You're unbanned. Nice. Comrade, you're doing the same and that too with a very smug attitude.
China’s “String of Pearls” and India's Two Front War Predicament : Analysis
- Thread starter Aashish
- Start date
Do you think the Indian army will attack with a large number of light infantry as you think?
Since 2020, a large number of Chinese military enthusiasts have been looking for various information about the Indian mountain troops.
We found that Indians are expressing a certain method of warfare in all their military videos.
Use some elite airborne troops to occupy key heights and hold these heights before the Chinese army counterattacks.India then used an armored force consisting of T90 tanks and BMP2 infantry fighting vehicles to quickly support the airborne troops under the cover of AH64E helicopters.
India's widely publicized Siachen Glacier Force has never actually played any role in any video of Indian military exercises.
This is why I said that India is on the offensive and China is on the defensive at the border. India hopes to occupy key heights with rapid airdrops and armored assaults, while the Chinese border troops must hold their positions until support arrives from the rear.
Wow so comparison of Rafale vs J20 is stupid but comparison between LRHASM a hypersonic glide vehicle reaching Mach 10 and some Chinese dildo which can barely reach 600 km with a CEP of 300 m is valid???? Keep coping dear comrade
. I mean how shameless can a person be i wonder. Let me guess you believe your cheap third grade copy of S300 can defeat LRHASM that too very easily 
.Even Prithvi from 1989 is better than your unbelievably horrendous DF15 and as said earlie even Prithvi can defeat your poor copy of S300 let alone LRHASM. HQ trying to shoot down LRHASM will be like a Chinese guy driving: both cannot see what's infront of them and will only hurt themselves.
Last edited by a moderator:
What a load of BS. Its China that bullies Phillipines Vietnam Indonesia and also India in the mountains but we are to believe that China is under attack from everyone else. You were the first ones to launch an attack in 1962 and the first ones to make a move in Galwan, you gave nuclear weapons to a terrorist state and implicitly condone their terrorist attacks against innocent civilians in India but somehow China is always the victim!!!
You people need to be dealt with the way Japan did in 1937. Japan crushed your arrogance by showing how a small island with 10 times less people can defeat your arrogant little country, a trauma which still haunts you guys today.
She's not even trying to win, she's just spewing some bullshit but demands rationality from us. Compares a HGV to some Chinese dildo from the 1980s with 300m CEP but also makes fun of us for comparing Rafale vs J20. Its not a smug attitude it's a shameless subhuman attitude.
Up until date India hasn't initiated any of the wars it has fought. Nobody & I mean nobody in the world leave aside anyone in India foresees India waging a war against China except the CCP & their Han slaves.
Check out Operation Snow Leopard , the reasons it was undertaken & more importantly where it was undertaken.
There are no "Siachen Glacier Forces." It's manned on a voluntary basis by different regiments of the Indian Army most if not all of whom look forward to this assignment as it's a true test of challenging their abilities in an extremely hostile environment .
This assignment in turn stands them in good stead manning positions across the LAC. I've lost count of the number of times people here have had to literally school you.
Anybody else would've been embarassed about it & done his homework before commenting here. Not a Wumao though. That thick skin is what has helped them endure a century + 80 years of humiliation I guess.
So why did China withdraw from most positions before confirming a peace deal same time in 2024 in a meeting between Modi & Great Helmsman 2 ?
Are you suggesting China offered its own territory to India ? That's humiliation. You'd pay dearly for your comments if your supervisor in the MSS reads this codswallop.
You'd lose all your social credit points , be banned from accessing the internet , would most likely be sent to re education camps or even disappeared.
no
He/She still hasnt done anything worthy of being banned other than stating his/her opinion. We can disagree with that opinion but it doesnt deserve any sort of ban imo
id rather someone from the other side of the curtain be unbanned, it gives a unique perspective to whats going on in the other side. We cant simply have only our own rhetoric here without perceiving how our opponents view their capabilities vs us.
He/She still hasnt done anything worthy of being banned other than stating his/her opinion. We can disagree with that opinion but it doesnt deserve any sort of ban imo
This isn't exactly an echo chamber circle jerk type of place. We know very well the areas where our standing is very precarious and other areas where we are somewhat better. That thing was banned before for derailing other conversations with it's absolutely horrible takes.
You know last time she compared Agni 5 with DF26 and said all Agni 5s can be intercepted using HQ19? Its a very funny and incredulous take, almost clown tier rage bait which is not fit for this forum. Its literally CCP propaganda.
We have a whole ecosystem to tell us that
. Our very own very special Hydra is prime example of how they go beyond even CCP to point out the gaps, exaggerate it, blame it on one person while neglecting the reality.The last time he had requested that he be perma banned and his profile deleted. I thought he was gone for good. He is back here derailing threads. He'll trip up and get banned again. He can't help but stir up trouble as simple as that (a troll). Him and the other comrade safriz would both feel welcome at P-D-F. Yet, both stay here due to a simple reason - trolling and trying to pull a smart one on the Indian crowd - superior hai hum janaab.
huh didnt know about that, but still id rather he/she still stay unbanned as long as saying they dont randomnly ragebait or derail conversations
I have not watched the full video. Got the video via an NBT article.
Before going into it, I wanted to know if anyone is familiar with retd. col JS Sodhi.
Is he a good analyst? Credible ? Should I take his pov more seriously as opposed to the usual attitude while watching people talk about it.
Your help can help me in how to approach his pov. Thanks
Another video. Here the title states 2035 while earlier was 2030.
@_Anonymous_ This is right up your alley
Never heard of him. Besides the video is 1.5 hrs long. Just realised it after seeing the first few minutes. He's claiming the invasion would happen in 2035 based on the little I've seen .
Xi Jinping is already 72 . He's not getting any younger . Besides as I've pointed out earlier the internal tussles in the CCP first seen ~ 2020 hasn't lessened since.
In fact it's intensified. What that means is the situation within the CCP continues to be volatile. IMO that constitutes the single biggest threat prompting the leadership there to indulge in adventurism when they're not exactly prepared for it.
I'd stick to the dates I've put forward multiple times before ie - 2030 give or take a year. Could be earlier too . Same time in a decade this'd be over & done with , one way or another.
First of all, the strength and capability simply do not exist.
Secondly, Russia is of paramount importance to China.
Finally, according to dialectical thinking—even powerful dynasties like the Great Tang and the Great Qing failed to project their influence beyond the Taklamakan Desert. For today’s China to talk about Siberia is pure wishful thinking.
Furthermore, Myanmar is of far greater strategic importance to China than Siberia ever will be
Yup i too believe, if china eger wanted to invade and annex any sovereign territory it never claimed to be her then it must of myanmar
A nation with less than 60 million population, and some ethnicity shares w8th the tribes/ethnicity of china's south
And an internallly divided country, with no major power ready to have a war to save it
Myanmar as a country does not seems to exist far too in future
Too little cost and too much benefit, finally open to no chokepoint and no usa dominance, and compleete access to ocean, and obv untapped natural resources
If i were ccp president, then it will be tempting to select whats better ? Taiwan or Myanmar ?
A very developed country with own people but a superpower(usa) may came uo defend it along with japan
OR a huge natural resource country that gives unrestricted, unchallenged open ocean access and can not be blocked by any other country gives huge advantage in invading taiwan when usa may blocked china
But then risk being considered imperialist and basically the usa of asia
It can't be helped. I believe that without this kind of 'quantum leap,' China's future would be bleak. It would be one thing if we could truly maintain good relations with Japan and Southeast Asian countries, but the historical influence and control the U.S. exerts over them is simply too immense to shake
That's never a good thing. Countries collapse when this happens.
The right method is to bring in reforms that allow the rich to redistribute wealth on their own with profits in mind, and the only way to do that is by increasing consumption.
Population won't collapse, it will reach a bottom and then climb up again. We just don't know what that bottom is.
If you were given a money printing press, tell me, would you use it with restraint? I think that as long as you still have a shred of human nature in you, you absolutely would not.
Therefore, that first path is completely unfeasible. As for the population, when will it hit rock bottom? There is absolutely no historical precedent for a recovery among advanced nations. Consequently, whether it is China or India, there will be no rebound. Survival is a fundamental human instinct, but destruction is a fundamental human instinct as well
Once people become educated and civilized, they feel a profound sense of responsibility toward their offspring. If you maintain the current system of ownership—where wealth is passed from father to son, and from son to grandson—then the naturally logical strategy to ensure the next generation lives a better life is to have fewer children. This should be a universal consensus among all parents.
Having more children is for oneself; having fewer children is for the sake of the children.
Therefore, population collapse has nothing to do with economic levels; it has to do with human nature. This process is irreversible.
Unless, as I just mentioned, this entire system of ownership is completely razed to the ground and the state steps in to raise your children, it is absolutely impossible for the population to rebound