That's quite a leap mate. If you historically there were dynasties that were Mongolian and Chinese that crossed both borders and included Manchuria. But no matter, there were also purely Chinese dynasties that ruled it dating back a thousand years, like Liao, Jin and Tang.
If China invaded it, Russia would have very little grounds to argue on, especially given the position it's taken in Ukraine and most of the West would likely abstain in any UN vote, because frankly they'd deserve it.
Wow, they destroyed a single tank. Well, that makes up for the 200+km^2 of land they withdrew from yesterday.
Nope mate, I've pointed out that several Mongolian led dynasties include Chinese and Manchurian territory and peoples and that Chinese dynasties dating back a thousand years (Liao, Jin and Tang) also do.Then everything British belongs to the French as well. And you just justified the Nazi's claim over all of Europe with your logic. The Germans were the biggest and still remain the biggest ethnic group in the US, so that gives them claim over the US too.
CCP's greed? Sure they have greed wrt South China Sea, but you can hardly talk about China's greed when you consider the distance of Manchuria to Beijing and the distance to Moscow. Russia has no business in East Asia at all, it's all an imperial empire without civil liberties. They stole Manchuria from the Chinese in the late 19th century and then pseudo-stole mainland China from the true Chinese rulers in 1949.The Mongolians are their own people. And only the Qing dynasty had some control over Mongolia over a brief period. Everything else is about CCP's greed.
India would be about as much use as a chocolate fireguard.Any Russia-China war is of benefit to the West, why would they care about reasons or do anything about it? And the point of that article is Russia and China are not friends, hence the Russian reliance on India.