Congrats: seems you’ve just lost pic-,
No need for trolls nor other a$$oles (you know whoe i mean): just by your own.
Once again congrats, sir
LMbots: 1 / SFF: –1
Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning and F-22 'Raptor' : News & Discussion
- Thread starter Nick
- Start date
No need for trolls nor other a$$oles (you know whoe i mean): just by your own.
Once again congrats, sir
LMbots: 1 / SFF: –1
In September 2007 your fat turkey was intended to be FOC in the very next years.
It's not the case in 2022, so...
LM is not close to a lie.
Attachments
Someone stole the TALIOS from that Rafale. Only a fanboy could think that is low RCS and think it has no added drag. What you are seeing there, a 1500lb weight bomb load, 2 missile and 3 tanks. The F-35 carries internally and is stealth RCS and has no added drag.
Last edited:
Which loyal wingman do you like best?
australia .......................................... .. .......... .... US
UK............................................ .......... France
australia .......................................... .. .......... .... US
UK............................................ .......... France
Last edited:
I generally avoid trolling and talking to pets, but have a question, too:
Which SSN do you prefer, the French one:
Naval Group officially delivers first nuclear-powered Barracuda sub
Naval Group has officially delivered the lead boat of the nuclear-powered Barracuda class submarines, Suffren to the French Directorate General of Armaments (DGA) following the completion of a se
Or, for the next 20years, the RAN one:
You can disagree with others, but basic manners is not too much to ask, is it?
Don't be a douche here , no one will take you seriously.
Don't be a douche here , no one will take you seriously.
The more a bird is loaded, the more the drag is. It's evident : the bird has to improve AoA to increase lift. More AoA = more drag.
In the UK case, they learned a lot of Lockeed Martin : it's only a powerpoint....
Australia..... they only pay for. Don't try to explain they are able to study and produce even a gen 3 fighter (it will be a nice mess with SSN....somewhere in 2045....)
Australia is set to receive its first nuclear submarine at least five years ahead of schedule after America agreed to fast-track the project. Defence Minister Peter Dutton has revealed he expects the first vessel to be completed in the early 2030s – well ahead of the 2040 estimate.
Australia's nuclear submarines ahead of schedule
You need to ask the guy who brought up the sub a few posts higher. I think the early 30's is because both the Astute and Virginia are existing subs. The French sub was canceled even before the detailed drawings were done.
Maybe with a fully US made sub, with full US crew, and full US maintainers.
Or with old Los Angeles 2nd hand subs.
If not, NO WAY.
1. We might never get these submarines
Credit to The Australian’s foreign affairs columnist Greg Sheridan for being the first to say this in a devastatingly good column. I was worried from the outset that Australia was taking on a huge task, but it never occurred to me to make what now seems like an obvious point, which is that this project is so wildly ambitious that it may be cancelled long before the first steel is cut.
Changing my mind about AUKUS | Lowy Institute
What I said then, and what I think now, about the nuclear-powered subs announcement that caught everyone by surprise.
www.lowyinstitute.org
1. We might never get these submarines
Credit to The Australian’s foreign affairs columnist Greg Sheridan for being the first to say this in a devastatingly good column. I was worried from the outset that Australia was taking on a huge task, but it never occurred to me to make what now seems like an obvious point, which is that this project is so wildly ambitious that it may be cancelled long before the first steel is cut.
Changing my mind about AUKUS | Lowy Institute
What I said then, and what I think now, about the nuclear-powered subs announcement that caught everyone by surprise.
He's basically saying he's scared of fighting China. But he doesn't realise that China's gonna be the aggressor and Australia won't have a choice in the matter. The last time Australia fought in an "us or them" war was in the 40s, so it's no wonder people are getting soft today.
It depends what you classify as directed energy weapons. If you are talking laser, that is a while off. EMP and the directed AESA radar is now.
