Status
Not open for further replies.
It's apparently the opposite.

Meteor's tail will be colder than the sustainer of a solid rocket. Plus it's slower than a solid rocket during cruise by at least mach 0.5. It only speeds up higher than the solid rocket during the endgame. So it's overall a more stealthy missile when it counts and an overall superior missile during the endgame.
Meteor max speed is said to be up to mach 4.5.
 
Read again "is not initially as fast". This explains and proves my statement. It has a slower initial launch velocity compared to AMRAAM D but during cruise, it is faster than AMRAAM D.
Indeed. And that mean that unlike AMRAAM, Meteor can't be used as a 'second choice' short range missile.
 
What nuclear war? First India needs to have balls to stop the water flow into Pakistan. More than half of the napaki population will come down on knees. It shuld have been done after 26/11 and till now the donkeys in administration finding out possibilities of doing this. If we can't do this we can't press the button , but if NSA Ajit Doval has the authority or people like Yogi are in the hold of power, then they will definitely press it. Others are weak hearted khassis and big mouths, even Napakis don't have balls.

No. No screwing around with water.
 
I am honestly amazed. Pakistan is like the little kid who buys a brick game and thinks he has the capabilities of a game boy.

Pakistan Navy test fires an indigenously developed multi role Cruise Missile system. This missile is based on the Babur Cruise Missile family. It was fired from an indigenously built Fast Attack Craft. The missile is capable of destroying targets, both at sea and land.
The video seems to be for indicative purpose, but chatter on peedeaf suggests a sea to surface missile. Not sure if they actually have any *indigenously built* Fast Attack Crafts though
 
Last edited:
Pakistan Navy test fires an indigenously developed multi role Cruise Missile system. This missile is based on the Babur Cruise Missile family. It was fired from an indigenously built Fast Attack Craft. The missile is capable of destroying targets, both at sea and land.
The video seems to be for indicative purpose, but chatter on peedeaf suggests a sea to surface missile. Not sure if they actually have any *indigenously built* Fast Attack Crafts though

Its their long standing wet dream - to avenge Operation Trident and Operation Python from 71. Only India has come a long way in real time surveillance now and chances of this attack working are pretty slim.
 
Imagine if Pakistan was at our position, they would have not just stopped water they would have poisoned it. They would have destroyed us by now.

doesn't matter. Water, Air, Food- war, even nuclear war is justified. Indus Water Treaty has provided a sable solution for decades. It should continue. f**k them in every other way. But keep hands off this.
 
doesn't matter. Water, Air, Food- war, even nuclear war is justified. Indus Water Treaty has provided a sable solution for decades. It should continue. f**k them in every other way. But keep hands off this.
Why hit the nooclear button if the all-spectrum hybrid offensive defence approach is serving us well. Bakistan is perfectly capable of self-destruction without any external assistance. We just catalyse the process.
 
Another important aspect is to create a counterforce arsenal of nuke weapons over the next decade and half.The huge facility in chellakere bodes well in this regard.

What we need is an arsenal of 300-400
nuclear warheads and then stop.4 ssbns each with 12x4 or 16x3 MIRV slbms with range to hit chinese mainland is main priority.With 4 you will always have one on patrol with 48 warheads..enough to finish han heartland or destroy pakistan entirely.
Thus 192 warheads are needed.

2ndary force should be combination of 100-150 road mobile Agni 6 icbm and Agni3/4 irbm .Finally a couple dozen nuclear glide bombs and air launched cruise missiles for manual delivery by aircraft.

Then we need to remove no first use doctrine to make the Pakistanis crap their pants.
We dont need megaton weapons as with improved accuracy 200-300kt weapons can do the job easily.With removal of no first use it will give us the option of a massive pre emptive strike on their nuke facilities if we detect a pak nuke strike coming.With so many warheads we will have potential to destroy bulk of their nuke forces outright.This forces them to increase their warheads to increase chances of survival of enough assets to survive a pre emptive strike which will be financially crippling.

Now of the 120 warheads they have it must be noted that a significant portion are small pataka tac nukes with sub kiloton yields unlike ours where all are strategic countervalue weapons.
Biggest yield weapons they have are 20-40kt fission devices which they would need multiple numbers of to take down a modern city.Here if we start deploying missile shield even with 50% interception probability it will double the number of warheads they would need to maintain a credible deterrent.
The ballistic missile shield thus is a big headache for pakistan.

A combination of these measures i feel would draw the atomi gernails into an nuclear arms race with a bankrupt economy and collapse them .What is now needed is -1.The technology to mature so that such long range missiles can be deployed in mass
2.The vision and willpower by political leadership to withdraw no first use.
3.Deployment of BMD shield on all vital cities and facilities around India.
4.Building our own economy so that such an expansion is natural and doesnt end up burdening ourselves economically.
 
Another important aspect is to create a counterforce arsenal of nuke weapons over the next decade and half.The huge facility in chellakere bodes well in this regard.

What we need is an arsenal of 300-400
nuclear warheads and then stop.4 ssbns each with 12x4 or 16x3 MIRV slbms with range to hit chinese mainland is main priority.With 4 you will always have one on patrol with 48 warheads..enough to finish han heartland or destroy pakistan entirely.
Thus 192 warheads are needed.

2ndary force should be combination of 100-150 road mobile Agni 6 icbm and Agni3/4 irbm .Finally a couple dozen nuclear glide bombs and air launched cruise missiles for manual delivery by aircraft.

Then we need to remove no first use doctrine to make the Pakistanis crap their pants.
We dont need megaton weapons as with improved accuracy 200-300kt weapons can do the job easily.With removal of no first use it will give us the option of a massive pre emptive strike on their nuke facilities if we detect a pak nuke strike coming.With so many warheads we will have potential to destroy bulk of their nuke forces outright.This forces them to increase their warheads to increase chances of survival of enough assets to survive a pre emptive strike which will be financially crippling.

Now of the 120 warheads they have it must be noted that a significant portion are small pataka tac nukes with sub kiloton yields unlike ours where all are strategic countervalue weapons.
Biggest yield weapons they have are 20-40kt fission devices which they would need multiple numbers of to take down a modern city.Here if we start deploying missile shield even with 50% interception probability it will double the number of warheads they would need to maintain a credible deterrent.
The ballistic missile shield thus is a big headache for pakistan.

A combination of these measures i feel would draw the atomi gernails into an nuclear arms race with a bankrupt economy and collapse them .What is now needed is -1.The technology to mature so that such long range missiles can be deployed in mass
2.The vision and willpower by political leadership to withdraw no first use.
3.Deployment of BMD shield on all vital cities and facilities around India.
4.Building our own economy so that such an expansion is natural and doesnt end up burdening ourselves economically.

As of now ~ 210 available
 
  • Informative
Reactions: phndrt
I think we are waiting for UN vote on Masood Azhar

Foreign Secy Vijay Gokhale went to China

Early May will be decisive for Masood Azhar

Military action can happen even later
 
Status
Not open for further replies.