It seems there is some possibility still left of re-establishing connection with the lander. Pray pray keep praying.
You are correct. Lander was programmed to alter its landing position based on surface data to chose the exact landing spot.It did not , there is the predicted trajectory and a permissable margin of deviation from the same. The lander was within the permissible limits infact close to predicted trajectory.
Most probably the landing producing some hiccups
if it has not crash landed, re-establishing communication could be possible. I wonder if the engine shut down prematurely at 2 KM Alt.It seems there is some possibility still left of re-establishing connection with the lander. Pray pray keep praying.
Possible and very likely.I wonder if the engine shut down prematurely at 2 KM Alt.
Actually the third engine, the center one was supposed to cut in for final soft landing. may bge it failed to come alive.Possible and very likely.
did the lunar dust create problems?
it will. moon has very low G force of its own. Dust will fly higher than earth.At 2 KM Alt lunar dust should not have mattered........
The problem was always going to be those engines. Unfortunate that it had to end like this.Actually the third engine, the center one was supposed to cut in for final soft landing. may bge it failed to come alive.
Dust comes into play at less than 400 metres alt.At 2 KM Alt lunar dust should not have mattered........
I’m getting concerned with the coverage as if this is done deal. Even the highly conservative ndtv is gushing. We should get ourselves a reality check that things can go very bad...and that’s ok.
Lander deviated from path..
lag gayiiiii bc ...
I am joking![]()