www.twz.com
Do yourself a favour & watch all his videos or as many as you can & if possible report your findings here & we shall discuss the issue threadbare.
Again not trying to argue but you were calling him a conman and such, I've watched some parts of some of his videos and he came across as thoughtful lecturer using historical patterns. So since you were calling him out as a conman, please let us know specifically about some quotes, examples etc which would warrant him as such. Broad claims about all Chinese-Canadians being infiltrated don't really hold up without evidence, and I'm genuinely curious what convinced you. No rush, happy to hear your take!
I'd once again urge you to completely disregard whatever I've put out there & encourage you to make up your own mind using your critical skills to arrive at a decision after perusing as many videos as you can of that eminent historian & report your findings here .
Thanks for the nudge and for keeping it open, I get you're encouraging me to dig in independently, which is fair. That said, I’m not going to binge dozens of hours just to maybe spot something suspicious; I’d rather have a real discussion based on actual points. If there are specific videos, claims, timestamps, or patterns in his content that make you see him as a “Han con man” or CCP-linked operative (beyond just his Chinese-Canadian background), please share one or two concrete examples. That way we can look at the same thing and actually talk it through properly. Accusations like that carry weight and deserve specifics, not just “watch everything and you’ll see.” I’m genuinely open to being convinced with evidence, so hit me with whatever stood out most to you. No rush, looking forward to your take.
Au contraire it's important to view his entire ouevre in order for you to arrive at a well rounded decision. We don't want to make the same mistakes I did , do we ?
