Operation Sindoor: India Strikes Terroist Camps Inside Pakitsan

But fb post says the hangar collapsed, 5 died immediately and 40 odd were inside the hanger and are injured. So, you can guess they must be working on saab when hangar collapsed and damage must have been done. But I feel it might be repairable like the one TTP caused which PAF restored it again.
Which of their guy died? That Commander?
 
Historically, Pakistan has always been superior / peer / near-peer. In 1971, Pakistan had a lot of stuff which were technologically superior to India. However, we have always prevailed with better training and competent military leadership. Even this time, we spanked Pak black and blue. I agree that the 5th gen thing will be a source of trouble, but, that's not the biggest concern. Even if we beg, borrow or steal and get into a position where Pak is way below us technologically, it will still not solve the core problem - the handling of external countries and narrative during a conflict. Pakistan is an existential problem for us and it it on us to solve it. Russia was against the entire world when it started the fight against Ukraine - it did not give in.

Indian leadership is inherently weak when it comes to being bossed around by US - this is something which has to change, only then will any tech improvements in our military be of any use, otherwise, you can have the best weapons and training but without the will and strength of the leader, it's useless as has been proven again this time.

I am really sorry, but we just let Pak off the hook - we could have ensured that Pak's Navy and Airforce capabilities are degraded beyond repair this time and set an example of what will happen if and when the next Pahelgam happens. That would have been the strongest deterrence against future Pak sponsored terror. The would have known that without their navy (already non-existent) and Airforce, they will be sitting ducks waiting to be blown out of the water.
Don't worry about it right now. Even if Pak fully wins the narrative (which they won't), it's not the right time for us to get into a large scale conflict.

@randomradio already said it in post #2161. Think of the long term game. We need a 4/5x larger economy than our $4T and a much better R&D and industrial base. Without that, we're done for in the long run. That joker, Trump was saying "let them fight" at the start. He wants this war to go on indefinitely. US and Europe want us to throw away all the hard work we've put in so far. They absolutely do not want an Eastern power after the rise China. They see it as their power eroding further.
 
Last edited:
@randomradio do you think we took out their AWACS on ground? I think so... Some idiot called RescueRanger in PeeDeeEff was also hinting that.

RUMINT for now.

RUMINT also says we shot down an AWACS along with a bunch of fighters.
T

Tbh Russian economy may be small but they have like 8,000 nukes and were historically a superpower. I don't think we can be compared with them even now.

Russia's defense modernization budget is 2-3 times ours, and this is not counting the money earmarked for fighting in Ukraine. Once the war ends, they will be able to match the combined military capital expenditure of the US and Europe. That potential is why Ukraine's been pushed into a war with Russia.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RationalGuy
With all said and done, I am super pissed at Mr Misri right now. That last presser was an effin' disaster..
 
Don't worry about it right now. Even if Pak fully wins the narrative (which they won't), it's not the right time for us to get into a large scale conflict.

@randomradio already said it in post #2161. Think of the long term game. We need a 4/5x larger economy than our $4T and a much better R&D and industrial base. Without that, we're done for in the long run. That joker, Trump was saying "let them fight" at the start. He wants this war to go in indefinitely. US and Europe want us to throw away all the hard work we've put in so far. They absolutely do not want an Eastern power after the rise China. They see it as their power eroding further.
Here is Pakistani Winning the narrative lol 🤣

IMG_20250511_020113.png
 
In addition to your points - I think democratic leaders must be seen as reasonably by electorate. Hence, they want to look reasonably.

Id China is in india's position, they would have never agreed to ceasefire. They would be willing to risk a nuclear exchange.

Ceasefire demands from other powers come from a position of strength. If we don't have sufficient leverage, then we will have to back down.

That's why China kept its head down after losing the war in Vietnam. They started acting up only after they started getting big, when the SCS scandal blew up. We will get to that point in the 2030s. Xi single-handedly destroyed 30 years of effort put forth by the Democrats and Europeans in East Asia in a matter of years.

There's a need to make our constitution pro-India quickly. That requires a supermajority and I hope BJP is working towards that for 2029.
 
Lmao Trump doesn't care about some backwater Pakistanis. The call was not by Trump or Vance it was by the deep state and Pentagon telling us to pipe down or their plans to destabilize Iran will get screwed up. That's it. Pakistan gets to live because it went back to its old customer after riding Chinese microdick for so long.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Asterion Moloc
Lmao Trump doesn't care about some backwater Pakistanis. The call was not by Trump or Vance it was by the deep state and Pentagon telling us to pipe down or their plans to destabilize Iran will get screwed up. That's it. Pakistan gets to live because it went back to its old customer after riding Chinese microdick for so long.
Since when did we become a US client state that we need to pay heed to their interests more than ours?
 
Yes, I know. Don't underestimate Pakistani "5th gen warfare" mindset or Western disdain for India. Look at CNN 180s.
If the west and China think we're some weak country which even a third rate failed state like Pakistan can push around then we have already won half the battle 😀
 
More importantly, India knows where its defence stands when it comes to air conflict. Hopefully someone fixes that.

My dear friend. Dont be arrogant, as it will be our end. Lets face it, their BVR worked. In whatever sense or context, it worked. We can not keep ourself limited to 90s tech. We need to step up to latest in air warfare.
It was the datalinking of the aewcs that was the issue. Our meteors never came into play or were used. I don't even think IAF went into bvr combat this time. The PAF just spammed pl-15's in hopes of hitting something and got two-three fighters against a horde of 70 planes they were facing. I don't even think we tried to fight a bvr fight because we were more focused on defending the airspace than actually taking out pakistani fighters. The rafales weren't used with meteors for some reason instead they were used for A2G missions while the Air war was being handled by the su-30's.
We need r-37m and astra mk2 asap.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RationalGuy
Wh

What about chinese spillover of such technology into Pakistan?

India is climbing up from using generic tech to exotic tech. For all these years both worked with generic tech so there was a bit of balance. But pretty soon India will introduce exotic tech like the US, Russia, and China, that will leave Pak behind. And exotic tech is not available for sale.

Take something as simple as the 40N6 missile. Pakistan cannot buy anything that exceeds MTCR, so they cannot buy the 40N6. China can still sell something similar secretly, but we will reach a point where SAMs will come in 500, 1000, and 1500 km ranges. PAF will have to develop these SAMs.

Who's gonna sell them SSNs, space shuttles, advanced semiconductors, quantum computers and so on?
 
  • Like
Reactions: YoungWolf and Paro
If such a short war or skirmish happens before in between now and 2030? what we will do? Why not buy a 100 odd R=37s or AIM260?

I don't understand why the IAF does not plan for these short skirmishes and rather remain focused on squadrons count?

In my opinion shooting down enemy jets is more important than creating some craters on the enemy airbase runways which anyways cam be fixed in few hours. Besides even cheaper jets cost a 30-40 million dollars a piece which cannot be replaced for months. A destroyed airbase can be made re-operational within a few days but if jets are gone, then they are gone.
We literally struck multiple airbases of a nuclear power and caught them with their pants down. Their lumber 1 integrated Hypersonic capable air defence couldn't even intercept cruise missiles. Even i feel disturbed at the loss of our jets but in the bigger picture we absolutely pummeled them. And we didn't just cause a few craters, we did much more as will be hopefully revealed by satellite pics in the coming days. If their Saab awacs getting damaged by hanger collapse is true then it's another humiliation for lumber 1 army.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ultimatejuggernaut
Since when did we become a US client state that we need to pay heed to their interests more than ours?
Modi actually rhought his relationship with Trump would help him that's why he accepted the ceasefire conditions. This was done on emotions and "trust" not on any actual strategic value. We haven't even asked for the return of the bsf soldier and the terrorists who did Pahalgam. We just accepted the ceasefire. Like what??
 
India is climbing up from using generic tech to exotic tech. For all these years both worked with generic tech so there was a bit of balance. But pretty soon India will introduce exotic tech like the US, Russia, and China, that will leave Pak behind. And exotic tech is not available for sale.

Take something as simple as the 40N6 missile. Pakistan cannot buy anything that exceeds MTCR, so they cannot buy the 40N6. China can still sell something similar secretly, but we will reach a point where SAMs will come in 500, 1000, and 1500 km ranges. PAF will have to develop these SAMs.

Who's gonna sell them SSNs, space shuttles, advanced semiconductors, quantum computers and so on?
China may hand them "hand me down" Type 91 or 92 SSN but they're so hilariously ancient and loud that it would essentially be staying above the seabed for however long the IN wants it to lol. As for other tech there is a real possibility of Chinese spillover to Pakistan.
 
If the west and China think we're some weak country which even a third rate failed state like Pakistan can push around then we have already won half the battle 😀
Pak military focusses on symbolic "victories" to rally the populace and shape perception. Indian military focusses on results and keeps quiet. We struck their major airbases and Pakistan's response is "80% Brahmos stock destroyed in one strike". Like Indian forces are stupid enough to store cutting edge missiles in one place and not have them geographically dispersed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RationalGuy