ISRO Small Satellite Launch vehicle (SSLV) : Updates

Sathya said:
Last few years ISRO is facing some trouble..
Doesn't seem usual.
Click to expand...
The technical faults are supposed to happen and that will help us grow. We have the required skilled manpower for that.

More worried about the administration or the way things are run.

I hope to see DRDO come up with a launch solution for Armed Forces.

Fingers crossed
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hydra and Chain Smoker
Yet another setback for ISRO. These men start to fail if a liquid propellant is involved; this is their flaw. The GSLV MK2 is the same way failed many times. As per the plan, the Velocity-Trimming Module (VTM) wasn't performed. SCE 200 is still a complete mystery to us. With their ICBMs, DRDO could accomplish the same thing.

1659862378494.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ankit Kumar and Ashwin
TARGET said:
Yet another setback for ISRO. These men start to fail if a liquid propellant is involved; this is their flaw. The GSLV MK2 is the same way failed many times. As per the plan, the Velocity-Trimming Module (VTM) wasn't performed. SCE 200 is still a complete mystery to us. With their ICBMs, DRDO could accomplish the same thing.

View attachment 24232
Click to expand...
Loss of telemetry is also a failure.

I am not angry at the failure, it is bound to happen. I am angry about the excessively slow rate of work they are doing now.

From innovation going towards the good old PSU way ? Sarkari Naukri?
 
Ankit Kumar said:
Loss of telemetry is also a failure.

I am not angry at the failure, it is bound to happen. I am angry about the excessively slow rate of work they are doing now.

From innovation going towards the good old PSU way ? Sarkari Naukri?
Click to expand...
Agree If you see SPACEX failures, then this is nothing. The issue is PUC's inability to work extra hours. I think this man, "S.Somnath," will do the needful. It seems to have already been planned for the next launch, SSLV-D2. Liquid propulsion 1 div should be created in HYD. We need a LOX methane engine.

Statement by Chairman, ISRO - ISRO
 
Last edited:
TARGET said:
Agree If you see SPACEX failures, then this is nothing. The issue is PUC's inability to work extra hours. I think this man, "S.Somnath," will do the needful. It seems to have already been planned for the next launch, SSLV-D2. Liquid propulsion 1 div should be created in HYD. We need a LOX methane engine.

Statement by Chairman, ISRO - ISRO
Click to expand...
I hope things improve. But right now it's pathetic.
 
TARGET said:
Yet another setback for ISRO. These men start to fail if a liquid propellant is involved; this is their flaw. The GSLV MK2 is the same way failed many times. As per the plan, the Velocity-Trimming Module (VTM) wasn't performed. SCE 200 is still a complete mystery to us. With their ICBMs, DRDO could accomplish the same thing.

View attachment 24232
Click to expand...
probably our boys are working in silos and dont want to give away their turf. I bet ISRO needs some fresh infusion of ideas & ppl from other organizations.
 
jetray said:
probably our boys are working in silos and dont want to give away their turf. I bet ISRO needs some fresh infusion of ideas & ppl from other organizations.
Click to expand...
Given ISRO's track record of both successful and unsuccessful launches, ISRO must have brilliant minds. They do have experts that can offer a different, workable answer. However, they do have issues with the production capacity, which is getting privatized, and I think we need a new division to concentrate on LOX and methane engines. We need sufficient funds to build a state-of-the-art test facility since developing liquid rocket motors is a lengthy process. As well as some support from other countries, we need academics who can work with businesses.
 
Rocket Lab Try To Catch An Electron Rocket With A Helicopter!
It seems to be a simple idea for a reusable rocket, but there has been no success from Rocket Lab.

 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom