Indian Hypersonic Propulsion Developments

Probably about 13, might be mistaken. There was a doc from 2014 https://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2206795.pdf
new facilities have come up since.

I kinda zoomed & posted part of that picture btw, attached the page here for a bit of obscurity, its from a doc I kept , available in public domain but quite obscured. It felt like basically the hstdv test ground version. This is probably quite old by now, might be from mid 2010s.

Edit: Please kindly remove if deemed violating rules.
 

Attachments

  • scrm35.png
    scrm35.png
    483.3 KB · Views: 104
  • scrm36.png
    scrm36.png
    25.8 KB · Views: 112
  • scrm37.png
    scrm37.png
    49.7 KB · Views: 104
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SammyBoi
@Gautam bhaiya? :)
:ROFLMAO:
Do you have any idea about the number of wind tunnel facilities India has, and those capable of supporting Hypersonics testing? For example, the US has 26, I believe....
The first series of hypersonic wind tunnels were set up with the objective of studying the hypersonic terminal phase of our ballistic missiles & to aid the development of launch vehicles in early 80s. NAL, DRDO & ISRO's VSSC were the first to set up such facilities. These facilities had quite high spool up time & could only test small sized (about the size of your phone) models. Thus, only the most critical project could get a shot at these tunnels. All other projects had to avail wind tunnels outside India for testing.

Then came the next round of funding from GoI around the late 1990s & early 2000s. This time fund didn't just go to ISRO, DRDO, HAL, NAL but also to academic institutions with ties to ISRO & DRDO. That's how IIT Kanpur ended up with a great wind tunnel. A lot of our air-launched munitions (ASTRA, NG-ARM etc.) under-went some wind tunnel studies there. Many other IITs have their own tunnels. IISc somehow managed to get a hypersonic tunnel by 2012. Today IISc has 3 supersonic & 2 hypersonic wind tunnels.

In terms of numbers, I would say we have 15-18 hypersonic tunnels. Number of active tunnels fluctuate as new ones get built & old ones are shut down/upgraded. The problem now isn't number of tunnels, it is the size & max speed. Historically, the tunnels hosted by our premier institutes have been smaller than the ones with our peers. Most of our hypersonic tunnels operate in the low to mid hypersonic speed range (Mach 5-8.5).

We are starting to address that problem with some of the newer tunnels. For example, DRDL's newly inaugurated hypersonic wind tunnel in Hyderabad & the 2 upcoming hypersonic tunnels at VSSC are on par with the best in the world. These tunnels can house wind tunnel models the size of an adult human & can operate at high hypersonic speeds (Mach 8.5-12). They have smaller spool up/down time & use regenerative gas impingement which allows you to test models much quicker than previously possible.
 
There are a number of constraints that are detrimental to the development of fully fledged R&D work DRDO do. Lack of suitable testing facility, lack of good enough testing equipment for very high level products, and lack of materials & industrial presence cum divergence are some major factors. This is hindrance for your regular weapon system program, conventional up to supersonic level. Now we are going into hypersonics sector for which materials needed , grade, quality of material are way different to present day high supersonic level weapons that are currently used. For example, I saw this below estimate chart, its from a report around 2020-21, just for steel, different grades of steel that are vital.

Screenshot.png


You can see the quantity needed. Then there are alloys, superalloys, titanium alloys, aluminium alloys, ceramics, C C brake-disks all these things for which large quantity are needed as these are vital for aerospace industry. Past few years project directors have been making overtures to the industry to build capacity, there is great opportunity for upgrade & indigenise in mfg, otherwise lot of stuff need to be imported. The report , some may have seen it, it included huge list of materials we import from all over the world. There are some webinars, presentations in open source if you see those you can see the challenge DRDO face. For hypersonics, even further improvements , much better materials, tracking system, telemetry will be needed. I regularly see people point out delay in projects, well look at the challenges that money alone can not solve, and there are shoestring budget too.
 
What did the commentator madam said? anyone can identify?

article taken off
phase down ? confirmed
article air/act? normal
 

Also good discussion below. So that would be good payload & very long range. Could easily be turned in 1000km with larger payload as well.
I found the Ansys article by Prof Dr V Babu sir of IITM, big part of it already posted before in page 4 by Gautam sirji , saw its reference cited in a NASA related presentation also. Those HSTDV related studies are the cornerstone of todays tests. Fortunately I also found the Ansys edition from 2014 online (see the reference article) which I saved a copy before. Will add the 4 pages from there later, it was an article cited in many related papers by many researchers.

scrmiitm01.png

scrmiitm02.png

scrmiitm03.png
 

Also good discussion below. So that would be good payload & very long range. Could easily be turned in 1000km with larger payload as well.
I found the Ansys article by Prof Dr V Babu sir of IITM, big part of it already posted before in page 4 by Gautam sirji , saw its reference cited in a NASA related presentation also. Those HSTDV related studies are the cornerstone of todays tests. Fortunately I also found the Ansys edition from 2014 online (see the reference article) which I saved a copy before. Will add the 4 pages from there later, it was an article cited in many related papers by many researchers.

View attachment 26306
View attachment 26307
View attachment 26308
Meanwhile DDR editor Sriram reporting that all wasn't well with the recent HSDTV test . ToI even carried a report it failed .
 
Meanwhile DDR editor Sriram reporting that all wasn't well with the recent HSDTV test . ToI even carried a report it failed .
Yeah I saw it before. I think its because DRDO did not confirm anything, even the Janes report mention this part about test results being looked.
My guess is if test is inconclusive then material issue for scramjet ignition at high altitude. Remember that CAG report on buying materials few years ago?

Screenshot (3).png
 
In the program saxena sir said recent HSTDV worked & the vehicle flew for more than 22 seconds. Similar was also said in aero india seminar as well, 20 sec of flight achieved ie short duration test must be successful now.
 
In the program saxena sir said recent HSTDV worked & the vehicle flew for more than 22 seconds. Similar was also said in aero india seminar as well, 20 sec of flight achieved ie short duration test must be successful now.
Wasn't the mission for the latest test to last for > 20 seconds ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Abheer
Wasn't the mission for the latest test to last for > 20 seconds ?
yeah, the short duration test target was likely 25 seconds because ground level test setup was like that. Of course I would not know if later some changes were done or not but that was how theory was tested. Heard some speculation of weaponised level testing but not sure about it. Anyone who has attended DRDo seminar today or the Sarod 2023 in last 3 days will definitely know better.
 
This is a great write-up on HSTDV and the recent test. by Gen VK Saxena sir, good to see him making appearance on the Defenders & then write this.

The Premise​

On 27 Jan 2023, the Abdul Kalam Island off the Odisha Coast was abuzz with hectic activity. At the countdown 5,4,3,2,1, now….. the Agni I Missile lifted off carrying the Hypersonic Technology Demonstration Vehicle (HSTDV) for the third time[1]. The earlier two tests took place on 07 Sep 2020[2] and 12 Jun 2019[3] respectively.

While the naysayers would trash all the three successive tests as a hat-trick of failures/ negligible successes, this brief work argues that this trio of tests marks a steady climb from strength-to-strength on the uphill hypersonic journey; albeit in the ‘falling and getting up mode’ and a long way to go uphill still left.

Hypersonic – the Rise to Fame​

‘Hypersonic’ has risen to fame in the past decade or so. It is trendy to crown the hypersonic capability with many an accoutrements – disruptive technology/game-changer, unstoppable and more.

Here is a de-cluttered version of why ‘hypersonic’ is splashing so much water?[4]

- A hypersonic body (missile/glide vehicle) is a projectile that can travel at speeds that are five times (or more) than the speed of soundwhich is 0.343km/secand is called Mach 1. At this scale, Mach 5 will correspond to 1.715 Km/sec or 6174 km/h.

- Hypersonic weapons remain within the atmosphere (below 100 km) and utilise the atmospheric oxygen in combustion of their fuel.

- Such weapons currently exist in two categories, namely the Hypersonic Cruise missile (HCM) and Hypersonic glide Vehicle (HGV). Some salient points about these are presented:-

  • An HCM is a typical cruise missile that is guided, remains low and is capable of striking terrestrial targets with high precision. The difference between a normal cruise missile and an HCM is, that the latter is ‘all-the-way powered’ missile. It’s SCRAMJET (supersonic combustion RAMJET) engine is capable of sustaining combustion of fuel and oxygen at supersonic speeds thus propelling the HCM at such tremendous speeds that are in the region of Mach 5-20.
  • A HGV is propelled to a very high speed using a booster rocket. In this process, a stage is reached when the shock waves originating from the flight start to act as lifting surfaces. When this happens, the lift-to-drag ratio goes very high, the HGV separates from the booster and propels to the target at supersonic speeds ( this is called the wave-rider phenomenon).
- HCMs and HGVs are unstoppable by any conventional air defence and anti-missile system simply because they beat the minimum time required by a conventional system to accomplish the cycle of detection-interception and kill.

- Besides being unstoppable through conventional arsenal, hypersonic weapons have other unique strengths. These are briefly stated:-

  • ‘Speed is the new stealth’ has been explained. The sheer speed makes such weapons too-fast to be detected.
  • This further gives such weapon the capability to keep under their potential threat-print, large swaths of areas in the defender’s domain (forcing him to deploy resources on each of the vulnerabilities therein).
  • Warheads carried at such tremendous speeds have greatly enhanced kinetic-kill effect due to the sheer momentum possessed by the warhead. According to one estimate, a warhead hurled at Mach 5 is likely to be 36 times more powerful as compared to a warhead striking at a normal speed.

What Threatens the Hypersonic Domain?​

When US Carrier Strike Group Nimitz commenced operations in the South China Sea[5] with effect from 12 Jan 2023 and later on 29 Jan 2023, Gen Mike Minihan, the head of US air Mobility Command expressed his view of a probable US-China conflict in 2025[6], China showed her response in several ways (not covered), one of these is its claim of its Hypersonic anti-ship missile YJ 21 (Eagle Strike 21) which at Mach 10 (12348km/h) has the capability of penetrating directly through the deck of the aircraft carrier and eliminating it[7]. Such is the claimed power of hypersonic weapons.
China possesses both the HCM and the HGV capability. Some points related to the Chinese hypersonic journey (threat) are briefly stated:-[8]
- Chinese hypersonic development (own/stolen) is believed to have commenced way back but started to get noticed around 2015-17.

- In May 2018, Chinese tested an HGV on-board the boost vehicle DF 17. The projectile reportedly flew for 1400km and hit its target in the Xinjiang province within meters.

- In the same year in Aug, there was a report of a test flight of an HCM named Starry Sky -2 or Xinkong-2. The missile did 5.5-6 Mach, flew for 10 mins and achieved an altitude of 32 km.

- Later in Sep 2018, the open source reported a test run of three wide speed ranges scaled down hypersonic aircrafts (DF 18 1S, 2S and 3S) capable of prosecuting a precision strike with conventional, as well as, nuclear weapons.

- In Jul Aug 2021, the Chinese HGV on board the booster Long March, actually went over the South Pole achieving over Mach 5 (aim - ducking US missile defences poised North NE?).

- Something unprecedented happened in this test. Towards the end of the flight, the HGV launched another air-to-air-missile that flew for short time and plunged into the ocean (experts opined that it could be a satellite killer).

What does all the above mean?​

- China is moving up swiftly along both the verticals of hypersonic capability.
- It is the sense of the author that on its cross-wires of global competition and deterrence is more US than India.

- The threat along with is associated command and control system is likely to be ‘battle deployable’ in a matter of few years.

The Indian Journey​

With the hypersonic put in the perspective and threat lines broadly defined, the stage is set to explore the Indian story. Salient milestones in this journey are presented:-

- The Indian hypersonic journey started sometime in 2004. It was the year when the DRDO started R&D to realise a conceptual hypersonic air frame.

- In 2008, Dr V K Saraswat, the then DG DRDO hinted at the possible dual use of Hypersonic technology both as an HCM, as well as, a low cost satellite launch vehicle.

- The years 2011-2017 were largely spent in refining the hypersonic airframe design, building thermal protection techniques accomplishing integration strategies and more.

- During this period, two wind tunnels were put to use; one ex Israel and other provided by National Aeronautical Laboratory (NAL).

- It was around 2019 that our hypersonic capability achieved a test flight maturity.

The Hypersonic Test Runs​

First Test​

The first test of the Hypersonic Technology Demonstration Vehicle (HSTDV) took place on 12 Jun 2019.[9]These are some factual details about the test:-
- The HSTDV was a 5.6 m aerodynamic body designed and developed by DRDO.

- It was boosted by Agni 1 solid-fuelled medium range ballistic missile, range 700km[10]).

- The HSTDV achieved a speed of 6.5 Mach and an altitude of 30 km. It was in flight for nearly 20 secs.

Second Test[11]

The second test took place on 07 Sep 2020. The HSTDV achieved a speed of Mach 6 and flew for about 20 secs.

Third Test[12]

This test took place on 27 Jan 2023. The test target was to achieve a controlled and sustained powered flight of 600 secs achieving a range of 1500 km with a warhead carriage capability of 300-400 kg. Though specific figures as to the achievement or otherwise of the test targets has not been reported by the DRDO in the open source, the flight test has been claimed a success by the official Govt media.

Analysis​

The DRDO in various reports after the tests (1-3) have claimed the following successes:-

  • Maturity of design for an aerodynamic configuration capable of hypersonic manoeuvre.
  • Thermo-structural maturity of HSTDV to withstand high temperatures.
  • Proving of boost technologies to achieve speeds so as to set up the wave-rider phenomenon.
  • Successful testing of scramjet propulsion technology for initiation of ignition and sustained combustion at hypersonic air flows using atmospheric oxygen
  • Proving of the separation mechanism of the HGV from the booster and its powered hypersonic flight thereafter.

What the naysayers say:-​

The naysayers (for many reasons – not covered) have dwarfed the tests by asserting the following:-
- The tests did not succeed the way it has been projected.

- In the first test, the ballistic carrier could not achieve its target; the booster went into an uncontrolled mode and did not achieve the required altitude.

- The HSTDV has not yet achieved its slated target of a sustained powered flight.

Author’s View​

It is the sense of the author that the truth lies somewhere in the middle of the two versions; one of the DRDO/MoD and other of the naysayers. Following points are stated:-
- The live streaming videos of all the three launches do exhibit the following for anybody to see:-

  • Successful lifting of the booster (Agni 1) at the end of the reverse countdown in all the three times.
  • Hearing and seeing the audios and videos of the counting up after the countdown one can hear live reports from the Mission Control Centre reportannouncing ‘article taken off’ ‘article health normal’.. etc. This substantiates some of the success claims made above but NOT ALL.
- In fact to achieve a feat called the ‘sustained, powered and controlled hypersonic flight’ is no easy task. It poses multiple challenges some of which are briefly stated:-

  • Developing materials that can provide thermal protection at super-high surface temperatures. In case of HSTDV these can go as high as 2000-22000C (40000F).
  • For this the HSTDV is configured by using different alloys, optimising on the chemical properties of each (Titanium alloy for airframe, Niobium alloy for engine and mnemonic alloy for outer surfaces – chemical properties not covered).
  • Overcoming the air-plasma barrier in communication and connectivity; at hypersonic speeds the electrons surrounding the air molecules disassociate and form plasma (a cloud of charged particles in any combination of ions or electrons – further details not covered[13]).
    This plasma-laden air flow blocks the radio frequencies – the medium of communication and connectivity with the hypersonic vehicle.
  • Honing the technologies for precise navigation and positioning of a vehicle zooming in at Mach 6+ so as to ensure that blast radius of the nuclear warhead is positioned where it is intended or the conventional weapons takes out the intended target ‘precisely’. This is a tall order.
  • Managing track mobility of the vehicle precisely as slightest manoeuvres at such speeds cause the vehicle to withstand tremendous structural and aerodynamic loads.
  • Miniaturisation and ruggedisation of precision electronic equipment to conform to the size and weight limitations, as also, to be able to operate at the temperatures generated.
  • Aerodynamic configuration of the HGV itself. The vehicle has no room for wings, lifting surfaces and a limited space for warhead carriage.
  • Another major challenge is to build a seamless kill-chain by integrating the hypersonic vehicle to communicate with tanks/ships/aircrafts of the battlefield in real time. This is a very tall order.
- And finally, it is not only the hypersonic vehicle alone, a comprehensive capability will call for the following :-

  • A global look-see capability (external + on board) to propel the warhead to its intended target all the way across the globe.
  • Communications and connectivity with a body moving at many a Mach speed.
  • Target acquisition capability.
  • Battle management, missile guidance and control mechanisms.
That we are moving from one test to the other is good news. For the naysayers – that we are moving FROM FAILURES TOWARDS THE ULTIMATE SUCCESS IS ALSO GOOD NEWS INDEED.

 
Not heavily related but relevant somewhat. As I suspect the three barriers ahead are the main working scramjet motor, simulation & guidance (specially how to solve the comm blackout part) , and the third is suitable materials withstanding very high temperature. First one we are working on, 2nd one we are doing collab with Rus, the 3rd will be the reason for delays.

Russia could offer hypersonic missile technologies to friendly countries says official​


According to Konstantin Biryulin, the Deputy General Director of KTRV, the Tactical Missile Weapons Corporation (KTRV), which is responsible for developing hypersonic missiles in Russia, does not rule out the possibility of passing on hypersonic technologies to friendly nations if an appropriate political decision is made.

The question is whether Russia is prepared to pass these new technologies to its friends, people who are both friends and true partners, is a political choice, he said. If such a decision is made, Biryulin believes KTRV can transfer this technology. Biryulin was responding to a related query to Ria Novosti.

He referred to the joint Russian-Indian venture for developing and producing the Brahmos family of supersonic missiles. He stated that the Indian partners “had delved fairly thoroughly into this area.”

They have a separate programme that is coordinated with Russia, said Biryulin.

The deputy general director of NPO Mashinostroeniya and co-director of the Brahmos joint ventureAlexander Maksichev, from the Russian side, stated in an interview with RIA Novosti in August 2022 that the creation of the Brahmos hypersonic missile can be expected around 2027-2028. NPO Mashinostroeniya manufactures zircon hypersonic missiles and is a part of KTRV.

The Tactical Missiles Company, founded in 2002 on the foundation of the State Research and Production Center Zvezda-Strela, comprises a variety of firms that manufacture high-performance missiles, guided bombs, and air, ground, and sea-based weapon systems. It is the Russian military-industrial complex’s primary holding, specialising in developing hypersonic weaponry.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Ashwin