Islamic Republic of Iran

No. All stakeholders were not involved. The Chagossians are still claiming they are not involved, although Mauritius was. But this is colonization. India's case is about freedom.
The people of Kashmir were not involved either.
If we really argue along your point, then India should never have been partitioned because the Brits made the rules with the intention of balkanizing India, which failed partially. What didn't work out for Pakistan and Britain is the rule supposed to help them in turn benefitted India because Pakistan was foolish enough to invade Kashmir, and they did it with the support of the British. And the Indian side used the same British laws of accession against Pakistan and Britain.
India was never not balkanised before Britain came.
Lol.



Lol.
Lol facts.
The Cholas invaded SE Asia because the kingdoms there cut off the trade route between India and China. Once again, we didn't start the fire.
The Cholas were slave-trading pirates, there are no excuses for them.
We have the cleanest history in the world. We had a proper Hindu-based democratic society that did not have slavery or kill anyone en masse for thousands of years until the arrival of Islam.
BS:
Read what Megasthenes has to say about India.
Read what history says instead of making it up.
And guess what, we, at least the Hindus in India, follow pretty much the same customs as before.

The leftists in India are so screwed up, they don't even try to report India's true history. While india was growing, the Chinese were busy killing each other.


This video clearly indicates why India was number 1. Compare that to how f*cked up China was. And look at the period during British rule and what independence did for India. The British make Hitler, Mao and Stalin look like chumps.
If that were the case you'd all be dead.
We had Islamic rule, followed by British rule, followed by leftist rule. Now that Hindus are back in power, almost, if this stays, we will go back to being the greatest. The world will find peace and prosperity as long as Hindus rule India. So, no, we didn't start the fire. We are people who douse the fire.
The Cholas weren't dousing any fires, neither were the Guptas:

History lessons in India must be a work of creative writing.
 
The people of Kashmir were not involved either.

Exactly. So British Raj should never have been partitioned.

If we do things China style, the Indian map would have a lot more territory than you can imagine.

India was never not balkanised before Britain came.

Sure. So was China.

The Cholas were slave-trading pirates, there are no excuses for them.

After trade routes were closed.

BS:

That's not slavery. That's a dasa system, or indentured laborer. Basically prisoners doing penal labor, or victims of loan sharks. For example, if you get caught doing petty crime, you can escape prison time by becoming a servant to any important guy who vouches for you and pays the bail. And there were rules on how you treated them. For example, you get a woman pregnant, she earns her freedom. If she has a daughter, you become responsible for her, and a son gets a share in the inheritance of equal value as other legitimate sons.

India never had mass slavery, slave labor or a market that bought and sold slaves.

It's the West that decided "dasa" means slave. But then they are idiots.

Read what history says instead of making it up.

Lol.

If that were the case you'd all be dead.

Barely survived after 1947. 5% literacy rate, 80% poverty, life expectancy of 32 years.

The Cholas weren't dousing any fires, neither were the Guptas:

History lessons in India must be a work of creative writing.

Looks like it was written by a lefty for idiots.

Anyway, yeah, that was the economy of the number 1 country in the world at the time.
 
Exactly. So British Raj should never have been partitioned.
They should have put it back as it was pre-British Raj:

1728742503300.png

If we do things China style, the Indian map would have a lot more territory than you can imagine.
You mean 'BS' style?
Sure. So was China.
1728742692859.png

After trade routes were closed.
The Cholas hijacked the trade routes FFS. JFC, you don't even teach history at all over there do you?
That's not slavery. That's a dasa system, or indentured laborer. Basically prisoners doing penal labor, or victims of loan sharks. For example, if you get caught doing petty crime, you can escape prison time by becoming a servant to any important guy who vouches for you and pays the bail. And there were rules on how you treated them. For example, you get a woman pregnant, she earns her freedom. If she has a daughter, you become responsible for her, and a son gets a share in the inheritance of equal value as other legitimate sons.

India never had mass slavery, slave labor or a market that bought and sold slaves.

It's the West that decided "dasa" means slave. But then they are idiots.
How the f*ck did you read those links and come up with that reply? You had slaves in your empires deal with it. You weren't perfect either. Your history lessons are completely f*cked, you whitewash all your own wrongs and exaggerate all the wrongs of Britain by a factor of a thousand.
Yeah, read history instead of making it up and whitewashing your own crimes. At least we got taught about our own crimes in our history lessons, you just whitewash all yours.
Barely survived after 1947. 5% literacy rate, 80% poverty, life expectancy of 32 years.
Yet a higher GDP than China with half the population. :ROFLMAO: You still only have a 69% literacy rate for women and you still had 35% living in povert even in 2010 and you still have 7,000/day dying of malnutrition. Don't blame Britain for all your failings. Imagine if you wereleft to squabble it out with the borders you had as per late 18th century - see above? That would have been fun to watch. You'd have killed each other far more than the British did long before reaching the borders you have today.
1728743120720.png

Looks like it was written by a lefty for idiots.

Anyway, yeah, that was the economy of the number 1 country in the world at the time.
Who ran slaves same as the number 1 country in 1850.
 
They should have put it back as it was pre-British Raj:

View attachment 37112

They are all Indians today.

More accurate:
1.jpg


The Cholas hijacked the trade routes FFS. JFC, you don't even teach history at all over there do you?

Why would they do that?

SEA kingdoms were like the Houthis today. Imagine India or the US invading Yemen to free up the Red Sea.

How the f*ck did you read those links and come up with that reply? You had slaves in your empires deal with it. You weren't perfect either. Your history lessons are completely f*cked, you whitewash all your own wrongs and exaggerate all the wrongs of Britain by a factor of a thousand.

Yeah, read history instead of making it up and whitewashing your own crimes. At least we got taught about our own crimes in our history lessons, you just whitewash all yours.

Stay busy revising history.

The people who saw it in person have this to say:
A law, prescribed by ancient Indian philosophers, bans slavery. The law treats everyone equally, but allows the property to be unevenly distributed.

Yet a higher GDP than China with half the population. :ROFLMAO:You still only have a 69% literacy rate for women and you still had 35% living in povert even in 2010 and you still have 7,000/day dying of malnutrition. Don't blame Britain for all your failings. Imagine if you wereleft to squabble it out with the borders you had as per late 18th century - see above? That would have been fun to watch. You'd have killed each other far more than the British did long before reaching the borders you have today.

View attachment 37115

You mean all the fake GDP numbers of the British Raj?
 
They are all Indians today.

More accurate:
View attachment 37118
How is 265 BCE more accurate? Slaves again too.

Why would they do that?

SEA kingdoms were like the Houthis today. Imagine India or the US invading Yemen to free up the Red Sea.
Dude you invaded the entire Indian Ocean. Stop making crap excuses.
Stay busy revising history.

The people who saw it in person have this to say:
A law, prescribed by ancient Indian philosophers, bans slavery. The law treats everyone equally, but allows the property to be unevenly distributed.
An artifact you paid no attention to in your doings.
You mean all the fake GDP numbers of the British Raj?
No, all real numbers, presented against a fake case.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Shaktimaan
How is 265 BCE more accurate? Slaves again too.


Dude you invaded the entire Indian Ocean. Stop making crap excuses.

An artifact you paid no attention to in your doings.

No, all real numbers, presented against a fake case.

You are following in the footsteps of your forefathers in revising Indian history.
 
Guess they have not decided yet. This could be the start of an all-out war after all.

Oh they have already decided what they wanna do way before blowing up the pagers.

I feel they are just wearing iranians out, and probably have a no of pre requisite steps before the actual blow.
 
Oh they have already decided what they wanna do way before blowing up the pagers.

I feel they are just wearing iranians out, and probably have a no of pre requisite steps before the actual blow.

I agree. I think it's more centered around how to deal with the global blowback or how to push Iran and the US to a point where both end up having to fight each other.

Israel attacking a pre-nuclear Iran was a long time coming.

What do you think we are gonna do, apart from brace for very high oil prices?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Paro
You are following in the footsteps of your forefathers in revising Indian history.
No, this is Indian history seen by all outside of India. You are the ones revising your history to whitewash it so that you can pretend to be the victim who was never the victimiser. The reality is that you were both at different times.
 
You are the ones revising your history to whitewash it

If that's supposed to happen, then it's yet to happen.

I even posted the link to Indica, written by a Greek historian.

Anyway, if Iran gets nukes, be prepared to fend off Iranian IRBMs in the near future.
 
If that's supposed to happen, then it's yet to happen.

I even posted the link to Indica, written by a Greek historian.

Anyway, if Iran gets nukes, be prepared to fend off Iranian IRBMs in the near future.
I posted several links saying how 3 of your own empires, who conquered territory outside India used slaves.

If Iran uses a single nuke it will cease to exist.
 
I posted several links saying how 3 of your own empires, who conquered territory outside India used slaves.

Slaves who can inherit property from their "master" or are given "freedom" if they become victims of human rights abuse?

Anyway, you have mostly given examples of the post-Islamic era. The Chola Empire is just 1000 years old. The invasion of Indonesia happened in the 11th century.

If Iran uses a single nuke it will cease to exist.

Um... Sure. But you can bet they will use that nuke after they have inducted a lot of nuke-tipped MRBMs and IRBMs.

Distance between Iran and any part of Europe is considerably less than 5000 km. It's for political reasons that they have "officially" restricted themselves to sub-2000 km range.

North Korea helped develop Iran's missile tech via Pakistan's nuclear black market network. You can bet they will help them develop even ICBMs in time. The borderline IRBM called Khorramshahr is basically NoKo's Musudan and is said to have a range above 2500 km and closer to 4000 km.

The problem for Europe is this is the first time you are being threatened by a rogue power, not an established power.
 
Slaves who can inherit property from their "master" or are given "freedom" if they become victims of human rights abuse?

Slavery was prevalent in Chola society and slaves were imported.

You are still leading the world in slavery even today:


The 10 countries with the largest estimated numbersof people in modern slavery include some of theworld’s most populous. Collectively, these countries— India (11 million), China (5.8 million), North Korea(2.7 million), Pakistan (2.3 million), Russia (1.9million), Indonesia (1.8 million), Nigeria (1.6 million),Türkiye (1.3 million), Bangladesh (1.2 million), andthe United States (1.1 million)

Since 2018 you've actually increased:
1728931450598.png


Anyway, you have mostly given examples of the post-Islamic era. The Chola Empire is just 1000 years old. The invasion of Indonesia happened in the 11th century.
Yep, and you ran slaves then.

Also:


Slavery was very much prevalent during the Gupta period. It was a common feature among most Hindu households.

It existed everywhere in the world so don't be too hard on yourself but also don't pretend the Europeans or British invented it.
Um... Sure. But you can bet they will use that nuke after they have inducted a lot of nuke-tipped MRBMs and IRBMs.

Distance between Iran and any part of Europe is considerably less than 5000 km. It's for political reasons that they have "officially" restricted themselves to sub-2000 km range.

North Korea helped develop Iran's missile tech via Pakistan's nuclear black market network. You can bet they will help them develop even ICBMs in time. The borderline IRBM called Khorramshahr is basically NoKo's Musudan and is said to have a range above 2500 km and closer to 4000 km.

The problem for Europe is this is the first time you are being threatened by a rogue power, not an established power.
They'll never have enough nukes to pose a serious threat and by then the means will exist to shoot them down from space. They would also be very vulnerable to a pre-emptive strike if they get too threateny.
 
Anyway, if Iran gets nukes, be prepared to fend off Iranian IRBMs in the near future.
Its not the IRBMS, its just they cannot attack iran directly. Once they have nukes iran like west can use proxies without any fear of retaliation. If things go south , then there is the possibility of dirty bomb.
 



You are still leading the world in slavery even today:




Since 2018 you've actually increased:
View attachment 37171


Yep, and you ran slaves then.

Also:




It existed everywhere in the world so don't be too hard on yourself but also don't pretend the Europeans or British invented it.

As I said, you are reinventing history.

Find me an example of a slave market in India before Islam.

They'll never have enough nukes to pose a serious threat and by then the means will exist to shoot them down from space. They would also be very vulnerable to a pre-emptive strike if they get too threateny.

NoKo is getting to that point, they are expected to have 100 nukes already, and at least 200+ by 2030.

Iran's far richer in comparison, and their overall civilian and military industries are far more advanced than NoKo's.
 
As I said, you are reinventing history.

Find me an example of a slave market in India before Islam.
Nope, you are whitewashing your own history.

Already have done. Gupta Empire had slaves before Islam was even invented.
NoKo is getting to that point, they are expected to have 100 nukes already, and at least 200+ by 2030.
Which would mostly get taken out and then NK would be completely wiped from history.
Iran's far richer in comparison, and their overall civilian and military industries are far more advanced than NoKo's.
Their missiles aren't.