If we can have freedom to fully integrate our own pods with rafale , that will be enough.
Last edited:
The Rafale and what you know about it.
- Thread starter Picdelamirand-oil
- Start date
As I alluded to in my last post,
I don't think that will be enough, EA will be more than just hanging a pod, no matter how good it is, The architecture has to be integrated into the avionics, sensor fusion,
Not an easy task, Your SU-30 uses the Russian system, which is already done
We could even give you a Growler pod, but it needs the architecture sensor fusion to make it work
www.asianmilitaryreview.com
I don't think that will be enough, EA will be more than just hanging a pod, no matter how good it is, The architecture has to be integrated into the avionics, sensor fusion,
Not an easy task, Your SU-30 uses the Russian system, which is already done
We could even give you a Growler pod, but it needs the architecture sensor fusion to make it work
Australia boosts Growler capabilities with next-gen jammer pods - Asian Military Review
Boeing EA-18G Growlers of the RAAF’s No. 6 Squadron have started using the Raytheon AN/ALQ-249 NGJ-MB pod.
www.asianmilitaryreview.com
Last edited:
Agreed, but it would need an entire new system, It's too hard and cost prohibitive, They have the SPECTRA self defence jamming,
If it was easy, the Rafale would have a dedicated EA pod,
As I said, your SU already had the Russian system, to hook your EA into
If it was easy, the Rafale would have a dedicated EA pod,
As I said, your SU already had the Russian system, to hook your EA into
Last edited:
It's just because you confuse SEAD and external jammer pods. I did, however, provide an official document explaining the French doctrine on SEAD, but it seems too difficult for you to read a text of more than three lines, and besides, it would contradict your convictions.