Status
Not open for further replies.
There is an understanding between India and Pakistan that they will not hit civilians across India and restrict to Kashmir and Punjab and India will not go beyond POK and Pesharwar Balochistan towards Sindh and Punjab to hit civilians. One can see that easily how the pattern is.
2008 Mumbai Attack was what ?......RSS ki saazish ? RAA ka false flag ?
 
There is an understanding between India and Pakistan that they will not hit civilians across India and restrict to Kashmir and Punjab and India will not go beyond POK and Pesharwar Balochistan towards Sindh and Punjab to hit civilians. One can see that easily how the pattern is.
Its not an understanding its not productive enough. A bomb blast in the mainland wont make it to headlines the same way it does in kashmir unless it has very high casualties. Then there is also an advantage of a tighter clampdown in kashmir which will attract more youth against the state, similar strategy isn’t effective in the mainland.
 
  • Like
Reactions: screambowl
HVTs from Pakistan Army neutralized ? Are these guys the ones Ankit referred to..?
2008 Mumbai Attack was what ?......RSS ki saazish ? RAA ka false flag ?
If you observe closely... There has not been any "Jehadi" terror attack in Mainland India (excluding Kashmir) against "civilian" Targets, after Modi took over in 2014. Maybe India has built up the covert capabilities to hit Lahore, Karachi, Islamabad in retaliation to an attack on India's economic centers...
 
Its not an understanding its not productive enough. A bomb blast in the mainland wont make it to headlines the same way it does in kashmir unless it has very high casualties. Then there is also an advantage of a tighter clampdown in kashmir which will attract more youth against the state, similar strategy isn’t effective in the mainland.
But, an attack on India's economic centers creates fear in the hearts of businessmen, investors and citizen alike... One 26/11 does more harm to the Indian psyche than 10 such incidents in a conflict zone like Kashmir...
 
Post 2014 sir. Before that it was happening.
After Modi came to power for the first time, I presume. Wasn't this "honeymoon period" of the new govt. used by the Pakistanis to test the new govt. by attacking the Indian high commission in Afghanistan(in Herat, I think) ? Why would the have agreements with us and we would agree to it at a time when Indians were dying in Afghanistan ?
If you observe closely... There has not been any "Jehadi" terror attack in Mainland India (excluding Kashmir) against civilian Targets, after Modi took over in 2014. Maybe India has built up the covert capabilities to hit Lahore, Karachi, Islamabad in retaliation to an attack on India's economic centers...
That seems plausible. However it doesn't look like Delhi plans to leave attacks in Kashmir go unpunished either. The aerial raid, the near constant small arms fire, daily use of mortars and weekly use of artillery solidifies the point. From Pakistan's POV this is a rather sh*tty deal to make with the Indians. They gain nothing in return. I just find it hard to believe it.
 
But, an attack on India's economic centers creates fear in the hearts of businessmen, investors and citizen alike... One 26/11 does more harm to the Indian psyche than 10 such incidents in a conflict zone like Kashmir...
The aim of Pakistan is to keep the pot boiling but not spill over. An attack on an economic center will undoubtedly attract a military action in which they will be forced to retaliate and will lead to war they are going to lose as always. They don't want war but enough tension to keep their avaam vary of India so to rule over them. Pulamala attack was a miss calculation on their side. They didn't expect so many casualties to begin with.
 
Why would the have agreements with us and we would agree to it at a time when Indians were dying in Afghanistan ?

Well Sir it's the responsibility of Afghan government to protect foreigners there. If Indians have problem in Afghanistan Indian government can only speak to Afghan government. It's not mainland India. India if control and normalizes Kashmir that will be punching above the weight. India needs to build capability for next 10-15 years.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Gautam
1- why those su30 on CAP were not carrying r27 missiles which have better range than r77 ...
Well they were there to defend the AirBases and other military assets, with the proximity to LOC they did not really needed them ( in the role they expected to play)

2- when they knew that missiles are being fired at there plane , they took countermeasures and stay out of there range , but why they didn't climb to higher attitude to get firing solution ... I mean they would have enough time after defeating first aim120
1) ROE in place.....2) They were firing from their side of LOC 3) Aamraams out ranged Su30s arsenals.....

3- where were other su 30 , I mean in situations like this you put your best plane in forward bases..
What makes you say the situation like this???
Let us look at the situation then: We went and bombed them at our will unchallenged, And their false bravado was in danger they needed some thing to show off to their country men and they tried to attack us from their side and thru a technical violation..... And even in that Violation got spanked and lost their best asset F16


4- why didn't those m2k fire any missiles at those j17 jets which were close to them ... why they didn't engage when su30 were fired upon..! There were some members also saying that m2k were also locked by f16 who knows.! What happened with those m2k.
Again almost all of them stayed inside their borders...
 
Well they were there to defend the AirBases and other military assets, with the proximity to LOC they did not really needed them ( in the role they expected to play)


1) ROE in place.....2) They were firing from their side of LOC 3) Aamraams out ranged Su30s arsenals.....


What makes you say the situation like this???
Let us look at the situation then: We went and bombed them at our will unchallenged, And their false bravado was in danger they needed some thing to show off to their country men and they tried to attack us from their side and thru a technical violation..... And even in that Violation got spanked and lost their best asset F16



Again almost all of them stayed inside their borders...
Okay .. but still 2 su30mki were facing 8 f16s, we should had more numbers... R27 range is more than aim120 and few months ago, IAF signed the deal for this missile...
 
There is an understanding between India and Pakistan that they will not hit civilians across India and restrict to Kashmir and Punjab and India will not go beyond POK and Pesharwar Balochistan towards Sindh and Punjab to hit civilians. One can see that easily how the pattern is.

I rembember Doval clarifying some time back that India has promised Pakistan that it will not go beyond the Balochistan-Iran border to its west and Afghanistan border to its north. As well POK on the east and Sindh on Arabian sea are the taken-for-granted assault areas. On the IB it will be business as usual. ;);)
 
I kind of suspected the motives but was not too sure

You see if one manages to take stock of the NBC equipments and related paraphernalia being inducted or developed , one might get a general idea of some of the possible measures being exercised / contemplated

I found the pic of a man portable device for detecting and tracking radiation sources ( obviously nukes ). Also it has features to discriminate eg wheather it is actually weapon grade enriched uranium and not simply uranium decoy to complicate any heist.


The Indian preparedness for fighting 'Dirty' is a different topic altogether, something on which I shall not comment at all except to say that we are prepared to, as much as we can possibly be prepared, keeping in view the tardy execution of projects by DRDO & DPSUs who make tall claims and fail to provide enough in quantity and in time. As usual, ad hoc arrangements are made at the last minute. This happens in a country where the common citizen blames the forces for only wanting phoren maal. No sir, it is not that we want phoren maal. It is that the desi simply lies and cheats all the time and leaves us high and dry.

As for what specifically we can do - well, we can do a lot. There is never a 100% guarantee, be very clear. But there is more than enough chances of success.
 
There is an understanding between India and Pakistan that they will not hit civilians across India and restrict to Kashmir and Punjab and India will not go beyond POK and Pesharwar Balochistan towards Sindh and Punjab to hit civilians. One can see that easily how the pattern is.


And how are you aware of this "understanding"?
 
Why so pessimistic all the time ? They were attacking us before everyday without much retribution. Now they are getting killed left and right far quicker that ever before.

Will that stop them ? Nope. But at least the cost inflicted is much higher now. Give it sometime this level of retaliation, whether internal or external, will become the norm. Slowly but surely it will damage the enemy irreversibly.

We are sure as hell not gonna win a proxy war in a day now are we ? Especially not after sleeping on all maters regarding defence/national security for the last decade. The laggardness on important matters will continue to cost us for quite sometime.


Ah, the trigger point for what I wanted to say.


This is what the broad thought behind Indian actions is.

1. India can not reasonably find peace with Pakistan through dialogue. That has been made very clear. Every time we have tried to have peace through dialogue, an honourable peace at that, we have been taken as being weak and Pakistan has attempted to undermine us, either through direct military action or through proxies. Even the present dispensation in 1st innings, attempted to find peace, and we had Pathankot, Gurdaspur etc.

2. If one takes a look at the Turkish military offensive in Northern Syria today, you will see that the Turkish forces have consolidated the 30 kms buffer zone they wanted to, more or less, on day 3 of their offensive actions. This, from what can arguably be considered as the strongest military force, fighting against what is at best an irregular force bereft of heavy artillery/armour and no air force. The pertinent point is, it took Turkey 3 days, and they have yet to clear the area completely. Now extrapolating it to an Indo-Pak conflict let us consider the following:

a. Pakistan has an army that is quite well trained, equipped and strong
b. Pakistan has an air force that carries quite a punch
c. The Indo-Pak border has a variation in topography. From Mountains in North, to system of parallel canals in Punjab that afford natural
obstacles to an attacking force, to deserts in south and marshes to the farthest south.

3. From 2 above, India will need longer time in Punjab sector. Let there be non illusions on that. The layered canals will slow operations. Anyone who claims otherwise is living in a fools paradise. The only way we can achieve faster breakthroughs is if the Pakistani forces thin their troops to relieve pressure elsewhere. Otherwise - it shall be a tough going. Heavy in terms of costs.

4. India shall need 4 to 5 days to near Karachi in a hypothetical war. That is simply too long. Because, entering the city and securing it is another ball game, one that can go on for months.

5. In short, all those who fantasize that through military action we can 'defeat' Pakistan, need a reality check. What is defeat for Pakistan? For them, only their complete destruction will be their defeat (and for me too). And that can not be achieved militarily.

6. What we are seeing now is the policy that will undermine the Pakistani state in all spheres. And ironically, they know it and can do very little about it. Towards this aim, I shall mention undermentioned points:

a. Concentrated diplomatic offensive: This is the mainstay of Indian policy. By not responding to PAF actions on 27 Feb 2019, we ensured that the narrative remained of terror and not Kashmir dispute.
b. Stressing Pakistani Economy: Although the Pakistanis are our biggest allies in this, we have helped them along with actions along LC. By keeping it active, systematic targeting and cross LC engagements we have been able to achieve two objectives - (i) Emphasize counter terror operations and (ii) ensure high level of troop deployment and faster consumption of men and materials. This costs money.
c. Refusing to engage with Pakistan but engaging with its traditional allies. This has been the biggest coup. By not responding militarily to 27 Feb 2019, we have been able to keep the narrative to anti-terror operations and that is quite reasonable for the supporters of Pakistan, who have helped it in the past but find it imprudent and diplomatically embarassing to continue to help a 'friend' who has repeatedly been found to harbour terrorists.

In a nutshell, we will continue to see heavy pressure along LC and pressure on Pakistani economy will only grow worse over the coming months as even the Chinese have been told in no uncertain terms that their exposure to the Pakistani economy is their business, as Indian security and what it needs to do about it, is Indian business.
 
Last edited:
The Salal dam in J&K on the Chenab river was originally a victim to the Indian govt.'s desires to make unilateral concessions to Pakistan for "peace". The agreements with the Pakistanis seriously damaged the sustainability of the dam and the Indian engineers viewed it as too high a price to pay for bilateralism. The concessions accelerated the problem of siltation. Around 2002 the problems became so bad that there were talks of shutting down the dam. There were some media reports then about the GoI reviewing some of the concessions made to the Pakistanis and releasing some funds to rectify some of the problems quietly without informing Pakistan(all of the problems cannot be rectified, at least not without creating a spectacle). Then all media coverage went away, nobody knew what happened to the plans to rectify the problems, nothing on this was ever reported again.

Fast forward to 2019, the dam is operating at its full capacity. All the talks of shutting it down fizzled away. So what changed ? The concessions made to Pakistan by the ABV govt. was due to Pak's fears of India causing an artificial flood or drought by using this dam. Remember Pakistan is heavily dependent of the Chenab for its agricultural and drinking water needs. If the dam is still working some of these concessions have been pulled back.

 
Talking of destruction of terror, we have had a achivement in our hinterlands. Home Ministry may or may not announce it now. But its significant.
If the frequency of our actions have been increasing over the pase several months, what is the reason for the same - better intelligence or more resolve or both? What could be the reason for improved intelligence gathering since the BJP govt. is coming hard on the Kashmiris?
 

@Falcon

If the frequency of our actions have been increasing over the pase several months, what is the reason for the same - better intelligence or more resolve or both? What could be the reason for improved intelligence gathering since the BJP govt. is coming hard on the Kashmiris?
Lot of collective hard work from top to bottom is the cause.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.