The panic buys

That's now how it works though. You need localised superiority in numbers, not absolute superiority.

Our II Corps has 3+1 armoured brigades, and can be supported by another armoured brigade from elsewhere, like an IABG or an armoured brigade from a RAPIDS. This will give us a localised armour superiority over a Pakistani infantry division or two. And once we have taken over an objective, the area will then be guarded by our own troops, and our Strike Corps can then move on to the next objective. And if the Pakistanis need to retake that objective, they will now have to bring in three times the number against the units protecting that area. To support that, you do not need 3x the troops across the entire army.

So when you say the Pakistanis have 300 SPGs, so we must have 900 SPGs, you are thinking in terms of WW2 era tactics, not modern warfare.

The main objective in modern warfare is to get the enemy to bunch up in one place and then bomb them from the air. Like the case with Longewala, where all it took was 1 company to route an entire brigade. Different story that they bunched up SPHon their own.

SPGs are distributed based on the number of armoured brigades you have. Since armoured brigades are required to speahead any attack and require high speed mobility in all terrains, you need SPGs connected to the armoured brigades to meet such requirements. The rest of the army doesn't need SPGs, towed artillery is more than enough. I would recommend looking up the American BCT TOE. Out of the 32 brigades they operate, only the armoured brigades have SPGs, no different from ours.

Your only argument is we need a bigger army.

100 SPH's for 5th largest Armored force on this planet, really?

For the US examples, US army has Close to 1400 M109's SPH's. Out of which close to 500 are in storage. Their stored units are 5 times our planned SPH's and 10 times our Current fleet. Pakistan total SPH's are close to 4.5 times our planned fleet. Chew on that for a while.
 
100 SPH's for 5th largest Armored force on this planet, really?

For the US examples, US army has Close to 1400 M109's SPH's. Out of which close to 500 are in storage. Their stored units are 5 times our planned SPH's and 10 times our Current fleet. Pakistan total SPH's are close to 4.5 times our planned fleet. Chew on that for a while.

Nope. We have about 350-450 SPHs in inventory, 100 of those are new. The 100 that were replaced should be in storage instead, or waiting to be scrapped. So about 80 must be in their absolute last legs, which should see replacements with the 50 options of the K9, and another 100-200 older guns are 30 years old and will need to be replaced over the next 5 years.

In fact, the actual number of SPGs we operate is unknown since we do not know the actual number of the last class of guns that were inducted, called Catapult. Some say it's 100 in operation and 70-100 in reserve, or that all are operational. Fuses the M-46 with the Vijayanta.

130mm_Catapult.jpg


The Americans have 180 + reserves in operation, so about 200+.

We have twice the operational armoured brigades as the US, so we effectively have twice as many operational SPGs around. Also, every one of our new SPGs are far superior to the American one, with about twice the firing range and a whole host of other advanced capabilities, by extension the Pakistani SPGs as well.

Most of Pakistan's SPGs are also on their last legs. Their last upgraded batch of 110 used guns were bought in 2010. Their total usable inventory is about 260 guns.

At least we can say for sure that all the main units that will enter Pakistan during a limited war will be the ones primarily equipped with the K9.
 
Nope. We have about 350-450 SPHs in inventory, 100 of those are new. The 100 that were replaced should be in storage instead, or waiting to be scrapped. So about 80 must be in their absolute last legs, which should see replacements with the 50 options of the K9, and another 100-200 older guns are 30 years old and will need to be replaced over the next 5 years.

In fact, the actual number of SPGs we operate is unknown since we do not know the actual number of the last class of guns that were inducted, called Catapult. Some say it's 100 in operation and 70-100 in reserve, or that all are operational. Fuses the M-46 with the Vijayanta.

130mm_Catapult.jpg


The Americans have 180 + reserves in operation, so about 200+.

We have twice the operational armoured brigades as the US, so we effectively have twice as many operational SPGs around. Also, every one of our new SPGs are far superior to the American one, with about twice the firing range and a whole host of other advanced capabilities, by extension the Pakistani SPGs as well.

Most of Pakistan's SPGs are also on their last legs. Their last upgraded batch of 110 used guns were bought in 2010. Their total usable inventory is about 260 guns.

At least we can say for sure that all the main units that will enter Pakistan during a limited war will be the ones primarily equipped with the K9.
LMAO

Other than the new K9's Indian army Has Zero SPHs; All gvozdikas have been decomissioned, as a matter of fact Indian army doesn't use any 122mm weaponry.

US army has 998 Active M109's and 500 in storage per The Military Balance 2020. Routledge. , provide your reference for 180??

The army had placed an order of only 40 catapults and none of them are in use anymore. Not a single Mk1 catapults based on the vijayanta are in active service.
 
LMAO

Other than the new K9's Indian army Has Zero SPHs; All gvozdikas have been decomissioned, as a matter of fact Indian army doesn't use any 122mm weaponry.

US army has 998 Active M109's and 500 in storage per The Military Balance 2020. Routledge. , provide your reference for 180??

The army had placed an order of only 40 catapults and none of them are in use anymore. Not a single Mk1 catapults based on the vijayanta are in active service.

Wrong info for everything.

The 40 Catapults you are referring to are the Arjun based Catapult Mk2, which was cancelled, this was only as recent as a few years ago. You've confused that with the original Catapult Mk1, which, as I mentioned before, is with the Vijayanta chassis. Roughly about 150-200 were built and are still in use.

Gvozdikas are still operational.

If you remove the Abbots, we have 310-410 SPGs in operation. I'd easily say 360 at the minimum. Which would come up to 19 regiments, the same as our armoured brigade strength. So 100 K9s, 110 Gvozdikas and 150 Catapults.

US Army officially operates 10 armoured brigades, each have 18 SPGs, so that's it. This story of 998 active M109s and 500 in storage is just stuff in reserve and storage, not in active operational use.
 
Wrong info for everything.

The 40 Catapults you are referring to are the Arjun based Catapult Mk2, which was cancelled, this was only as recent as a few years ago. You've confused that with the original Catapult Mk1, which, as I mentioned before, is with the Vijayanta chassis. Roughly about 150-200 were built and are still in use.

Gvozdikas are still operational.

If you remove the Abbots, we have 310-410 SPGs in operation. I'd easily say 360 at the minimum. Which would come up to 19 regiments, the same as our armoured brigade strength. So 100 K9s, 110 Gvozdikas and 150 Catapults.

US Army officially operates 10 armoured brigades, each have 18 SPGs, so that's it. This story of 998 active M109s and 500 in storage is just stuff in reserve and storage, not in active operational use.
Again , not a single vijayanta platform is active.
Zero Gvozdika's operational.

And as usual wrong again US has 10 divisions with 30 active brigades.

Field Arty Regiments support different divisions and brigades.
these are the active ones


Following are in reserve:
 
  • Like
Reactions: CuriosityRover
Again , not a single vijayanta platform is active.
Zero Gvozdika's operational.

Well, cheers.

And as usual wrong again US has 10 divisions with 30 active brigades.

That's what I said...
Out of the 32 brigades they operate, only the armoured brigades have SPGs, no different from ours.

Of those 32 brigades, 10 are armoured brigades. And each armoured brigade has about 90 tanks and 18 guns.

So 10x18 = 180. Add 3 each in reserve, it comes to 210.

That's it.

But by your logic, each brigade has more guns than tanks. :ROFLMAO: So I can't do anything about that.
 
That's what I said...
Out of the 32 brigades they operate, only the armoured brigades have SPGs, no different from ours.

Of those 32 brigades, 10 are armoured brigades. And each armoured brigade has about 90 tanks and 18 guns.

So 10x18 = 180. Add 3 each in reserve, it comes to 210.

That's it.

But by your logic, each brigade has more guns than tanks. :ROFLMAO: So I can't do anything about that.

Not true at all.

incorrect again!!
Just for the A7 Version
The U.S. Army planned on procuring a fleet of 580 sets of M109A7 howitzers and M992A3 ammunition support vehicles.

The Army plans to upgrade 689 Paladins to A7-standard , (meaning it has 689 Palladin A6's to begin with)

Just the A7 fleets stands 5 times number you claim.
 
Not true at all.

incorrect again!!
Just for the A7 Version
The U.S. Army planned on procuring a fleet of 580 sets of M109A7 howitzers and M992A3 ammunition support vehicles.

The Army plans to upgrade 689 Paladins to A7-standard , (meaning it has 689 Palladin A6's to begin with)

Just the A7 fleets stands 5 times number you claim.

Even your article says the army only has a third of the 700 SPGs upgraded and require budgetary approval for the rest. It's pretty much the same as the number I claimed.

But is it surprising that reserves are upgraded as well?

My number is not a claim, it comes from the application of common sense when you know the exact number of operational brigades deployed and then looking at the TOE of a brigade. This is not a secret.
 
Even your article says the army only has a third of the 700 SPGs upgraded and require budgetary approval for the rest. It's pretty much the same as the number I claimed.

But is it surprising that reserves are upgraded as well?

My number is not a claim, it comes from the application of common sense when you know the exact number of operational brigades deployed and then looking at the TOE of a brigade. This is not a secret.
1500 sph's and 280 operational... indeed gr88 logic Read it again the upgrades are for Paladin A6 to A7, A6 by all means are fully functional SPH's and genereations ahead of Vijayanta catapult that you claim are operational.
 
1500 sph's and 280 operational... indeed gr88 logic Read it again the upgrades are for Paladin A6 to A7, A6 by all means are fully functional SPH's and genereations ahead of Vijayanta catapult that you claim are operational.

All armies have a mix of obsolete and advanced systems.

Now all your arguments are less about MoD's slow decision making and more about mocking India's lack of money. Congratulations. Yes, America has more money.
 
All armies have a mix of obsolete and advanced systems.

Now all your arguments are less about MoD's slow decision making and more about mocking India's lack of money. Congratulations. Yes, America has more money.
A MoD which can line up 750 Recovery vehicles cannot buy decent quantity of SPH's? Even a Pakistan that has a fraction of India's budget lines up a SPH fleet 4 times bigger.
 
A MoD which can line up 750 Recovery vehicles cannot buy decent quantity of SPH's? Even a Pakistan that has a fraction of India's budget lines up a SPH fleet 4 times bigger.

If you rely on wrong info, of course you're gonna come up with these arguments.
 
We should be like Pakistan, beg or buy excess stored second hand guns or like Chinese, mass produce Atags at what whatever quality available..

What are we doing..
Like a joke in Tamil movie,
Auto puts indicator on one side, hand signal on other side but go straight...
 
We should be like Pakistan, beg or buy excess stored second hand guns or like Chinese, mass produce Atags at what whatever quality available..

What are we doing..
Like a joke in Tamil movie,
Auto puts indicator on one side, hand signal on other side but go straight...
Mass Produce ATAGS ? the MOD is already plugging in Israeli Athos to kill Atags.
 
We should be like Pakistan, beg or buy excess stored second hand guns or like Chinese, mass produce Atags at what whatever quality available..

What are we doing..
Like a joke in Tamil movie,
Auto puts indicator on one side, hand signal on other side but go straight...

For limited war, we have enough or are in the process of getting there. And that's the govt's priority anyway. Get enough stuff to fight a limited war. For example, when it comes to artillery, the 100 K9s will fill in 5 Armoured IBGs, which can be used to attack Pakistan in a limited war setting. 2 more regiments worth of guns are pending. Similarly, the 7 M777 regiments will meet requirement for 7 infantry IBGs required to attack China. Both are essentially enough to equip two whole corps and reserves. Both essentially offer 30% more firepower than our existing Strike Corps.

If I'm speculating correctly, it's likely that each MSC will have 5 infantry IBGs for now and each Strike Corps will have 3 armoured IBGs and 3 mechanised IBGs. Similarly, the Chinese have 6 brigades in each of their corps. So any extra will be underutilised since we do not plan to fight an all-out war yet. So don't get fooled by people who do not know much about ORBAT or TOE.

However some things are missing and that needs to be done, like MPATGM and some types of air defence which are under negotiations or yet to be delivered. MPATGM should have entered user trials back in 2018. Similarly QRSAM should have entered user trials in 2019. Biho, needed for the IBGs in a limited war with Pakistan, are stuck in a quandry due to Russian complaints. And so on. So stuff that need criticising are not being criticised. Rather irrelevant stuff has found more interest. MANPADs are still under negotations. Similarly LUH and Ka-226T are stuck in negotiations and politics. These things require a lot of discussions instead.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sathya