Indian Missile Transporter Erectors and Launchers (TEL)

paradox sir said Prime, I thought this was a bit slimmer for prime sized missile ie load rating would be less. We do not have full clear view of any prime TEL yet right?

EDIT:
On second thought, maybe right, after all electro pneumatics did make the prime testing related stuff, maybe not the canister, but the mechanical erector part. resting fixture like they call it. ANI view of the prime test and the tel in shadow

1702575849168.png

https://twitter.com/x/status/1735321101972939156
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ShiroBarks, Aditya b7777 and Rajput Lion
1740137285142.png

GkTkdAFX0AASWyK
 
  • Like
Reactions: ShiroBarks, Aditya b7777 and YoungWolf
Can someone help me understand why the indian army version of Akash is installed on T72 instead of a wheeled system like Airforce?

Is army expecting to use Akash along with its expedition forces? My understanding was that QRSAM was meant to be used by advancing forces, and Akash is primarily meant for protection of stationary targets.
So why does it need a tracked platform?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom