India - Pakistan Standoff 2019
- Thread starter nair
- Start date
- Status
I think this is overestimation.I don't accept that after paf fighters come and bomb indian territory,IAF didnt have permission to shoot.It seems with amraam had earlier locks at range even though at that range its largely useless against countermeasures.Its not good that sukhois fired no bvr of their own.I retain my doubts on untested r-77.
Whenever a CAP is directed to intercept a strike, It is immediatly replaced by another CAP and the ORP2 are also brought up. on 27th, A total of six Mig-21s were launched but only one took part in the combat. Others stayed within our own airspace waiting to engage any PAF fighter which dared to come deeper.
So PAF F-16 if they took part in 27th February face off with IAF were carrying 120 km range AIM-120C AMRAAM.
IAF MIG-21 flown by Abhinandan was armed with 30 km range R-73.
So the F-16 could shoot down Indian Mig-21 from 120 km away. But for the mig-21 to shoot down F-16 it had to be within 30 km.
Yet the Pakistani F-16 pilot was so stupid that instead of using his weapon from a safe distance, he felt the need to come with the enemy missile range and get shot down
Doesn't make any sense.
So our interceptor at LoC should go back in India and start from 120 KM so that your intruding fighters can engage in BVR. lol
What happened to MKI's air superiority? Couldn't fire a single missile from its truck load.
ROE did not allow them to launch any missile attack as most PAF fighters remained well within their own airspace. The AMRAAMs were launched from within their own airspace.
Kabaddi ka match hai kya? Maaro and get inside your line and you are safe?
They can launch AMRAAM from their space, but MKI cant do the same from our airspace?
I To have my doubt on R-77. Better Integrate Derby ER or New K-77M
Why would IAF Want MBDA Meteors for Mki's But MBDA only agreed for ASRAAM
Last edited:
Thats what even I questioned. But the people who took the decision and imposed these ROE must have had some reason.
But then ROE applied violated from Pakistani's side And violation of it required prompt action by IAF
They have all the "reasons" to hide everything. Can they ever do something a normal person can see and appreciate?
I will be a traitor if I tag these "reasons" with their incompetency.
Is it the same logic "Mandir wahi banaenge par date nahi bataenge"?
I have seen plenty of videos from fighters bombing the $hit out of enemy installations, somehow India do not want to reveal its "alien" technology.
I agree. But the rules are written in blood. Don't violate them and adhere to them.
One AMRAAM was Enough to Nail DG ISPR lies in front of PAK awam
Because he asked everything Tamater...
Tomato Sandwich with tomato sauce.
Tamater bhurji in vegetable.
Tomato soup
He even asked tomato salad.
They wanted to keep him for 8 days but their economy couldn't afford him.
Pak awam is madarsaa chap..unko koi farak nahi padta.military is their god
The new narrative in Pakistan is to somehow justify that F-16 didn't violate any agreement, from NOT using F-16 to F-16 deployed as per contract.
Daily a campaign is launched in Pakistani media to dig out old tweets or documents of US officials however informal to justify f16 didnt violate any contract, compare this to initial claims of not using f16 in that combat, ISPR suffocating and trying to find something, anything to remain afloat after that costly failed raid.
Daily a campaign is launched in Pakistani media to dig out old tweets or documents of US officials however informal to justify f16 didnt violate any contract, compare this to initial claims of not using f16 in that combat, ISPR suffocating and trying to find something, anything to remain afloat after that costly failed raid.
- Status