MMRCA 2.0 - Updates and Discussions

What is your favorite for MMRCA 2.0 ?

  • F-35 Blk 4

    Votes: 44 16.4%
  • Rafale F4

    Votes: 205 76.5%
  • Eurofighter Typhoon T3

    Votes: 5 1.9%
  • Gripen E/F

    Votes: 5 1.9%
  • F-16 B70

    Votes: 1 0.4%
  • F-18 SH

    Votes: 10 3.7%
  • F-15EX

    Votes: 11 4.1%
  • Mig-35

    Votes: 2 0.7%

  • Total voters
    268
  • Poll closed .
  1. Software support
    Keeping mission systems, data buses, interfaces and releases stable is another problem.
  2. Sovereign integration of Indian weapons / effectors / networks
    That is a third problem, and it is the one that becomes more demanding with F5.


Yes, I was basically talking about these two. More over, there will be multiple contenders in this I suppose, because Dassault further has sub-contracts with MBDA, THALES etc. So you mean to say the specialist from Dassault will over see it or the individual from these mentioned firms will be in the direct consultation? (Feel free to ignore if any confidentiality is at stake)

es, F5 makes the integration task more complex.
No, that does not automatically make the aircraft too costly to service.
What it does mean is that India must stop thinking only in terms of aircraft maintenance and start thinking in terms of combat-system sovereignty.

What if the whole modular mission computer is changed with the Indian version on Rafale as a prototype, possibly then the Radar needs to be changed as well as there surely be locks on Radar pre installed driver program to sync it with the mission computer?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rajput Lion
This seems like the newer radar, why can't the use the older one?

New connection points.

Not accurate, its passive stealth is one of the primary reason they want the sukhoi 57.

There's not a single official word from IAF claiming they want Su-57, it has been the opposite in fact.

The only time someone official said anything about Su-57 was back in 2025, the defense secretary said they are interested in 40-60 two-seaters in the future. Every time you come across an article saying India is interested in the Su-57, make sure it has an actual source like MoD or IAF and not Russia or HAL.

Now look up all the Su-57 articles you have come across over the last few months and check if there's any official mention.

Just so you know, when official negotiations are going on, the parties involved are not allowed to speak to the media. Look up how much Dassault has said about Rafale during the same period.

It still a bit of an exaggeration tbh but not much but enough to call out the manufacturer's propoganda

The War Thunder guys make their assessments based on open source information. The actual information at the microlevel will be different. The way the engine works in some regimes, especially supercruise, will be different from what's been reported publicly.

The makers are still more reliable than non-related personnel.

Didnt the older models have functioning radars though?

Sure, the APG-81. But that's been superceded by the new GaN radar.

And do you think the Rafael is a better platform than the older F35 which is in operational condition?

Yes. Because the F-35 is still using TR-2 hardware. It doesn't have most of the avionics features operational.

Sure its raw performance might be better and it has the advantage in visual range combat but in the era of beyond visual range combat and first strike capability is critical, how can you say the Rafael will be be able to outperform other 5th gen jets especially against other modern jets with long bvr missiles and advanced SAM?

The Rafale's weapons are better and its avionics suite actually works.

The F-35 with only its TR-2 capabilities is a very simple aircraft with limited capabilities. It cannot defeat advanced IADS for example.

The Americans themselves say they cannot use it to fight the Chinese without its full suite of B4 capabilities, and they are now only going to achieve it in 2031 with minimum hardware access, while full access requires an engine and cooling upgrade.

They screwed up its development. They designed the jet with 14 kW of cooling, but now are claiming they need 80+ kW to get to full B4. Because of the high cooling requirements, it's affecting the performance of the engine too, hence the need for a thrust upgrade.

Yeah and the indianised Su57 will be a beast of a jet who will be unrivalled until the foreseeable future.

As I said, first Izd 30, then evaluations, then we will see. Its potential is after the first 114 Rafales are already operational. But we will be in AMCA era, making it moot.

I don't believe this is true, sure US has no active role but I'm not gonna believe that there is no back channel talks happening for the su57 and we aren't talking about the Russian version but the indianised one where we can swap and upgrade the electronics and hardware as per our desire which is a huge plus.

Nothing's happening outside of Russia and HAL cooking up a deal to then present to the IAF. This is currently being done by all fighter jet OEMs, even Typhoon, F-15EX, F-16, Mig-35, and Gripen E. Meaning, they are all working with Indian partners to present a good deal to the MoD and IAF in parallel to Rafale.

Here's an example, happened just yesterday.

The Russians are just doing it publicly.

IAF is not involved in any of this.

As it stands today, the IAF is yet to evaluate the Su-57, never mind start negotiations for a contract. What's happening with HAL is the Russians just deciding the IAF's configuration on their own. And their lobbying seems to be aimed at a mix of all the gullible people not directly connected to the IAF, like that General Katoch's article posted in the previous page or bureaucrats or politicians while also aiming for the foreign audience, primarily the US politicians and diplomats, to show that they are in a stronger position relative to them, and future prospective operators of the Su-57 who are being led to believe the IAF is seriously considering the offer since HAL is directly involved.

It's just an echochamber.

Soon though.

2040+. For now, it can only get AMCA-class upgrade in a new variant.

They need to develop a VCE first.
 
  • Like
Reactions: YoungWolf
I'd much rather pvt Indian cos like Data Patterns get a chance to prove their worth.

From what I've heard, their radar is harder to integrate while Virupaksha is a dropfit. Virupaksha can be fit into all MKIs without needing MLUs.

Uttam family is a lot larger, so it scales better.

There's the risk factor too. We don't know how mature their tech is.

Why bailout Russian industry at the expense of our own? We owe them no favours.

Anyway, the MLU program is much larger than just a radar or EW upgrade, the latter has consistently been happening for years. It involves a significant restructing and replacement of the aircraft's internal estate. So it's always possible their upgrade is superior to ours and integrates much better with the engine and FCS. For example, an internally equipped MAWS.

We want to retain them as part of the supply chain for future contingencies. The IAF is ensuring there's a non-Indian supply chain available in the rare possibility that the Chinese will attack our supply chain.

Let's see how they go about it.
 
From what I've heard, their radar is harder to integrate while Virupaksha is a dropfit. Virupaksha can be fit into all MKIs without needing MLUs.

Uttam family is a lot larger, so it scales better.

There's the risk factor too. We don't know how mature their tech is.


Data Patterns' Hawk I radar family displayed at AI' 25 had their antenna faces covered which, to me, means they are far ahead of the dev curve than they are letting on.

images.jpeg

But there is still time for the final config to be ready. Virupaksha itself is just entering the prototyping stage. So DP is well placed to compete.

Russian fighter radars typically have much higher MTBO/MTBF than comparable Western tech and their full spec software is export controlled. So the version we get might only be marginally better than the Bars-R variant.
 
Data Patterns' Hawk I radar family displayed at AI' 25 had their antenna faces covered which, to me, means they are far ahead of the dev curve than they are letting on.

View attachment 51160

But there is still time for the final config to be ready. Virupaksha itself is just entering the prototyping stage. So DP is well placed to compete.

Russian fighter radars typically have much higher MTBO/MTBF than comparable Western tech and their full spec software is export controlled. So the version we get might only be marginally better than the Bars-R variant.
if we go to russia for anything apart from structural things then the IAF needs to be bashed. You cant stopgap everything all the time. give your private sector a chance.
 
Data Patterns' Hawk I radar family displayed at AI' 25 had their antenna faces covered which, to me, means they are far ahead of the dev curve than they are letting on.

View attachment 51160

But there is still time for the final config to be ready. Virupaksha itself is just entering the prototyping stage. So DP is well placed to compete.

Russian fighter radars typically have much higher MTBO/MTBF than comparable Western tech and their full spec software is export controlled. So the version we get might only be marginally better than the Bars-R variant.

They have already showed off their antenna design, I guess it was a few months ago. But Uttam is already production-ready versus Hawk still in the early testing phase. Virupaksha just uses the Uttam's backend and processing that is already functional. In terms of readiness, Hawk is way behind.

In any case it's going to be very difficult to compete with DRDO right now 'cause the dropfit advantage is far greater than anything else on offer.

The Hawk 900 is on offer as dropfit for Mig-29 though.

Russians caught up to the West long ago. For example, the TBO of 177S is just 1500 hours, continuing the legacy of the AL-31FP, but Izd 30 has a TBO of 4000 hours, effectively catching up with the West. In terms of system design, 177S now has the same service life as the Flanker airframe, 6000 hours, whereas Izd 30 has 8000 hours, the same as the Su-57, which is also how the West designs their jets. MKI needs 7 AL-31FPs within its design life, whereas new Flankers need only 2. The same changes have been seen in avionics too. Their electronics like GaAs TRMs have been designed to last as much as Western TRMs. Everything new they have developed is now high quality stuff.
 
They have already showed off their antenna design, I guess it was a few months ago. But Uttam is already production-ready versus Hawk still in the early testing phase. Virupaksha just uses the Uttam's backend and processing that is already functional. In terms of readiness, Hawk is way behind.

In any case it's going to be very difficult to compete with DRDO right now 'cause the dropfit advantage is far greater than anything else on offer.

Russians caught up to the West long ago. For example, the TBO of 177S is just 1500 hours, continuing the legacy of the AL-31FP, but Izd 30 has a TBO of 4000 hours, effectively catching up with the West. In terms of system design, 177S now has the same service life as the Flanker airframe, 6000 hours, whereas Izd 30 has 8000 hours, the same as the Su-57, which is also how the West designs their jets. MKI needs 7 AL-31FPs within its design life, whereas new Flankers need only 2. The same changes have been seen in avionics too. Their electronics like GaAs TRMs have been designed to last as much as Western TRMs. Everything new they have developed is now high quality stuff.

SU35 still does not have AESA Radar. Even Military watch magazine which usually pushes Pro-Russian positions, did a article criticising the statement made by Russian military person.


I really want to see which is superior. SU35 vs F15EX
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aniruddha
SU35 still does not have AESA Radar. Even Military watch magazine which usually pushes Pro-Russian positions, did a article criticising the statement made by Russian military person.


I really want to see which is superior. SU35 vs F15EX
F15EX easily. the difference in electronics is too vast and theyre kinematically similar jets. On the other hand if looking theoretically then the newest or upcoming J16s as well as a upgraded su30mki would be better than the F15EX electronically, at least in radar stuff.
 
F15EX easily. the difference in electronics is too vast and theyre kinematically similar jets. On the other hand if looking theoretically then the newest or upcoming J16s as well as a upgraded su30mki would be better than the F15EX electronically, at least in radar stuff.

SU30MKI upgrade will take atleast 12 yrs. Forget about it.

SU35 is going to have an AESA Radar similar to SU57. SU35 with AESA Radar vs F15EX is going to a hair puller.

F15EX has better payload. Huge advantage there.
 
if we go to russia for anything apart from structural things then the IAF needs to be bashed. You cant stopgap everything all the time. give your private sector a chance.

Yeah, but we don't have enough information to have an opinion yet.

Unlike all that Su-57 talk, the Russian MLU requirement came straight from the IAF. This means their MLU package is more advanced.

India's MLU package is actually quite simple, meant for speed rather than capability. Like a Rafale F3 upgrade to F4. It uses the same bus standard as before. But if the Russians put us on a new bus standard, that's gonna make things more interesting.

We are developing a more advanced MLU package for later, after Phase 1's 84 jets. The Russians will probably come in for that.
 
SU35 still does not have AESA Radar. Even Military watch magazine which usually pushes Pro-Russian positions, did a article criticising the statement made by Russian military person.


I really want to see which is superior. SU35 vs F15EX

Today's configuration? F-15EX is superior, hands down.

But if Su-35 is upgraded again, it could change hands.

Both jets meet different roles though. The F-15EX is better optimized for strike, its performance is mediocre. Su-30SM is its direct competitor, although still falls short in terms of performance. The overall Flanker design is superior.
 
Today's configuration? F-15EX is superior, hands down.

But if Su-35 is upgraded again, it could change hands.

Both jets meet different roles though. The F-15EX is better optimized for strike, its performance is mediocre. Su-30SM is its direct competitor, although still falls short in terms of performance. The overall Flanker design is superior.

Does Russia even use its SU30SM2 in the Ukraine war?

Every new jet manufactured in Russia is a SU35. Some SU34 for bombing. Some Mig31.

If Russia cannot even beat USA's 4.5 gen fighter, how the hell are they military superpower?

They don't even AESA Radar for any fighter except SU57.
 
They have already showed off their antenna design, I guess it was a few months ago. But Uttam is already production-ready versus Hawk still in the early testing phase. Virupaksha just uses the Uttam's backend and processing that is already functional. In terms of readiness, Hawk is way behind.

In any case it's going to be very difficult to compete with DRDO right now 'cause the dropfit advantage is far greater than anything else on offer.

The Hawk 900 is on offer as dropfit for Mig-29 though.

Russians caught up to the West long ago. For example, the TBO of 177S is just 1500 hours, continuing the legacy of the AL-31FP, but Izd 30 has a TBO of 4000 hours, effectively catching up with the West. In terms of system design, 177S now has the same service life as the Flanker airframe, 6000 hours, whereas Izd 30 has 8000 hours, the same as the Su-57, which is also how the West designs their jets. MKI needs 7 AL-31FPs within its design life, whereas new Flankers need only 2. The same changes have been seen in avionics too. Their electronics like GaAs TRMs have been designed to last as much as Western TRMs. Everything new they have developed is now high quality stuff.

They'd still need to prove it all works in real world conditions though. Brochure figures are often exaggerated and the Russians are no exception.

Besides, Russia no longer has access to Western CNC machines, and other COTS components since Ukraine. So their production processes have had to be modified across multiple projects. We don't know if the Russian equivalents are on par with equipment from Siemens and other global suppliers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: YoungWolf
They'd still need to prove it all works in real world conditions though. Brochure figures are often exaggerated and the Russians are no exception.

Besides, Russia no longer has access to Western CNC machines, and other COTS components since Ukraine. So their production processes have had to be modified across multiple projects. We don't know if the Russian equivalents are on par with equipment from Siemens and others.

Can India produce aero components without western/japanese CNC machines?

BFW, Jyoti CNC, LMW, Lokesh Machines- are these CNCs atleast good enough to be used in aerospace and defence?
 
Can India produce aero components without western/japanese CNC machines?

BFW, Jyoti CNC, LMW, Lokesh Machines- are these CNCs atleast good enough to be used in aerospace and defence?

A lot of work is happening, esp in Gujarat, where there is a MSME cluster specializing in CNC forging and machining equipment with defence applications.

 
A lot of work is happening, esp in Gujarat, where there is a MSME cluster specializing in CNC forging and machining equipment with defence applications.


Better sign some MOUs/JVs with Japanese and Germans in state of art CNC machines.
 
Does Russia even use its SU30SM2 in the Ukraine war?

Every new jet manufactured in Russia is a SU35. Some SU34 for bombing. Some Mig31.

If Russia cannot even beat USA's 4.5 gen fighter, how the hell are they military superpower?

They don't even AESA Radar for any fighter except SU57.

All Flankers are being used in war. Their main equalizer is the Su-57. And military power is not just about fighter jets, they have other stuff too.

The F-15EX is a new development whereas Su-35 is almost 15 years old. The Americans don't even have a full squadron.

Yeah, they screwed up on AESA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tamilan57
They'd still need to prove it all works in real world conditions though. Brochure figures are often exaggerated and the Russians are no exception.

Besides, Russia no longer has access to Western CNC machines, and other COTS components since Ukraine. So their production processes have had to be modified across multiple projects. We don't know if the Russian equivalents are on par with equipment from Siemens and other global suppliers.

They have found workarounds. They just can't get them directly.
 
SU30MKI upgrade will take atleast 12 yrs. Forget about it.

SU35 is going to have an AESA Radar similar to SU57. SU35 with AESA Radar vs F15EX is going to a hair puller.

F15EX has better payload. Huge advantage there.
lmao if it takes us 12 years to upgrade the su30 mki then we need to stop dreaming about a lot of things et alone the su30 upgrade.