@Innominate, @Picdelamirand-oil, a Mk-84 2,000lb aerial bomb makes a crater 15m wide, or roughly an Su-30's wingspan. So given the size of the craters, it can only be an SRBM with a 500+kg warhead. Munitions explosion, well the crater in the top right is in a spot where nothing was previously.
Mark 84 bomb
The Mark 84 or BLU-117[2] is an American general-purpose bomb, it is also the largest of the Mark 80 series of weapons. Entering service during the Vietnam War, it became a commonly used US heavy unguided bomb (due to the amount of High-explosive content packed inside) to be dropped, second only...military-history.fandom.com
Now the US did say that if Ukraine is receiving fire from an area inside Russia, then it is a legitimate target. So if an airbase is launching strikes against Ukraine, it is a legitimate target.
You're right on ATACMS, but craters have appeared in places where there were no munitions. Maybe the accuracy of the missiles isn't quite pin-point yet.
ATACMS not likely to have done this.
so are the NATO countries for providing weapons, manpower and special forces to Ukraine. The strike on Saki airbase was most likely from long range HIMARS rockets which can spread bomblets over a wide area. Now the chances of escalation to mainland Europe are extremely high and very soon we might see Russia striking couple of airbases in NATO countries in retaliation.@Innominate, @Picdelamirand-oil, a Mk-84 2,000lb aerial bomb makes a crater 15m wide, or roughly an Su-30's wingspan. So given the size of the craters, it can only be an SRBM with a 500+kg warhead. Munitions explosion, well the crater in the top right is in a spot where nothing was previously.
Mark 84 bomb
The Mark 84 or BLU-117[2] is an American general-purpose bomb, it is also the largest of the Mark 80 series of weapons. Entering service during the Vietnam War, it became a commonly used US heavy unguided bomb (due to the amount of High-explosive content packed inside) to be dropped, second only...military-history.fandom.com
Now the US did say that if Ukraine is receiving fire from an area inside Russia, then it is a legitimate target. So if an airbase is launching strikes against Ukraine, it is a legitimate target.
If chinese continue in the same way for next 10 years, it is nearly game over.
Just one itty bitty problem.... US stopped making cluster munitions for their HiMARS andM270s. They don't exist anymore. Whatever hit this base was either ATAMCS, Neptunes converted for ground attack or their mysterious 500km range ballistic missile.so are the NATO countries for providing weapons, manpower and special forces to Ukraine. The strike on Saki airbase was most likely from long range HIMARS rockets which can spread bomblets over a wide area. Now the chances of escalation to mainland Europe are extremely high and very soon we might see Russia striking couple of airbases in NATO countries in retaliation.
Saki is 240km beyond the frontline. It was unlikely regular HIMARS rockets and there's no record of the US providing ATACMS. Special Forces raid seems unlikely on a frontline airbase in the middle of a war, so that only leaves Hrim-2 or Vilkha and one crater where there were no munitions is >15m across, so that leaves Hrim-2.so are the NATO countries for providing weapons, manpower and special forces to Ukraine. The strike on Saki airbase was most likely from long range HIMARS rockets which can spread bomblets over a wide area. Now the chances of escalation to mainland Europe are extremely high and very soon we might see Russia striking couple of airbases in NATO countries in retaliation.
And if you went around the ghettos in India, how many Indians wouldn't be able to find the world on a world map.