against treating that first wall as the city’s true beginning.

An unclear ending

Abandonment still sits in the dark, and Mohenjo-daro’s end around 1800 to 1700 BCE remains hard to explain.

Stories about invasion or massacre keep returning, but evidence for organized warfare across Indus cities remains thin.

Scattered skeletons at Mohenjo-daro do not line up neatly with one final disaster, which weakens any single-cause ending.

So, the earlier wall date matters even more, because beginnings are clearer here than endings.

Drought across cities

Climate now offers the strongest broad explanation for why large Indus cities thinned out instead of recovering.

A 2025 study traced four long droughts that likely squeezed rivers, fields, and urban food supplies.

Because those dry spells lasted for decades, communities had time to adapt but less chance to rebuild old city life.

Even that idea leaves room for politics, disease, and migration, but it favors slow strain over sudden collapse.

Ruins under threat

Today’s ruins face a different threat, because salt-rich groundwater and weather attack brick once protected by burial.

Conservation teams must learn what stands where, when it was built, and which areas can still survive new digging.

“Future investigations will trace the plan of the city wall around the Stupa Mound in order to try and locate gateways,” the DGAA said in the same statement.

Saving Mohenjo-daro now depends on treating dating as a preservation tool, not just an academic timeline.

A longer history

Mohenjo-daro now appears to have a longer development, where organized building, water control, and social coordination developed earlier than expected.

In turn, that longer history sharpens the mystery of its decline and raises the stakes for protecting what still lies buried.

Ancient city Mohenjo-daro is centuries older than thought
 
Scientifically Speaking: An ancient Tamil visitor in Egypt’s Valley of the Kings

Ancient Indian graffiti found in Egypt’s Valley of the Kings reveals early global travel links and overlooked inscriptions hidden for nearly a century.

Updated on: Apr 18, 2026, 03:43 pm IST
By Anirban Mahapatra

I just returned from an extended trip to Egypt. The pyramids, the temples, and the museums, particularly the recently opened Grand Egyptian Museum, were extraordinary. So were the hieroglyphs and wall paintings that look like they were created yesterday, despite being more than three thousand years old in the Valley of the Kings at Luxor.
1777313746849.png
Tamil, Sanskrit inscriptions in Egypt tombs uncover ancient Indian travelers, highlighting global trade links and missed discoveries in historic records. (AFP Photo)

What also struck me was everything that has been added to it since. The walls of these tombs and temples are covered in centuries of graffiti. Greek and Roman visitors cut their names into the stone. Coptic Christians left crosses and inscriptions when they turned royal burial chambers into informal sacred spaces. Nineteenth-century European travelers on the Grand Tour scratched their names into the Temple of Luxor.

What had not been recognized until very recently was that, scattered across six tombs in the Valley of the Kings, are nearly thirty inscriptions in ancient Indian languages.

A man named Cikai Korran scratched his name eight times in five different tombs roughly two thousand years ago. In the tomb of Ramses IX, his inscription sits five to six metres above the entrance, and no one has yet figured out how he got up there. The Tamil text translates simply as “Cikai Korran came here and saw.”

The finding was presented at the International Conference on Tamil Epigraphy in Chennai in February by Ingo Strauch of the University of Lausanne and Charlotte Schmid of the French School of Asian Studies. About twenty of the inscriptions are in Tamil-Brahmi, the earliest known script for writing Tamil. The rest are in Sanskrit, Prakrit, and Gandhari-Kharoshthi, suggesting visitors arrived from across the Indian subcontinent.

A Sanskrit inscription identifies its author as a messenger of King Kshaharata, from a dynasty that ruled western India in the first century. In one tomb, the Sanskrit and Tamil graffiti appear to engage with a nearby Greek inscription, hinting that the writers could read across all three languages.

We have known for some time that ancient Indians travelled the Roman world. The trading colonies at Berenike on the Red Sea, the Indian artefacts on Socotra, and the Tamil-Brahmi pottery scattered across both paint a vivid picture of a connected ancient world in which goods and people moved between the Malabar coast and the Mediterranean for commerce.

The Valley of the Kings inscriptions add a more intimate layer. Korran had travelled inland to a sacred site already ancient in his own time. Like me, he was a tourist, though unlike me, he left his mark for posterity.

The inscriptions were not hidden. In 1926, the French scholar Jules Baillet published a catalogue of more than two thousand graffiti in these tombs. For the next century, generations of Egyptologists relied on it, but the question of what the unrecognized scratches might be was never asked, because those who know Indian languages do not study Egyptian pharaohs.

Strauch happened to know the languages that turned those ignored scratches into sentences. He noticed the writing on a tour, photographed it, took it home, and recognized what other scholars had walked past.

This is a reminder that what looks like a complete record can be incomplete for a hundred years, simply because the right reader has not arrived.

It is also a case where a particular kind of artificial intelligence has something to offer. Headline-grabbing examples of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in research tend to be the specialist ones. The Vesuvius Challenge has used machine learning and new imaging to read the charred Herculaneum scrolls buried by the eruption that destroyed Pompeii in 79 CE. These were long considered impossible to unroll without destroying them.

The large language models that most of us use are doing something different. They are not as deep as human experts or specialized AI models trained for specific tasks. They are wider in breadth but shallower in depth. A model that has read across Egyptology, Tamil literature, and Indian Ocean trade does not belong to any one of those fields. That is precisely what can make it useful as a connector of disparate ideas.

Strauch made his discovery because he was in a tomb where he saw the scribbles on the wall. But, had the question been asked, AI might have suggested years earlier that the marks Baillet ignored resembled Indian scripts and were worth showing to someone who could read them.

The world’s old catalogues and colonial-era reports almost certainly contain more ancient tourists waiting to be noticed.

The same is true across the sciences. We sit on vast archives of data, specimens, and observations gathered for one purpose and never reread for another.

Anirban Mahapatra is a scientist and author. His most recent book is When the Drugs Don’t Work. The views expressed are personal
Scientifically Speaking: An ancient Tamil visitor in Egypt’s Valley of the Kings