India - Pakistan Standoff 2019

Status
Not open for further replies.
noksss said:
Here too ISI wasted their money as common indians are not celebrating Burkha dutt, Rajdeep , Saagarika and Nidhi .
Click to expand...

These traitors are tip of an iceburg , the bigger crocodiles are in legislative assemblies , businessmen aswell , could be in Parliament and also in army HQ forming pro Islamic policies and soft defence policies towards Pakistan. While promoting such issues in politics which are dividing India and bringing anarchy.
Not all in R&AW are experts and dedicated, only a bunch of few are working rest are big time khassis. India should learn from Lanka how actual policies are made which are pro Majority. Where as in India policies are formed for minorities and majority jaye bhaad mein. Hindus are becoming influence less in India if nothing is done.
 
safriz said:
We know we are dealing with fools..
You are forgetting that India is not the only one who has nuclear weapons, Pakistan has too..
If India was willing to kill Millions of Pakistanis for an election stunt, we surely werent that stupid and did not want to kill tens of millions of already suffering Indians in return.
So being the better and bigger persons we ended your stupidity.
Click to expand...
India will survive if 700 million Indians are killed (Thats the maximum you can kill with 200 nuclear bombs each 300 Kilotonnes dropped in best places India).

Pakistan will NOT survive. Just 70 of India's bombs will be enough to kill VIRTUALLY EVERY PAKISTANI.

Thats the difference. Hope you understand and appreciate.

BTW Pakistan DOES NOT have a deliverable 100 KT+ bomb. Half of your weapons are essentially suitcase nukes. Meant to stop armored columns in deserts of Rajasthan. Practically useless against a strategic threat.


Last but not the least : Indians are killing you with Timaatars. But you know, just in case we are keeping some nukes too.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: LoneWolfSandeep, BlackOpsIndia and Austerlitz
I am honestly amazed. Pakistan is like the little kid who buys a brick game and thinks he has the capabilities of a game boy.

The biggest yield (quoting PAEC) these morons ever got is 40KT. Lets assume New Delhi to be ground zero (I know I know about BMD)
Worst case is 220,000 fatalities and 1 Million plus injuries of varying degree. Economic damage to the tune of 40 Billion plus.

The country we are talking about has 4 other major population clusters - Mumbai, Bangalore, Chennai, Calcutta. It will be a nasty 5 years but things will work out.

This scenario is plausible IF their strike gets carried out, IF their missile is not stopped by our BMD, IF their warhead works properly.

How they think they can manage to kill "Tens of Millions of Indians" is beyond me.


PS - Imran Khan might just do it. It will get rid of the military and also India's reaction will give him a chance to realize his dream of making "Naya Pakistan" since the old one wont be around anymore.
 
What nuclear war? First India needs to have balls to stop the water flow into Pakistan. More than half of the napaki population will come down on knees. It shuld have been done after 26/11 and till now the donkeys in administration finding out possibilities of doing this. If we can't do this we can't press the button , but if NSA Ajit Doval has the authority or people like Yogi are in the hold of power, then they will definitely press it. Others are weak hearted khassis and big mouths, even Napakis don't have balls.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Paro
By 2032 we will be a 10 trillion dollar economy..we will have both the capacity to launch sanctions on our own and also simply overmatch pak through brute budgetary power.Job until then is keep pak economy stagnant and under stress..keep banging at loc..in a decade pak will be an insignificant force even if it can survive current bankruptcy and internal rebellions it will take atleast a decade to recover from its debt quicksand if at all.Indo pak geopolitical rivalry will die a natural death no matter how much the gernails huff and puff as pak simply cant match our economy.By 2022 already our conventional strength would become qualitatively and quantitatively decisively superior.By 2030 we will have an economy 20-30 times their size ..itll be a total mismatch.Another critical development is our own Military industrial complex is finally taking off with private sector..give it another decade see where it goes.Pak has to pretty much import everything or repaint stuff under license with desi name.
 
  • Like
Reactions: phndrt, Enquencher, noksss and 7 others
Bon Plan said:
AMRAAM D at such a range is on a ballistic trajectory. Far away from its NEZ, so useless except to afraid an opponent.
Click to expand...
USAF fires them from over 130kms so that the initial plume of the missile booster is not picked up by MAWS. Latest gen MAWS can pick up a missile launch from 42Nms. But Meteor will have a hot tail thruout its flight and will be picked up much earlier compared to AMRAAM D.
 
vstol Jockey said:
But Meteor will have a hot tail thruout its flight and will be picked up much earlier compared to AMRAAM D.
Click to expand...

It's apparently the opposite.

Meteor's tail will be colder than the sustainer of a solid rocket. Plus it's slower than a solid rocket during cruise by at least mach 0.5. It only speeds up higher than the solid rocket during the endgame. So it's overall a more stealthy missile when it counts and an overall superior missile during the endgame.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Austerlitz
randomradio said:
It's apparently the opposite.

Meteor's tail will be colder than the sustainer of a solid rocket. Plus it's slower than a solid rocket during cruise by at least mach 0.5. It only speeds up higher than the solid rocket during the endgame. So it's overall a more stealthy missile when it counts and an overall superior missile during the endgame.
Click to expand...
I disagree. It has a ramjet engine and therefore it has to travel above Mach-3 thruout the profile.
 
vstol Jockey said:
I disagree. It has a ramjet engine and therefore it has to travel above Mach-3 thruout the profile.
Click to expand...

Ramjets do not need to go mach 3+. Mach 2.2 to mach 2.5 is enough for efficient cruise. When sea skimming, the Coyote does mach 2.5.

Anyway:
Flight of the Meteor - Royal Aeronautical Society
“Our principal requirement was to improve on the AIM-120 advanced medium-range air-to-air missile (AMRAAM), in particular sustained performance and a no escape zone,” explains Andy Bradford, chief engineer and project head of the Meteor programme. “Although the Meteor is not initially as fast as current MRAAMs, it is throttleable and has a much longer endurance and longer range.”

So the Meteor is slower than solid rocket.
 
randomradio said:
Ramjets do not need to go mach 3+. Mach 2.2 to mach 2.5 is enough for efficient cruise. When sea skimming, the Coyote does mach 2.5.

Anyway:
Flight of the Meteor - Royal Aeronautical Society
“Our principal requirement was to improve on the AIM-120 advanced medium-range air-to-air missile (AMRAAM), in particular sustained performance and a no escape zone,” explains Andy Bradford, chief engineer and project head of the Meteor programme. “Although the Meteor is not initially as fast as current MRAAMs, it is throttleable and has a much longer endurance and longer range.”

So the Meteor is slower than solid rocket.
Click to expand...
Read again "is not initially as fast". This explains and proves my statement. It has a slower initial launch velocity compared to AMRAAM D but during cruise, it is faster than AMRAAM D.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Bon Plan
safriz said:
OK then another "Viir jawan" Kalbhushan Yadev is still in our custody.
Pls do a nuclear strike for him 😅😂😅
Click to expand...

He will come back and will recieve the Hero's welcome the son of the motherland so richly deserves. I consider him my elder brother and will always consider him as such.
 
vstol Jockey said:
USAF fires them from over 130kms so that the initial plume of the missile booster is not picked up by MAWS. Latest gen MAWS can pick up a missile launch from 42Nms. But Meteor will have a hot tail thruout its flight and will be picked up much earlier compared to AMRAAM D.
Click to expand...
Meteor used a regulated stato. that means it can used the stato at max thrust at the beginning to create a max kinetic and altitude energy, and then reduce it until the last miles if more energy to be fully agile is needed (if there remains some propellant !).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom