Kashmir : Counter Terror Operation Updates and Discussions

Gangwar between 2 Jihadi groups , 1 jihadi killed
Nice, this adds a new dimension to the already complex relations between different militant outfits in the valley. We can recall the brawl of ideologies between Hizbul and the recently killed Zakir Musa. What this does is that it prevents consolidation between multiple outfits, which strengthens them. Also we have seen instances of one militant outfit giving actionable intelligence about other outfits to the security forces.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deathstar
Nice, this adds a new dimension to the already complex relations between different militant outfits in the valley. We can recall the brawl of ideologies between Hizbul and the recently killed Zakir Musa. What this does is that it prevents consolidation between multiple outfits, which strengthens them. Also we have seen instances of one militant outfit giving actionable intelligence about other outfits to the security forces.
There are some militant groups backed by Pakistan , some act independently and some with affiliation to ISIS atleast inspired and some work for Kashmir as independent country , these fights are bound to happen. After all in the end money is what matters
 
After all in the end money is what matters
True. Be that as it may, killing each other only feeds the animosity. There is a constant and sometimes competition between these groups to show that they are more pious muslims that the rest. Shooting each other will not improve relations, if anything now each outfit will have multiple mortal enemies excluding the Army.
Curious how money and influence is more important then the chumma of the ummah.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deathstar
There are some militant groups backed by Pakistan , some act independently and some with affiliation to ISIS atleast inspired and some work for Kashmir as independent country , these fights are bound to happen. After all in the end money is what matters
Not like that, no independent or Kashmir liberation or IS group exists, all operate from blessings of Pakistan and direct control of ISI. Some group may try to exist with blessings from Indian security agencies but that too don't end well. Whenever someone tries to be independent this is what happens. Nobody really believe that they will get independence or they even need it, when some of them chant anti India slogans it's either because of anger or they just want to poke you.

Independent groups are dangerous, can take away control from hands of both nations and therefore nipped in the bud. Similarly no terror group in Pakistani Punjab exists that is not completely under control of Pakistan.

Recently one religious group became too big and went of control and choked Pakistan in name of Blasphemy, few months later when everyone was distracted the crippled leader was quietly shoved into jail and was kept there till he surrendered and expelled everyone that bad mouthed army.

Most nations may favor organic growth of insurgency, Pakistan don't, they are control freak and control everything by stacking up terrorist groups with their own men.
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: jetray and Sathya
Modi changed the situation in Kashmir in just 5 years , 5 years more and these people will beg for mercy. Amit Shah wont hesitate to get his hands dirty
 
Mere rhetoric or something brewing ?

Article 370 only temporary provision, not permanent: Amit Shah

Scrapping Article 370 of the Constitution has been one of the pet issues that have repeatedly been mentioned in BJP's election manifestos.

New Delhi, June 28, 2019, UPDATED : June 28, 2019, 17:15 IST
amit_shah_facebook.jpeg

Union Home Minister Amit Shah. (Photo: Facebook/AmitShah)

HIGHLIGHTS
  • Home Minister Amit Shah was speaking in the Lok Sabha
  • He said this during a debate on extension of President's rule in J&K
  • Lok Sabha has passed a bill to extend President's rule by 6 months
Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Wednesday said Article 370 of the Constitution that gives special status to Jammu and Kashmir is only a temporary provision and not a permanent one. He said this in the Lok Sabha.

He was responding to the Opposition's argument that Jammu and Kashmir can't be treated like other states because Article 370 gives it a special status. To this, Amit Shah said one must remember that Article 370 of the Constitution is "temporary in nature" and "not permanent".

Scrapping Article 370 of the Constitution has been one of the pet issues that have repeatedly been mentioned in BJP's election manifestos.

Shah was participating in a debate to extend the President's rule in Jammu and Kashmir. Later, the House passed the Jammu and Kashmir Reservation (Amendment) Bill, 2019, to replace an ordinance issued by the previous government.

In his speech, Amit Shah also said that assembly elections in Jammu and Kashmir will be held in a democratic, free and fair manner as soon as the Election Commission announces the dates.

People living along the International Border (IB) in Jammu and Kashmir will get benefits of reservation in direct recruitment, promotion and admission in professional courses on par with those living along the Actual Line of Control (ALoC), according to the bill.

Replying to the statutory resolution seeking extension of President's Rule in the state, and the amendment bill, Amit Shah asserted that the Modi government has 'zero tolerance' policy towards terrorism and its ideology is to ensure protection of borders and make the country free of terrorism.

He said the government has spent Rs 2,307 crore to upgrade security apparatus in the state.

Hitting out at the Congress and the then prime minister Jawaharlal Nehru, he said one-third of Jammu and Kashmir is not with India.

"Who is responsible," he asked drawing a sharp reaction from the Congress members.

Continuing his attack on the opposition party, he said so far Article 356 (President's Rule) was imposed 132 times all over the country, of which the Congress used it 93 times to dismiss state governments.

The Home Minister also said the government withdrew security of 919 people in the state as there was no security threat for them.

Shah said people speak against India in Jammu and Kashmir to get security cover. In fact, he said, people who speak for India face the real threat.

(With inputs from PTI)

Article 370 only temporary provision, not permanent: Amit Shah
 
Why PM Modi’s victory made Gilgit-Baltistan happy

by Senge Hasnan Sering, Updated : June 29, 2019, 7:54 PM

senge.jpg



A smooth sailing for the Bharatiya Janata Party is in the offing after the parliamentary elections, as Indians have awarded their ruling party a second term with a sweeping mandate. The length and breadth of BJP’s vote share confirms the party breaking many stereotypes to claim a convincing victory. The voting pattern shows that despite being called a “Hindu nationalist” party, a large majority of voters in Muslim, Maoist and Adivasi dominated constituencies preferred BJP over its main competitor, the Indian National Congress. The BJP received its largest vote share from both rural and underprivileged areas of the country, and thus shed its label as a party of mercantile and urban interests.

The linchpin of BJP’s election manifesto projected an uncompromising attitude towards national security, with a focus on terrorism, border security and Kashmir. The election results prove that the BJP did not have to work too hard to convince the voters that national security was pivotal to sustain the pace and direction of both economic growth and cultural preservation. BJP’s security doctrine is guided by the belief that there is no challenge more daunting than collusion of Pakistan and China to encircle and contain India, and that the convergence as well as leverage point for both nations is Gilgit-Baltistan (POK—Pakistan Occupied Kashmir).

With a fresh look at the security paradigm, the ruling party spent the last five years exposing Pakistan and China for their onslaught on the land, resources and the people of Gilgit-Baltistan, and asked both to withdraw immediately from POK, which is an integral part of Jammu & Kashmir. BJP prescribes to the view that Pakistan’s motivation as well as successes in executing terror activities in the Indian state of Jammu & Kashmir hinge on control over POK. Further, Pakistan’s presence in POK also enables China to commit a long term military footprint in the Persian Gulf and the Indian Ocean Region, which is coming at India’s cost. The newly appointed Defence Minister, Rajnath Singh, by making his maiden official visit to Siachen glacier, confirms the adherence to this conviction.

One will hardly hear the people of Gilgit-Baltistan say it aloud, however, BJP’s successes against Pakistan-sponsored terrorists are a source of relief for them too, since these terrorists are not just against India, but they also target and kill the Shias, Sufis and Ismailis of Gilgit-Baltistan. They damage the social fabric by violating cultural and religious practices and institutions. The people of Gilgit-Baltistan are unhappy that the Pakistani military encourages these terrorists to interfere in local political affairs and enables them to exploit resources to sustain such activities. Religious polarisation between Shias and Sunnis has made Gilgit-Baltistan a hub for terrorist recruitment and training, and locals detest their land being used against Ladakh or Kashmir. The locals remind Pakistani rulers that the people living on both sides of Line of Control share the same ethnic and religious makeup and they do not approve of violence as a means to solve the Kashmir issue. Those who witnessed the Kargil War still narrate how Pakistani incursions damaged the economic wellbeing of the region and how the destruction to mosques, khanqahs and imambargahs in Ladakh caused emotional pain to the region’s Balti community.

BJP advocates the reunion of Gilgit-Baltistan with India, which will help the natives enjoy citizenship rights in a Constitutional set-up like their kin in Ladakh. This view was well received by the Ladakhi Muslims and helped BJP expand its vote bank. According to Zulikha Bano, a Balti activist from the Nubra valley in Leh district, more than 40% of Muslim voters in Nubra supported BJP’s Jamyang T. Namgyal—which is the highest Muslim vote share for any BJP candidate. Zulikha claims that villages such as Chulungkha, Tyakshi and Turtuk, with a Balti population, voted for the BJP since the latter backs opening the Nubra-Chorbat (Chorbat valley is in Gilgit-Baltistan) road to revive commerce across the Line of Control and ease communication between members of the divided families. Zulikha states that the local Baltis also praise BJP for declaring their villages “tourist-accessible”, which has enhanced local business and livelihood prospects.

The Kargil based Mohammad Hassan Pasha, who is the vice president of Jammu & Kashmir BJP Yuva Morcha (Youth Front), feels that the prejudice against BJP is giving way to rational thinking, and support for Prime Minister Narendra Modi is growing among the youth of Kargil. He said that the Baltis appreciate BJP’s decision to establish the university and a separate administrative division for Ladakh. According to Pasha, more than one-quarter of Ladakhi Muslims supported BJP during the current elections, which was a significant change.

The establishment of a separate Ladakh division has also renewed hopes in the Zanskar valley, where people have placed their trust in the BJP for the creation of a separate district and representation in the J&K Legislative Assembly. Similarly, BJP has also become popular among the residents of Changthang along China’s border as they believe that PM Modi’s change in norms of engagement with hostile neighbours and counter-ops in Doklam and Balakot have increased their sense of security. In the coming months, BJP’s approach to win hearts and minds could well alleviate the grievances of the Shina-speakers of Gurez and the Paharis of Poonch, who desire for the establishment of Ladakh-style autonomous hill councils. Like Zanskar, Gurez also deserves a separate district and Assembly seat since these valleys remain cut off from the rest of the country during the six snowiest months of winter.

Notwithstanding the hopes and aspirations of the voters, BJP still lacks a majority in the Rajya Sabha, or the Upper House of Parliament, limiting the Constitutional scope to match these expectations. However, the ruling party is likely to get a majority in the Rajya Sabha by the end of 2020, which will clear the way to push for major legislations.

PM Modi has emerged as one of the most powerful global leaders and recent surgical raids inside Pakistan have improved his standing within the country. But a leader can sustain successes and popularity only with the help of his people. PM Modi can create allies in the border districts of J&K by empowering ethnic and religious minorities. The Baltis of Nubra, the nomads of Changthang, the POK refugees, the Kashmiri Pandits, and the most oppressed yet least mentioned Gujjar and Bakarwal communities of Pir Panjal and Chenab deserve immediate attention as they all look towards BJP to be uplifted. Giving a voice and political representation to these marginalised people will strengthen the diverse make-up of J&K and send a positive message to Gilgit-Baltistan.

The author is a researcher and human rights advocate. Currently, Sering is running the Washington DC based Institute for Gilgit Baltistan Studies.

Why PM Modi’s victory made Gilgit-Baltistan happy - The Sunday Guardian Live
 
  • Informative
Reactions: _Anonymous_