Islamic Republic of Pakistan : News, Discussions & Updates
- Thread starter Butter Chicken
- Start date
Thats why i jave posted here now, a lot of changes has happened already.
He may be local type politician, but he had hell lot of support from pakistan.
Both belong to same ‘New Muslim Block’ which believe it PAKAGES.
Both demand Big Pakages from their donors, former is from US,EU Germany, Qotar and the later from KSA,UAE,US and China
I doubt it.
Waving "Hai" to Israel means waving "Bye" to Kashmir issue for pakistan
They would not accept Israel as a nation and any siding with Israel means, collateral damage.
Last edited:
Neither.
He is from Dera Ismail khan where ethnic lines are blurred.
There People are tri-lingual.
Speak Pushto which is a language of Pushtoons.
Saraiki which is a language of Baloch tribes who settled among Punjabi tribes during the tribal wars of Balochistan.
Hindko, which is my native language.
So these people speak all the above three languages and are a mix of Pushtoon, Punjabi and Baloch.
[/QUOTE]
They get PAKAGES when they are going to DARKAGES. Ironically BD has good amount of foreign reserves now, IK can save the country by claiming alimony from hasina for 1971 divorce.
It's much more central to Pakistani Punjab and Balochistan, than Sindh & Pashtoon area. Demographic & language impact should have been on these lines. As I understand, it's gateway to Balochistan province for people coming from areas south of Islamabad.
Looks like Paxtan and KSA are about to become bitter enemies.
Snubbed by MBS, Pakistan colludes with his rivals in House of Saud
Sources said that having been rebuffed by MBS, Islamabad engaged diplomatic channels to reach out to his rivals within the Saudi royal family who wish to supplant him.
The anti-MBS faction in the House of Saud, recently declared their support for King Salman’s brother Prince Ahmed and urged him to lead the country.
Sources said that Pakistan is now backing the Prince Ahmed faction in the Saudi royal family. However, 34-year-old MBS, as of today, continues to enjoy the support of the Saudi Army and intelligence besides the backing of the US President Donald Trump, sources said.
Snubbed by MBS, Pakistan colludes with his rivals in House of Saud
Sources said that having been rebuffed by MBS, Islamabad engaged diplomatic channels to reach out to his rivals within the Saudi royal family who wish to supplant him.
The anti-MBS faction in the House of Saud, recently declared their support for King Salman’s brother Prince Ahmed and urged him to lead the country.
Sources said that Pakistan is now backing the Prince Ahmed faction in the Saudi royal family. However, 34-year-old MBS, as of today, continues to enjoy the support of the Saudi Army and intelligence besides the backing of the US President Donald Trump, sources said.
Looks like the qibla has shifted east. Itna toh raqat padte waqt bhi pak fauji nahin jhukte. @safriz
With Tech Aid, India Threatens to Expose Pak Bid to Mislead Int'l Community on Dawood Ibrahim
India has threatened to expose Pakistan at the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) for misleading the international community on terrorists Dawood Ibrahim and Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi.
Following up on their claim that Pakistan's 2015 and 2019 statutory resolution mentioning Ibrahim, India’s most-wanted terrorist, were "back-dated lies," Indian agencies have used technology to establish that all these documents of 2015 and 2019 were uploaded in 2020 and the move is only an attempt by the neighbouring nation to save face. "All our URL search shows the documents did not exist before 2020. They were all uploaded in 2020," an official said.
Pakistan in its statutory resolution of August 18, 2020, had for the first time accepted that Ibrahim, the perpetrator of the 1993 Mumbai blasts, lived in Karachi, Pakistan.
However, a Pakistan Foreign Office statement called this routine. "The consolidated SROs are issued periodically as a routine matter. Similar SROs have been issued by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in the past, as per statutory requirements and to meet our international obligations. Last such SROs were issued in 2019," the Pakistan Foreign Ministry said in a said.
It added, "The assertions made by some sections of the Indian media, as to Pakistan admitting to the presence of certain listed individuals on its territory, based on the information contained in the SRO, is baseless and misleading. "
However, Indian agencies say that reverse search of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ URL conclusively exposes the misleading claim of Pakistan.
"These are all MOFA URLs. How will they deny this?" an official said. He, however, conceded that Pakistan can argue to save face that resolutions were passed in 2015 and 2019, but put on the website later.
To counter any such claim, Indian agencies point out that Interpol, UN and other international organisation links that the statutory resolution shares also exposes Pakistan. For example, the SRO from December 22, 2015, to January 16, 2020, had a reference to ‘2020/01’ in their URLs. "If a resolution was passed in 2015, how can it have a link of 2020 in it for reference," another said.
www.news18.com
India has threatened to expose Pakistan at the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) for misleading the international community on terrorists Dawood Ibrahim and Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi.
Following up on their claim that Pakistan's 2015 and 2019 statutory resolution mentioning Ibrahim, India’s most-wanted terrorist, were "back-dated lies," Indian agencies have used technology to establish that all these documents of 2015 and 2019 were uploaded in 2020 and the move is only an attempt by the neighbouring nation to save face. "All our URL search shows the documents did not exist before 2020. They were all uploaded in 2020," an official said.
Pakistan in its statutory resolution of August 18, 2020, had for the first time accepted that Ibrahim, the perpetrator of the 1993 Mumbai blasts, lived in Karachi, Pakistan.
However, a Pakistan Foreign Office statement called this routine. "The consolidated SROs are issued periodically as a routine matter. Similar SROs have been issued by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in the past, as per statutory requirements and to meet our international obligations. Last such SROs were issued in 2019," the Pakistan Foreign Ministry said in a said.
It added, "The assertions made by some sections of the Indian media, as to Pakistan admitting to the presence of certain listed individuals on its territory, based on the information contained in the SRO, is baseless and misleading. "
However, Indian agencies say that reverse search of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ URL conclusively exposes the misleading claim of Pakistan.
"These are all MOFA URLs. How will they deny this?" an official said. He, however, conceded that Pakistan can argue to save face that resolutions were passed in 2015 and 2019, but put on the website later.
To counter any such claim, Indian agencies point out that Interpol, UN and other international organisation links that the statutory resolution shares also exposes Pakistan. For example, the SRO from December 22, 2015, to January 16, 2020, had a reference to ‘2020/01’ in their URLs. "If a resolution was passed in 2015, how can it have a link of 2020 in it for reference," another said.
With Tech Aid, India Threatens to Expose Pak Bid to Mislead Int'l Community on Dawood Ibrahim - News18
Indian agencies have used technology to establish that Pakistan's 2015 and 2019 statutory resolution mentioning Dawood Ibrahim were uploaded in 2020 and the move is only meant to save face.
www.news18.com
Well it only strengthens the assertion that Pakistan is managed by Paindus from PunjabWith Tech Aid, India Threatens to Expose Pak Bid to Mislead Int'l Community on Dawood Ibrahim
India has threatened to expose Pakistan at the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) for misleading the international community on terrorists Dawood Ibrahim and Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi.
Following up on their claim that Pakistan's 2015 and 2019 statutory resolution mentioning Ibrahim, India’s most-wanted terrorist, were "back-dated lies," Indian agencies have used technology to establish that all these documents of 2015 and 2019 were uploaded in 2020 and the move is only an attempt by the neighbouring nation to save face. "All our URL search shows the documents did not exist before 2020. They were all uploaded in 2020," an official said.
Pakistan in its statutory resolution of August 18, 2020, had for the first time accepted that Ibrahim, the perpetrator of the 1993 Mumbai blasts, lived in Karachi, Pakistan.
However, a Pakistan Foreign Office statement called this routine. "The consolidated SROs are issued periodically as a routine matter. Similar SROs have been issued by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in the past, as per statutory requirements and to meet our international obligations. Last such SROs were issued in 2019," the Pakistan Foreign Ministry said in a said.
It added, "The assertions made by some sections of the Indian media, as to Pakistan admitting to the presence of certain listed individuals on its territory, based on the information contained in the SRO, is baseless and misleading. "
However, Indian agencies say that reverse search of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ URL conclusively exposes the misleading claim of Pakistan.
"These are all MOFA URLs. How will they deny this?" an official said. He, however, conceded that Pakistan can argue to save face that resolutions were passed in 2015 and 2019, but put on the website later.
To counter any such claim, Indian agencies point out that Interpol, UN and other international organisation links that the statutory resolution shares also exposes Pakistan. For example, the SRO from December 22, 2015, to January 16, 2020, had a reference to ‘2020/01’ in their URLs. "If a resolution was passed in 2015, how can it have a link of 2020 in it for reference," another said.
With Tech Aid, India Threatens to Expose Pak Bid to Mislead Int'l Community on Dawood Ibrahim - News18
Indian agencies have used technology to establish that Pakistan's 2015 and 2019 statutory resolution mentioning Dawood Ibrahim were uploaded in 2020 and the move is only meant to save face.
