Why are they not placing order bulk order for local production with BDL?
BDL built their facility beforehand knowing orders are guaranteed.
Why are they not placing order bulk order for local production with BDL?
It was shelved because of ASRAAM's local production plans and ready-made status with a bleeding-edge IIR seeker. Astra MK1 IR also would have similar 50kms max engagement range but with 40G limits "off-the rails" whilst ASRAAM has 50G in the same context, so the latter offered better agility in dogfights while matching the proposed range of Astra IR in BVR. Hence IAF selected the MBDA missile over DRDO's.
DRDO's developing NGCCM for the post 2030s. AMCA et al. Astra IR is in the works too.
In our arenal, we have Python V apart from ASRAAM.
True, but the project is shelved for now. It could be revived later though based upon Astra MK2 frame or DRDO could silently be working on a new gen CCM. Let's see.Astra IR would've been a useful capability to have. Not only as a local alternative to the expensive MICA RF/IR but also as a way to counter eccm better by shooting an RF missile followed by IR. (This is reportedly a standard BVR tactic in the RuAF)
Outdated.Granted, we also have the Russian R-27RE1 + TE1 combo but that is older gen tech.
MICA-IR likely(some reports indicate that it is already integrated with MKI), but MICA RF? Nope. Astra MK1 is better than it in every single attribute and Astra MK2 shall maintain that lead over MICA-RF NG too. However, integrating MICA-IR NG with MKI would make most sense looking at low-signature aerial targets in our vicinity.I'd hope that the MICA RF/IR combo would also make its way onto the MKI some day. Apparently, Malaysian MKMs have already been fitted with them.
The P5 was originally acquired to replace the Matra Magic on the Jaguar. However, it was later replaced by the ASRAAM. The only other IAF jet it has been tested from is the Tejas Mk1, afaik.
With the IAF standardizing on ASRAAM,
I'd say P5 has been largely relegated to the S2A role as part of the Spyder-SR system.
ASRAAM was chosen for its range and speed, while P5 and IRIS-T focused more on endgame performance at shorter ranges. So P5 is a pretty good complement to the ASRAAM and MICA IR.
That's also why we want Rafales to be equipped with non-French missiles, 'cause it's gonna play a significant role, like LCA and MKI, due to its numbers. So even Rafales need to carry Astra and ASRAAM, while LCA and MKI will also be eventually equipped with MICA RF and Meteor.
DRDO is better utilised developing a miniaturised version of the Astra Mk1 to go on board the IWB of the AMCA & the various stealthy CCAs / UCAVs we're planning to develop or at least I'm hoping we're planning to develop since most of what we're reading in the public domain seem plans on paper.
With the way air warfare is evolving CCMs will soon be a thing of the past unless we evolve extremely small LO drones / CCAs capable of carrying say 2 x ~ 6 ft long CCMs weighing 50-60 kgs each with a range of 40-50 kms for an ambush attack as it were on LO / VLO FAs.
In my understanding that's the reason both DRDO & IAF decided not to go in for an IIR version of the Astra where such manpower could be better utilised on other tasks.
AMCA should have had at least enough storage for 6 AA missiles, hope AMCA mk2 would be able to do so.AMCA IWB can apparently already accommodate upto 4 Astra Mk1s based on mockup displayed at various airshows. Imo, there is scope for a folding fin variant for internal/semi recessed carriage in future (a la KAI KF-21)
I'd say the small AAM niche (once represented by LM CUDA et all) is increasingly occupied by rockets like APKWS in podded config on 4.5 jets.
Recent events in the ME show that they are quite adequate against slow moving, non maneouvering targets.
5G jets will likely rely on a combo of passive stealth and tech like DIRCM, laser pods to swat/distract incoming missiles.
In the event I wasn't referring to hunting drones or CCAs or even hptrs using such munitions on board FAs. It's a waste of resources. You can do that by upgrading the HTT / IJT / AJT in our arsenal at least as far as hunting drones go maybe not so much hptrs.I'd say the small AAM niche (once represented by LM CUDA et all) is increasingly occupied by rockets like APKWS in podded config on 4.5 jets.
Recent events in the ME show that they are quite adequate against slow moving, non maneouvering targets.
The key word there was ambush. You get a small CCA which also happens to be LO thru design & usage of such MoC for its construction meaning passive stealth close enough without being detected & the NEZ of the CCM should do the rest.5G jets will likely rely on a combo of passive stealth and tech like DIRCM, laser pods to swat/distract incoming missiles.
The key word there was ambush. You get a small CCA which also happens to be LO thru design & usage of such MoC for its construction meaning passive stealth close enough without being detected & the NEZ of the CCM should do the rest.
For more clarity let's say a stealthier version of the CATS Warrior which incidentally the IAF is indifferent to.

It is now almost confirmed that later batches of AMCA will carry 6 BVRAAMs(maybe even from initial batches).AMCA should have had at least enough storage for 6 AA missiles, hope AMCA mk2 would be able to do so.
With 200 kms AAM & VLO becoming the norm I don't see much role for the CCMs beyond say 10-15 years unless stealth becomes undetectable till both planes are within visual range of each other.I don't think CCMs are redundant yet, though. They still serve as the sidearm to the BVRAAMs sniper rifle
Rafale desperately needs a dedicated IIR CCM. MICA IR doesn't cut it as it has a minimum range of ~500m vs ~300m for ASRAAM. In a way, it is good that we settled on the ASRAAM. It will be easier to integrate on the Rafale as it is a MBDA product.
True. There were reports some years ago that the IAF was planning to integrate the Kh-31A/P on the Rafale. However, I doubt the Frenchies would allow any such integration to proceed after the arms embargo. In any case, we have the Rudram now.
Reminds me of Dune on a lighter note where technology is so advanced that personal protective shields have rendered lasers & bullets useless & the only way to kill an opponent is thru a knife / sword duel .
With 200 kms AAM & VLO becoming the norm I don't see much role for the CCMs beyond say 10-15 years unless stealth becomes undetectable till both planes are within visual range of each other.
Really glad to note you didn't write CCMs would serve as anti missile systems. You don't know how happy it makes me feel.CCMs will remain relevant as long as laser/HPM/DIRCM don't reliably replace gatling guns on 4.5G/5G jets. The list of jets without one is huge. RAF Typhoons, US F-35B/C and reportedly even the J-20.