At last a common sense news.
No Gripen because it hurts Tejas.Any idea about 50 or so F35s for India?
Rafale was L1.If we are not getting the f-5's there's no point getting the rafale. Presently the best plane IAF can but is the typhoon with the captor mk2
My point was for the present mrfa. In the previous mrfa the rafale and the superhornet blk 3 were the most mature aircrafts out of them all. The f-16 was too dated a design and no supercruise, the gripen was too US dependent and small, the typhoon did not have a working aesa. Rafale was the best option with supercruise and all aspect 4++ capability. This time it's different. The Eurofighter has a GaN radar, f-15EX would be offered with GaN radars most likely and this time Eurofighter might actually have a chance to go L1 if they forcefully do price manipulation which Eurofighter group has a reputation of. The purchase of the f4's in 40 numbers is great but if we want manufacturing now we need the f5 so that we can build up on that with the French. If the safran deal comes to fruition we might even re-engine the tejas mk2 and Rafales with the same engine.Rafale was L1.
Rafale is inducted and IN will have it.
Rafale is performing better than intended in India.
And you want India to purchase the L2, increase the logistic nightmare and facing a future Germany deal halt? You are not serious.
Which version will be we procuring. It will be an another foolish move like mki deal if all 114 is of same standard. Any thing less from F5 standard is not worthy move when China & pak going for sixth gen fighters. The deal should be a split between f5 & f6 version.2 Rafales a month will definitely give us all 114 by 2035. We are expected to get all 118 LCA Mk2s by the same time too.
F-35 can be a possibility and is independent of rafale. If the mmrca goes to rafale there's an entire possibility we do a G2G with the Americans for 18-80 f-35A's. The f-35's should be block 4+ though.No Gripen because it hurts Tejas.
No F35 because it hurts AMCA.
Juste remains Rafale.
F-35 can be a possibility and is independent of rafale. If the mmrca goes to rafale there's an entire possibility we do a G2G with the Americans for 18-80 f-35A's. The f-35's should be block 4+ though.
F-35 and rafale fits differently in IAF.
The f-35 would be the tip of the spear while the rafale, lca mk2 will be the spear. While the shield will be the su-30 mki, lca mk1 and su-57. That's how IAF will have to take shape if it wants to take on the Chinese. We need our own stable of fourth,fifth and sixth gen fighters but right now for the next decade we won't be having any fifth gen aircraft unless we procure either the f-35 or su-57 or both considering we would need a long endurance fifth gen fighter that could stay in an air 2 air conflict against the j-20 and j-36 (I'm talking about the su-57 here).
Idk but to me it looks like the same mistake we did with Mirage-2000.
At last a common sense news.
That was 20 years ago. Times have changed, our industry is very different. There is no need to give out $20-25 billion to get a production line. Just order more LCA mk2.Idk but to me it looks like the same mistake we did with Mirage-2000.
Good development but I don't understand the rationale behind waiting so long for the follow-on order. Should've been progressed back in 2022 given RaGa's noise didn't impact the public mandate. Either MoD was sleeping or IAF top brass didn't push hard enough.
At last a common sense news.
At last a common sense news.
Which version will be we procuring. It will be an another foolish move like mki deal if all 114 is of same standard. Any thing less from F5 standard is not worthy move when China & pak going for sixth gen fighters. The deal should be a split between f5 & f6 version.
@randomradio, @vstol Jockey, @Parthu, @Picdelamirand-oil, @Bon Plan, @Speedster1, @Bhartiya Naagrik Sainik, @Ashwin, @marich01, @_Anonymous_, @Innominate, @YoungWolf,
@Aniruddha ,@Milspec, @Sathya, @harry ,@Ironhide, @Arctic Wolf et al.......
As myself have been predicting/harping for the last several years, finally one more prediction is about to come true:
![]()
Rafale Surge: IAF Eyes 40 More Jets as Navy Deal Nears Signing
In a decisive move to shore up India’s dwindling air combat strength, the Indian Air Force (IAF) is reportedly preparing to procure 40 additional Rafale fighter jets from France through a governmentbharatshakti.in
View attachment 42381
View attachment 42382
The EF2000 GaN radar is on the early stage of tests.... So far from being ready. And all the EF developpments are late because difficult to work together when you are 4.My point was for the present mrfa. In the previous mrfa the rafale and the superhornet blk 3 were the most mature aircrafts out of them all. The f-16 was too dated a design and no supercruise, the gripen was too US dependent and small, the typhoon did not have a working aesa. Rafale was the best option with supercruise and all aspect 4++ capability. This time it's different. The Eurofighter has a GaN radar, f-15EX would be offered with GaN radars most likely and this time Eurofighter might actually have a chance to go L1 if they forcefully do price manipulation which Eurofighter group has a reputation of. The purchase of the f4's in 40 numbers is great but if we want manufacturing now we need the f5 so that we can build up on that with the French. If the safran deal comes to fruition we might even re-engine the tejas mk2 and Rafales with the same engine.
But if the French don't bring atleast f5 upgradeability to the indian tender the Eurofighter will be the best contender along with f-15EX.
US wants us to order 114 F-21s for MRFA(they are willing to provide high TOT), and that shall open the route towards IAF acquiring F-35As with ISE (in 40-60 number).Follow-on Rafales off the shelf were always on the table - it would have been quite foolish of us to have spent so much money on ISEs & developing airbase infrastructure for 4 squadrons if we were only ever going to buy 2.
So the +2 squadrons always had to come in order to fully justify the expense of the 2016 deal. Unfortunately, we took too long to arrive at what was a no-brainer decision. Probably cuz we hung on to the false hope of getting the MMRCA 2.0/MRFA deal in time, but that never came.
Also, I don't think the G2G for +2 sqdns of Rafale and G2G for F-35 are in contention with each other. We need F-35 as a stop-gap for a separate requirement (which only AMCA can fulfill in the long term, not any MRFA contender).
But whether F-35 will come or not will be a political decision.
Follow-on Rafales off the shelf were always on the table - it would have been quite foolish of us to have spent so much money on ISEs & developing airbase infrastructure for 4 squadrons if we were only ever going to buy 2.
So the +2 squadrons always had to come in order to fully justify the expense of the 2016 deal. Unfortunately, we took too long to arrive at what was a no-brainer decision. Probably cuz we hung on to the false hope of getting the MMRCA 2.0/MRFA deal in time, but that never came.
Also, I don't think the G2G for +2 sqdns of Rafale and G2G for F-35 are in contention with each other. We need F-35 as a stop-gap for a separate requirement (which only AMCA can fulfill in the long term, not any MRFA contender).
But whether F-35 will come or not will be a political decision.
PAF is anticipating Chinese 6th gen aircraft.US wants us to order 114 F-21s for MRFA(they are willing to provide high TOT), and that shall open the route towards IAF acquiring F-35As with ISE (in 40-60 number).
As I said previously, backdoor talks are on with US, France and Russia for F-35/Rafale/Su-57. GOI & IAF are now in full-sync. Chinese 6th gen jets like J-36/J-50 have literally shook them quite hard along with PAF aquiring J-35 soon. We're in right direction. More to come......
Because rafale and carry as many meteors as the typhoon or gripen. It has more capacity in terms of weapon capacity but still cannot carry as many meteors. It's tactics for BVR and dogfighting are actually extremely similar to how IAF treats air combat(low altitude low speed ambush rather than maintaining higher altitude advantage with high speed to take out opponent which is a more american style way of fighting). The typhoon offers us the high speed high altitude style of options. The su-30mki really doesn't because of lack of good bvr missiles. We don't have the r-37m. Only the typhoon and f-15EX can give us this ability. The typhoon can carry 6 meteors or amraams and will launch it at a higher speed and altitude. IAF has good ground and pounders in their collection. Mirage, su-30mki, tejas, jaguar, rafale. We need more air superiority focused aircrafts that can also do ground and pound. Typhoon does it decently with the meteor,it also has kepd-350 and hope and hosbo, SDB 3's, brimstone , marte-er. Basically a bunch of European stand off munitions. That give us ability to manufacture a range of munitions in India that can be manufactured in India and re-exported back to OEM countries like France Italy, germany in case of situations like war,policy implementations. Redundancy needs to be created. Plus if we plan to join gcap even in a case of backup getting into the typhoon program will give us assistance in joining gcap.The EF2000 GaN radar is on the early stage of tests.... So far from being ready. And all the EF developpments are late because difficult to work together when you are 4.
Rafale will have its own GaN radar in 2030 (it is rumored that Spectra antennas are already built with GaN modules).
And Now that India has Rafale in the forces (Air and Navy) why do you want India to built something quite similar, best in air supremacy (but you have a wide fleet of Su30) but worst in air to ground missions ?