Have you ever heard anything about Nadirsha's loot of Delhi? He even exempted Persian from paying tax for years afterwards.
Ukraine - Russia Conflict
- Thread starter randomradio
- Start date
Yes. Infact BajiRao Peshwa wanted to fight him and take all that loot back and died due to heat stroke while trying to reach Delhi faster.
Saudi oil reserves if all extracted and sold today (which is impossible), at today's prices is <£2tr. You are bonkers to think India had £45tr to steal, even at today's prices. The total value of the natural resources in any country in the world does not add up to that, even at today's prices. Your claims aren't even mathematically possible. Furthermore, even if India did have that amount of natural resources there is no way they could have all been extracted. Global oil production is 90m barrels/day, or 33bn barrels per year, valued at $3.3tr, it takes the modern production capacity of every nation in the world nearly 2 decades to extract the value you have claimed. What would be possible from 1751 with Britain alone? Who would even buy that much resources? You are talking complete and utter shit.
You mean like they did with Bin Laden?
They were all in hiding when NATO was there, but now they think it is safe so they come out, which makes what needs to be done easier.You love making up your own facts don't you?
People with low iq should be banned from this forum like u and ur another westerner friend. Atleast read your post twice before posting shit.Saudi oil reserves if all extracted and sold today (which is impossible), at today's prices is <£2tr. You are bonkers to think India had £45tr to steal, even at today's prices. The total value of the natural resources in any country in the world does not add up to that, even at today's prices. Your claims aren't even mathematically possible. Furthermore, even if India did have that amount of natural resources there is no way they could have all been extracted. Global oil production is 90m barrels/day, or 33bn barrels per year, valued at $3.3tr, it takes the modern production capacity of every nation in the world nearly 2 decades to extract the value you have claimed. What would be possible from 1751 with Britain alone? Who would even buy that much resources? You are talking complete and utter shit.
You mean like they did with Bin Laden?
You love making up your own facts don't you?
Indians should quit making ludicrous claims. And as regards who owes who, what if South East Asia asks India for compensation for the Cholas, or other Indians empires?
This ridiculous diatribe is the reason your country is in Russia's back pocket. You have 'the West is at fault for everything' drummed into you in schools, which is why you can't think for yourselves, and why you accept diabolically poor economic performance and living standards from your government, because they always have that excuse - it's Britain's fault. India had half the economy of China in 1751. In 1947 it had a larger economy with half as many people. Now it has a larger population and only a fraction of the GDP. This is not because of Britain, it's because your government in the interceding years has been useless because you have let them away with the excuse that it's Britain's fault for 75 years. It's nothing but a joke to anyone listening to you.
India was looted, raped, molested by foreigners in past by many times through different timeline. Blame Indians for that, we are the one who stocked our money inside temples instead of building military, what invaders done was the sop of ever after war scenarios.
Britishers were far far far far better than what Nadirsha & Timur, they are even better than sultanaates & Mughals. After all because of them we progressed to a modern society. Its because of the british rule sati was stopped, it is because of them cast discrimination had reduced to some extant, its because of them education ( may be for clerical oriented one) became available for common people. Yeas they had looted money, but they brought benefits to india as a society. Lastly, British rule had ended the muslim rule in india on permanent basis. Imagine living under a mughals or islamic Mysore kingdom in 21 st century, yuck.
you need urgent study about sanatan and India. islam had spread across Gibralter within 57 yrs and convereted every nation including central Asia to Islam but even after 800 yrs they could not make India an Islamic nation. We remained a Hindu majority nation. The so called 800 yrs of muslim rule is a concoted story. Islam did not go beyond Delhi till 1527 when Battle of Kahnva took plcae between Maharana Sansha and babur and it did not go beyond Vindhyas till Auranjzeb and going past Vindhyas cost Mongols the demise of their empire as Marathas oblitrated them with support of Jaats of North India.
Yup, it is easy do forceful conversion or isolated communities. Thats not the case with a populated, but interconnected society like india.Even today's Afghan population is far less than most of the indian state, thats says everything.
Shows where Russia's true alignment is. People like @randomradio @vstol Jockey will understand this.
, very true, its logical.
. either you dislike (...... deep hatred) the medieval invaders or you think british (or even west) is a charity organization which is total nonsense. They dint do any thing out of benevolence or altruism but out of necessity. As you rightly pointed out education was to breed clerks to follow their orders, they dint end caste discrimination they amplified it further. Probably some one has to remind you that they were more racist in those times and to think they were for a equal society is nonsense. When british were successors to muslims how come they are better than former?
Russian troops destroyed the Buk air defense system of the Ukrainian army.
Due to the large number of PFM-1 Lepestok mines in Ukraine, people began to destroy them with improvised means.
Due to the large number of PFM-1 Lepestok mines in Ukraine, people began to destroy them with improvised means.
Part of the UK for 8 centuries.
Have you ever even tried explaining why India went from having a larger GDP than China in 1947 with half the population, to having a fraction of the GDP today with the same population? I'll give you a clue, it's nothing to do with Britain.